Development and validation of a complementary map to enhance the existing 1998 to 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale map

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Palmer, Cameron S ^a   Franklyn, Melanie ^b   Read Allsopp, Christine ^c   McLellan, Susan ^d   Niggemeyer, Louise E ^e  

^a ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management   (Australia)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INJURY; INJURY SCALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; VALIDATION STUDY;

ABBREVIATED INJURY SCALE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; VICTORIA; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955649327     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17577241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-29     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The Abbreviated Scale. JAMA 1971, 215:277-280. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety.
2. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E, . (Eds) The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 - Update 2008 2008, Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, (Eds).
3. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974, 14:187-196. 10.1097/00005373-197403000-00001, 4814394.
4. Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 1997, 43:922-925. 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00009, 9420106.
5. Cameron P, Palmer C. Developing consensus on injury coding. Injury 2011, 42:10-11. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.035, 21112586.
6. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine The Abbreviated Injury Scale 1990 Revision - Update 98 1998, Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
7. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E, . (Eds) The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 2005, Barrington, IL: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, (Eds).
8. Barnes J, Hassan A, Cuerden R, Cookson R, Kohlhofer J. Comparison of injury severity between AIS 2005 and AIS 1990 in a large injury database. Ann Adv Automot Med 2009, 53:83-89.
9. Palmer CS, Franklyn M. Assessment of the effects and limitations of the 1998 to 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale map using a large population-based dataset. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011, 19:1. 10.1186/1757-7241-19-1, 3026049, 21214906.
10. Palmer CS, Niggemeyer LN, Charman D. Double coding and mapping using Abbreviated Injury Scale 1998 and 2005: Identifying issues for trauma data. Injury 2010, 41:948-954. 10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.016, 20074729.
11. Civil ID, Ross SE, Schwab CW. AIS-85 versus AIS-80: A Comparison of Scoring in Penetrating Trauma. Ann Proc Am Assoc Automot Med 1987, 31:125-132.
12. Civil ID, Streat SJ, Judson JA. A comparison of AIS-85 with AIS-80 for injury scaling in blunt trauma. Accid Anal Prev 1990, 22:13-18. 10.1016/0001-4575(90)90003-4, 2322367.
13. Copes WS, Lawnick M, Champion HR, Sacco WJ. A comparison of Abbreviated Injury Scale 1980 and 1985 versions. J Trauma 1988, 28:78-86. 10.1097/00005373-198801000-00011, 3339666.
14. Royal Perth Hospital Royal Perth Hospital Trauma Services Report - 2007. Perth 2008, Royal Perth Hospital., http://www.rph.wa.gov.au/pdf/Trauma_Report_2007.pdf
15. Salottolo K, Settell A, Uribe P, Akin S, Slone DS, O'Neal E, Mains C, Bar-Or D. The impact of the AIS 2005 revision on injury severity scores and clinical outcome measures. Injury 2009, 40:999-1003. 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.013, 19524239.
16. Wang D, Lu L. Assessment of the injury severity score in evaluation of multiple maxillofacial injuries. Chin J Stomatol 2008, 43:646-649.
17. Dalkey NC. Delphi. 1967, Rand Corporation., http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/2006/P3704.pdf
18. Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, Cooper DJ, Walker T, Judson R, McNeil J. A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival. Med J Aust 2008, 189:546-550.
19. Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Hensberry R, Osler TM. A note on the disjointed nature of the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 2004, 57:479-487. 10.1097/01.TA.0000141024.96440.7C, 15454791.
20. Byrt T. How good is that agreement?. Epidemiology 1996, 7:561.
21. MacKenzie EJ, Shapiro S, Eastham JN. The Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score - levels of inter- and intrarater reliability. Med Care 1985, 23:823-835. 10.1097/00005650-198506000-00008, 3925257.
22. Sheskin D. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures 2004, New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 3.
23. Aickin M, Gensler H. Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni & Holm methods. Am J Pub Health 1996, 86:726-728.
24. Brown L, Cai T, DasGupta A. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion and asymptotic expansions. Ann Stat 2002, 30:160-201.
25. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. AIS 2005: A contemporary injury scale. Injury 2006, 37:1083-1091. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009, 17092503.
26. Neale R, Rokkas P, McClure RJ. Interrater reliability of injury coding in the Queensland Trauma Registry. Emerg Med 2003, 15:38-41.
27. Zoltie N, deDombal FT. The hit and miss of ISS and TRISS. BMJ 1993, 307:906-909. 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.906, 1679045, 8241854.
28. Read-Allsopp C. Establishing inter-rater reliability scoring in a state trauma system. J Trauma Nurs 2004, 11:35-39.
29. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 1987, 27:370-378. 10.1097/00005373-198704000-00005, 3106646.
30. Carroll CP, Cochran JA, Price JP, Guse CE, Wang MC. The AIS-2005 Revision in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Mission Accomplished or Problems for Future Research?. Ann Adv Automot Med 2010, 54:233-238.
31. Skaga NO, Eken T, Hestnes M, Jones JM, Steen PA. Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90 - do the changes affect overall severity assessment?. Injury 2007, 38:84-90. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.123, 16872609.