Erratum to Selection Response Decomposition (SRD): A New Tool for Dissecting Differences and Similarities Between Matrices (Evol Biol, (2011), 38, (225-241), 10.1007/s11692-010-9107-2);Selection Response Decomposition (SRD): A New Tool for Dissecting Differences and Similarities Between Matrices

Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 225-241

  Marroig, Gabriel ^a,c   Melo, Diogo ^a   Porto, Arthur ^a,b   Sebastião, Harley ^a   Garcia, Guilherme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

G matrix; Random skewers; Selection gradient; V CV matrix

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955640788     PISSN: 00713260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-012-9192-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Abdala, F., Flores, D., and Giannini, N. P. (2001). Postweaning ontogeny of the skull of Didelphis albiventris. Journal of Mammalogy, 82, 190-200.
2. Arnold, S. J. (2005). The utlimate causes of phenotypic integration: Lost in translation (Book Review). Evolution, 59, 2059-2061.
3. Arnold, S. J., Pfrender, M. E., and Jones, A. G. (2001). The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica, 112(113), 9-32.
4. Cheverud, J. M. (1982). Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 59, 139-149.
5. Cheverud, J. M. (1988). A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution, 42, 958-968.
6. Cheverud, J. M. (1995). Morphological integration in the saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. The American Naturalist, 145, 63-89.
7. Cheverud, J. M. (1996). Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton-top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle-back (S. fuscicolis) tamarins. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 5-42.
8. Cheverud, J. M., and Marroig, G. (2007). Comparing covariance matrices: Random skewers method compared to the common principal components model. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 461-469.
9. Cowley, D. E., and Achtley, W. R. (1992). Comparison of quantitative genetic parameters. Evolution, 46, 1965-1967.
10. Falconer, D. S., and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
11. Houle, D., Mezey, J., and Galpern, P. (2002). Interpretation of the results of common principal components analyses. Evolution, 56, 433-440.
12. Krzanowski, W. J. (1979). Between-group comparisons of principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 703-707.
13. Lande, R. (1979). Quantitative genetic-analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution, 33, 402-416.
14. Lush, J. L. (1964). Melhoramento genético dos animais domésticos. Rio de Janeiro: Sedegra.
15. Lynch, M., and Walsh, J. B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assocs., Inc.
16. Marroig, G. (2007). When size makes a difference: allometry, life-history and morphological evolution of capuchins (Cebus) and squirrels (Saimiri) monkeys (Cebinae, Platyrrhini). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 7-20.
17. Marroig, G., and Cheverud, J. M. (2001). A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution, 55, 2576-2600.
18. Marroig, G., and Cheverud, J. M. (2010). Size as a line of least resistance II: Direct selection on size or correlated response due to constraints? Evolution, 64, 1470-1488.
19. Phillips, P. C., and Arnold, S. J. (1999). Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution, 53, 1506-1515.
20. Porto, A., Oliveira, F. B., Shirai, L. T., Conto, V., and Marroig, G. (2009). The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull I: Morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 118-135.
21. Roff, D. A. (1997). Evolutionary quantitative genetics. New York: Chapman and Hall.
22. Shaw, R. G. (1987). Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution, 41, 812-826.
23. Shirai, L. T., and Marroig, G. (2010). Skull modularity in neotropical marsupials and monkeys: Size variation and evolutionary constraint and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol. Dev. Evol.).
24. Smith, K. K. (1996). Integration of craniofacial structures during development in mammals. American Zoologist, 36, 70-79.
25. Smith, K. K. (1997). Comparative patterns of craniofacial development in eutherian and metatherian mammals. Evolution, 51, 1663-1678.
26. Smith, K. K. (2001). The evolution of mammalian development. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 156, 119-135.
27. Sokal, R. R., and Braumann, C. A. (1980). Significance tests for coefficients of variation and variability profiles. Systematic Zoology, 29, 50-66.
28. Steppan, S. J., Phillips, P. C., and Houle, D. (2002). Comparative quantitative genetics: Evolution of the G matrix. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 320-327.
29. Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H., and Mackenzie, R. B. (1976). Reproduction in Didelphis marsupialis and D. albiventris in Colombia. Journal of Mammalogy, 57, 249-265.