Robust multi-objective wing design optimization via CFD approximation model

Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 286-300

  Liang, Yu ^a   Cheng, Xiao Quan ^a   Li, Zheng Neng ^a   Xiang, Jin Wu ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Kriging model; Multi objective; Non dominated; NURBS; Robustness

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955816433     PISSN: 19942060     EISSN: 1997003X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2011.11015371     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bazilevs Y, Hughes T J R (2008). NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mesh 43:143-150.
2. Coello C C A, Lamont GB, Veldhuizen D A V (2007). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. 2nd Edition. Springer.
3. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2):182-197. (Pubitemid 34555372)
4. Ehrgott M (2005). Multicriteria Optimization. 2nd Edition. Springer.
5. Hicks RM, Henne PA (1978). Wing design by numerical optimization. Journal of Aircraft 15(7):407-412.
6. Hughes T J R, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005). Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194 (39-41): 4135-4195. (Pubitemid 40875970)
7. Koch PN, Simpson TW, Allen JK, Mistree F (1999). Statistical approximations for multidisciplinary design optimization: the problem of size. Journal of Aircraft 36(1):275-286.
8. Koch PN, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004). Design for six sigma through robust optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:235-248.
9. Kumaono T, Jeong S, Obayashi S, Ito Y, Hatanaka K, Morino H (2006). Multidisciplinary design optimization of wing shape for a small jet aircraft using Kriging model. 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 9-12 January, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2006-932.
10. Li W, Huyse L, Padula S (2001). Robust Airfoil Optimization to Achieve Consistent Drag Reduction over a Mach Range. Report, NASA/CR-2001-211042.
11. Lépine J, Guibault F, Trépanier JY (2001). Optimized nonuniform rational B-spline geometrical representation for aerodynamic design of wings. AIAA Journal 39(11):2033-2041.
12. Lépine J, Trépanier JY (2000). Wing aerodynamic design using an optimized NURBS geometrical representation. 38th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, 10-13 January, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2000-0699.
13. Long T, Liu L, Wang JB, Meng LT (2008). Multi-objective multidisciplinary optimization of long-endurance UAV wing using surrogate models in ModelCenter. 12th AIAA/ISSOM Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 10-12 September, Victoria, British Columbia Canada, AIAA 2008-5918.
14. Painchaud-Ouellet S, Tribes C, Trépanier JY, Pelletier D (2004). Airfoil shape optimization using NURBS representation under thickness constraint. 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 5-8 January, Reno, Nevada, AIAA 2004-1095.
15. Park GJ, Lee TH, Lee KH, Hwang KH (2006). Robust design: an overview. AIAA Journal 44(1):181-191. (Pubitemid 43143925)
16. Piegl L, Tiller W (1995). The NURBS Book. 2nd Edition, Springer.
17. Ramakrishna PV, Govardhan M (2009). Aerodynmiac performance of low speed axial flow compressor rotors with sweep and tip clearance. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 3(2):195-206.
18. Roberts RA, Cui J (2010). Selection of the simulation domain for turbulent flow around an airfoil. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 4(3):441-449.
19. Ryu JS, Kim MS, Cha KJ, Lee TH, Choi DH (2002). Kriging interpolation methods in geostatistics and DACE model. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 16(5):619-632. (Pubitemid 36699242)
20. Schittkowski K (1985). NLPQL: A Fortran subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Annals of Operations Research 5(6):485-500.
21. Schmitt V, Charpin F (1979). Pressure Distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers. Report, AGARD-AR-138.
22. Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujii K (2008). Development of multi-objective six-sigma approach for robust design optimization. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication 5(8):215-233.
23. Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujii K (2007). Multi-objective six sigma approach applied to robust airfoil design for mars airplane. 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 23-26 April, Honolulu, Hawaii, AIAA 2007-1966.
24. Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (1998). Comparison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA-98-4755.
25. Sobieczky H (1998). Parametric airfoils and wings. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics 68:71-88.
26. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR (1992). A oneequation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 6-9 January, Reno, Nevada, AIAA-92-0439 1992.
27. Srinath DN, Mittal S (2010). Optimal aerodynamic design of airfoils in unsteady viscous flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 199 (29-32): 1976-1991.
28. Wang XL, Zhu ZQ, Wu ZC, Chen ZM (2008). Bi-objective optimization design of civil transport wing using N-S equations. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 34(7):739-742. [in Chinese]
29. Yang ZG, Yang W, Jia Q (2010). Ground viscous effect on 2D flow of wing in ground proximity. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 4(4):521-531.
30. Zhong XP, Ding JF, Li WJ, Zhang Y (2008). Robust airfoil optimization with multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 21(4):289-295.