Urban industrial contaminated sites: a new issue in the field of environmental remediation in China

Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 784-794

  Liao, Xiao Yong ^a   Chong, Zhong Yi ^a,b   Yan, Xiu Lan ^a   Zhao, Dan ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Contaminated sites; Heavy metal; Organic pollution; Remediation technologies; Urban industry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHINA; CITY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; POLLUTION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHINA; CITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79955708740     PISSN: 02503301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. 2009, 21 (2/3): 558-565.
2. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Treatment technologies for site cleanup: annual status report (12th edition) [R]. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.
3. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear. Federal soil protection act and ordinance [EB/OL]. http: //www. bmu. de/english/soil_conservation_contamined_sites/downloads/doc/3286. php, 1999.
4. European Commission. The soil thematic strategy [EB/OL]. http: //ec. europa. eu/environment/soil/three_en. htm, 2006.
5. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Brownfields technology primer: requesting and evaluating proposals that encourage innovative technologies for investigation and cleanup [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2001.
6. 2010.
7. 2009.
8. 2010.
9. 2009.
10. 2008, 28 (11): 5454-5460.
11. Yeom I T, Ghosh M M, Cox C D. Kinetic aspects of surfactant solubilization of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30 (5): 1589-1595.
12. Cousins I T, Gevao B, Jones K C. Measuring and modelling the vertical distribution of semi-volatile organic compounds in soils. I: PCB and PAH soil core data [J]. Chemosphere, 1999, 39 (14): 2507-2518.
13. 2005, 18 (4): 79-83.
14. 2007, 37 (2): 303- 310.
15. EEA. Progress in management of contaminated sites [EB/OL]. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data -and-maps/indicators/progress-in-management- of-contaminated-sites/progress-in-management-of -contaminated-1, 2007.
16. http: //www. hjxf. net/case/2008/0807/article_2. html, 2008.
17. http: //zt. xinhua023. com/sthb/Content/2009-04/03/content_189621. htm, 2009.
18. http: //www. hjxf. net/case/2010/0315/article_32. html, 2010.
19. http: //www. czeri. com/news_show. aspx?newsid=549& newstypeid=1, 2010.
20. http: //www. hjxf. net/case/2009/1201/article_29. html, 2009.
21. 2005, 14 (4): 512-515.
22. 2005, 14 (1): 6-9.
23. 2009, 30 (4): 1166-1172.
24. Chung M K, Hu R, Cheung K C, et al. Pollutants in Hong Kong soils: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 67 (3): 464-473.
25. 2004, 13 (3): 323-326.
26. 2008, 47 (1): 93-97.
27. 2009, 28 (4): 702-706.
28. Maskaoui K, Hu Z, Zhou J, et al. Levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in some agricultural, industrial and urban areas along Xiamen coastal waters, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Science, 2006, 18 (2): 318-322.
29. 2008, 21 (2): 30-33.
30. 2007, 46 (3): 376-381.
31. 2008, 47 (3): 451-456.
32. 2008, 21 (1): 26-28.
33. 2008, 27 (3): 850-854.
34. 2008, 31 (7): 135-140.
35. 2006, 13 (1): 230- 235.
36. 2007, 26 (5): 1630-1634.
37. 2009, 29 (12): 2597-2605.
38. 2009, 28 (8): 1562-1566.
39. 2009, 31 (3): 32-35.
40. 2001, 17 (6): 84-90.
41. 2001, 17 (4): 87-96.
42. 2008, 2 (7): 994-999.
43. 2010, 4 (4): 915-918.
44. DCLG. Previously-developed land that may be available for development: England 2007 [R]. London: Department for Communities and Local Government, 2008.
45. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Cleaning up the nation s waste sites: markets and technology trends (2004 edition) [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
46. US EPA. Building on success: protecting human health and the environment (FY 2007 Superfund annual report) [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2008.
47. 2008, 21 (2): 197-202.
48. Thornton J S, Wootan W L. Venting for the removal of hydrocarbon vapors from gasoline contaminated soil [J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 1982, 17 (1): 31-44.
49. Khan F I, Husain T, Hejazi R. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 71 (2): 95-122.
50. Wang L K, Hung Y, Shammas N K. Handbook of advanced industrial and hazardous wastes treatment [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009. 519-570.
51. Goi A, Kulik N, Trapido M. Combined chemical and biological treatment of oil contaminated soil [J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 63 (10): 1754-1763.
52. 2007, 27 (z1): 190-193.
53. Liang C, Huang C F, Chen Y J. Potential for activated persulfate degradation of BTEX contamination [J]. Water Research, 2008, 42 (15): 4091-4100.
54. Ferrarese E, Andreottola G, Oprea I A. Remediation of PAH-contaminated sediments by chemical oxidation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152 (1): 128-139.
55. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. How to evaluate alternative cleanup technologies for underground storage tank sites [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.
56. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. A citizen s guide to in situ thermal desorption [R]. Washington, DC.: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1996.
57. 2007, 1 (6): 91-96.
58. 2007, 39 (4): 497-502.
59. 2010, (1): 31-33.
60. 2006, 27 (7): 1439-1443.
61. 2008, 29 (7): 1973-1976.
62. Weyens N, Van Der Lelie D, Artois T, et al. Bioaugmentation with engineered endophytic bacteria improves contaminant fate in phytoremediation [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (24): 9413-9418.
63. Fortin J, Jury W A, Anderson M A. Enhanced removal of trapped non-aqueous phase liquids from saturated soil using surfactant solutions [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1997, 24 (3-4): 247-267.
64. 1997, 16 (1): 1-14.
65. 1999, 18 (9): 420- 424.
66. 1999.
67. Sabatini D A, Knox R C, Harwell J H. Surfactant-enhanced DANPLs remediation: surfactant selection, hydraulic efficiency, and economic factors [R]. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996.
68. 2008, 27 (5): 835-840.
69. 2004, 23 (4): 806-809.
70. 2010, 29 (2): 407-408.
71. 2009, 30 (7): 2153-2159.
72. Sun Y, Ji L, Wang W, et al. Simultaneous removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and copper from soils using ethyl lactate-amended EDDS solution [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2009, 38: 1591-1597.
73. Chen J, Wang X, Hu J, et al. Numerical simulation of PAHs sorption/desorption on soil with the influence of Tween80 [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 18 (4): 716-720.
74. Henry S M, Bennett C R. Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced DNAPL remediation case studies [R]. San Diego: American Chemical Society, 2001.
75. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Cost and performance report: soil vapor extraction at the Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Superfund Site, San Jose, California [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.
76. Tetra Tech EM Inc.Analysis of selected Enhancements for soil vapor extraction [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
77. Parsons Engineering Science Inc. Bioventing performance and cost results from multiple air force test sites [R]. Brooks: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, 1996.
78. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Field applications of in situ remediation technologies: chemical oxidation [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
79. Mulligan C N, Yong R N, Gibbs B F. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review [J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 60 (9): 371-380.
80. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. In situ thermal treatment of chlorinated solvents: fundamentals and field applications (EPA 2004) [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
81. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. In situ remediation technology: electrokinetics [R]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1995.