Cardiovascular responses to orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: Comparing fiberoptic bronchoscopy with direct laryngoscopy

Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 833-838

  Aghdaii, Nahid ^a   Azarfarin, Rasoul ^b   Yazdanian, Forouzan ^b   Faritus, Seyede Zahra ^b  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Bronchoscope; Fiberoptic; Hemodynamic; Laryngoscopy; Orotracheal intubation; Responses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRONCHOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRONCHOSCOPY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 79955685969     PISSN: 05440440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. McCoy EP, Mirakhur RK, McCloskey BV A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade. Anaesthesia; 1995, 50:943-946.
2. ®) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg; 2002, 95:480-4.
3. Choyce A, Avidan MS, Harvey A, et al The cardiovascular response to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia; 2002, 57:330-333.
4. YoshihiRo H, Shuji D Differences in cardiovascular response to airway stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lidocaine. Anesthesiology; 2000, 93:95-103.
5. Latorre F, Hofmann M, Kleemann PP, Dick WF Stress response to nasotracheal intubation: a comparative evaluation of fiberendoscopic vs. laryngoscopic intubation with and without topical anaesthesia of the larynx. Anaesthetist; 1993, 42:423-6.
6. Rose DK, Cohen MM: The airway: Problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth; 1994, 41:372-383.
7. Takita K, Morimoto Y, Kemmotsu O: Tracheal lidocaine attenuates the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth; 2001, 48:732-736.
8. Schaefer HG, Marsch SC, Strebel SP, Drewe J Cardiovascular effects of fibreoptic oral intubation. A comparison of a total intravenous and a balanced volatile technique. Anaesthesia; 1992, 47:1034-1036.
9. Mustola ST, Baer GA, Metsa-Ketela T, Laippala P Haemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses during total intravenous anaesthesia for laryngomicroscopy. Thiopentone compared with propofol. Anaesthesia; 1995, 50:108-113.
10. Maguire AM, Kumar N, Parker JL, Rowbotham DJ, Thompson JP Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. Br J Anaesth; 2001, 86:90-3.
11. Neidhart PP, Champion P, Vogel J, Zsigmond EK, Tassonyi E A comparison of pipecuronium with pancuronium on haemodynamic variables and plasma catecholamines in coronary artery bypass patients. Can J Anaesth; 1994, 41:469-474.
12. Kirvela M, Scheinin M, Lindgren L Haemodynamic and catecholamine responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in diabetic and non-diabetic uraemic patients. Br J Anaesth; 1995, 74:60-65.
13. Nishikawa K, Omote K, Kawana S, Namiki A: A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by using the lightwand device and the laryngoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg; 2000, 90:1203-7.
14. Tsubaki T, Aono K, Nakajima T, Shigematsu A: A Blood pressure, heart rate and catecholamine response during fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. J Anesth; 1992, Oct. 6(4):474-9.
15. Hawkyard SJ, Morrison A, Doyle LA, Croton RS, Wake PN Attenuating the hypertensive response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation using awake fiberoptic intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1992, 36:1-4.
16. Kitamura T, Yamada Y, Chinzei M, Du HL, Hamaoka KAttenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the StyletScope. Br J Anaesth; 2001, 86:275-7.
17. Nishikawa K, Kawana S, Namiki A: Comparison of the lightwand technique with direct laryngoscopy for awake endotracheal intubation in emergency cases. J Clin Anesth; 2001, 13:259-63.
18. Kimura A, Yamakage M, Chen X, Kamada Y, Namiki A: Use of the fibreoptic stylet scope (Styletscope) reduces the hemodynamic response to intubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth; 2001, 48:919-23.
19. Xue FS, Li CW, Liu KP, Sun HT, Zhang GH, Xu YC, Liu Y: Circulatory Responses to Fiberoptic Intubation in Anesthetized Children: A Comparison of Oral and Nasal Routes. Anesth Analg; 2007, 104:283-288.
20. Kovak AL: Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth; 1996, 8:63-79.
21. Adachi YU, Satomoto M, Higuchi H, Watanabe K: Fentanyl attenuates the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation more than the response to laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg; 2002, Jul. 95(1):233-7, table of contents.
22. Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg; 1992, 74:411-4.
23. Bucx MJ, Snijders CJ, Van Geel RT, et al: Forces acting on the maxillary incisor teeth during laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia; 1994, 49:1064-70.
24. Tong JL, Ashworth DR, Smith JE: Cardiovascular responses following laryngoscope assisted, fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia; 2005, 60:754-8.
25. Adachi YU, Takamatsu I, Watanabe K, Uchihashi Y, Higuchi H, Satoh T: Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring: comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth; 2000, 12:503-8.
26. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, Lischinsky S, Rosenberg B: Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation:direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. Journal of Clinical anesthesia; 2003, 15:132-6.
27. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Li CW, Liu KP: Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth; 2007, Jun, 19(4):245-50.
28. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Sun HT, Li CW, Li P, Liu KP, Xu YC, Liu Y, Liu J: A comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope and laryngoscope in children. Paediatr Anaesth; 2006, Jul. 6(7):743-7.
29. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Sun HY, et al: Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with glidescope (R) videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006, 23:522-526.
30. HiRabaYashi Y, HiRuta M, KawakaMi T, INoue S, Fukuda H, Saitoh K, ShiMizu R: Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth; 1998, 81:253-5.
31. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ: Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth; 1987, 59:295-9.