Measuring CMOT's intellectual structure and its development

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-34

  Meyer, Matthias ^a   Zaggl, Michael A ^a   Carley, Kathleen M ^b  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Co citation analysis; Computational organization theory; Multidisciplinarity; Research foci; Sociology of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955683163     PISSN: 1381298X     EISSN: 15729346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10588-010-9076-0     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Ahlgren P, Jarneving B, Rousseau R (2003) Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to pearson's correlation coefficient. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54: 550-560.
2. Ashworth MJ, Carley KM (2007) Can tools help unify organization theory: perspectives on the state of computational modelling. Comput Math Organ Theory 13: 89-111.
3. Bricker R (1988) Knowledge preservation in accounting: a citational study. Abacus 24: 120-131.
4. Burton RM, Obel B (1995) The validity of computational models in organization science: from model realism to purpose of the model. Comput Math Organ Theory 1: 57-71.
5. Carley KM (1995) Computational and mathematical organization theory: perspective and directions. Comput Math Organ Theory 1: 39-56.
6. Carley KM, Wallace WA (1995) Editorial. Comput Math Organ Theory 1: 5-7.
7. Carley KM, Reminga J, Storrick J, DeReno M (2009) ORA user's guide 2009, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report CMU-ISR-09-115.
8. Chan KC, Liano K (2009) Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions and researchers in accounting. Account Finance 49: 49-74.
9. Charvet FF, Cooper MC, Gardner JT (2008) The intellectual structure of supply chain management: a bibliometric approach. J Bus Logist 29: 47-73.
10. Chen C, Paul RJ (2001) Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Computer 34: 65-71.
11. Clauset A, ME Newman, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E 70.
12. Coen C (2009) Simple but not simpler. Comput Math Organ Theory 15: 1-4.
13. Cole S (1983) The hierarchy of the sciences? Am J Sociol 89: 111-139.
14. Cole S (2004) Merton's contribution to the sociology of science. Soc Stud Sci 34: 829-844.
15. Crane D (1972) Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Cronin B (1984) The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham, London.
17. Franklin JJ (1988) Testing and using quantitative methods in science policy contexts: a response to Hicks. Sci Soc Stud 18: 365-375.
18. Gilbert N (1997) A simulation of the structure of academic science. Socio Res Online 2.
19. Gmür M (2003) Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: a methodological evaluation. Scientometrics 57: 27-57.
20. Hicks D (1987) Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy. Soc Stud Sci 17: 295-316.
21. Hicks D (1988) Limitations and more limitations of co-citation analysis/bibliometric modelling: a reply to Franklin. Soc Stud Sci 18: 375-384.
22. Klavans R, Boyack KW (2006) Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57: 251-263.
23. Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Lunin LF, White HD (1990) Author cocitation analysis, introduction. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 41: 429-432.
25. McCain KW (1986) Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. J Am Soc Inf Sci 37: 111-122.
26. Merton RK (1979) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Merton RK, Zuckerman H (1972) Age, aging, and age structure in science. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
28. Meyer M, Lorscheid I, Troitzsch KG (2009) The development of social simulation as reflected in the first ten years of JASSS: a citation and co-citation analysis. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 12.
29. Moed HF (2002) The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits. Nature 415: 731-732.
30. Mullins NC, Hargens LL, Hecht PK, Kick EL (1977) The group structure of cocitation clusters: a comparative study. Am Sociol Rev 42: 552-562.
31. Nerur SP, Natarajan V Rasheed AA (2008) The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strateg Manag J 29: 319-336.
32. Osareh F (1996a) Bibliometrics citation analysis and co-citation analysis I: a review of literature. Libri 46: 149-158.
33. Osareh F (1996b) Bibliometrics citation analysis and co-citation analysis II: a review of literature. Libri 46: 217-225.
34. Ponzi LJ (2002) The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: a bibliometric study of its early stage of development. Scientometrics 55: 259-272.
35. Prus RC (1996) Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. State University of New York Press, New York.
36. Ramos-Rodriguez AR, Ruiz-Navarro J (2004) Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal. Strateg Manag J 25: 981-1004.
37. Samuelson D (2000) Designing organizations. OR/MS Today, 1-4.
38. Samuelson D, Macal C (2006) Agent-based simulation comes of age. OR/MS Today 33: 34-38.
39. Small HG (1978) Cited documents as concept symbols. Soc Stud Sci 8: 327-340.
40. Small HG (1980) Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. J Doc 36: 183-196.
41. Tempest D (2009) Breaking boundaries: patterns in interdisciplinary citation. http://www. info. scopus. com/researchtrends/archive/RT11/bib_mes_11. html, download: February 5th 2010.
42. Thackray A, Merton RK (1972) On discipline building: the paradoxes of George Sarton. Isis 63: 473-495.
43. Valverde S, Solé RV, Bedau MA, Packard N (2007) Topology and evolution of technology innovation networks. Phys Rev E 76: 56118.