Project time calculation and optimization based on DSM activities overlapping

Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 496-504

  Yang, Qing ^a   Huang, Jian Mei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING   (China)

Author keywords

Activities overlapping; Activity sequence optimization; Design structure matrix; Project management; Project time calculation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OVERLAPPING; ACTIVITY SEQUENCE; DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX; DSM (DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX ); MODE-BASED; PROJECT ACTIVITIES; PROJECT DURATION; PROJECT SCHEDULES; PROJECT TIME CALCULATION; TIME FACTORS; TIME MODEL;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 79955652358     PISSN: 10006788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chen C H, Ling S L, Chen W. Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003(21): 291-299.
2. Smith P, Reinertsen D. Developing Products in Half the Time[M]. 2nd ed. NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995.
3. Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling[M]. 8th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2003: 481-482.
4. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®Guide)[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2005: 132-134.
5. Cho S H, Eppinger S D. A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 2005, 52(3): 316-327.
6. Yang Q, Qiu W H. The research on principle and approach of lean value management[J]. Chinese Journal of Science Research Management, 2007, 28(4): 149-154.
7. Browning T R. Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2001(3): 292-306.
8. Cho S H, Eppinger S D. Product development process modeling using advanced simulation[C]//Proceedings of DETC'01 ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, September 9-12, 2001.
9. Maheswari J U. Varghese K. Project scheduling using dependency structure matrix[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005(23): 223-230.
10. Bai S J, Wang X B. Project schedule cycle based on design structure matrix[J]. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2008, 28(11): 51-54.
11. Browning T R, Eppinger S D. Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 2002, 49(4): 428-440.
12. Yassine A. An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development process using the design structure matrix (DSM) method[J]. Quaderni di Management (Italian Management Review), 2004(9): 8-9.
13. Meier C, Yassine A, Browning T R. Design process sequencing with competent genetic algorithms[J]. Transactions of ASME, 2007, 129(6): 556-558.
14. Sheng H T, Wei F J. The research and application of genetic-based design structure matrix optimization algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(4): 98-104.
15. Li M Q, Kou J S, Lin D. The Basic Theory and Application of Genetic Algorithms[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
16. Gebala D A, Eppinger S D. Methods for analyzing design procedures[C]//Proceedings of the ASME Third International Conference on Design Theory and methodology, Miami, FL, 1991.
17. Steward D V. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1981, 28(3): 71-74.
18. Browning T R. Use of dependency structure matrices for product development cycle time reduction[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, Tokyo, Japan, July 15-17, 1998.