Effect of groundwater abstraction on fen ecosystems

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 402, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 357-366

  Johansen, Ole Munch ^a   Pedersen, Morten Lauge ^a   Jensen, Jacob Birk ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Data collection; Fen; Groundwater abstraction; Limestone aquifer; Natural spring; Wetland hydrology

Indexed keywords

DATA COLLECTION; FEN; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; LIMESTONE AQUIFER; NATURAL SPRING; WETLAND HYDROLOGY;

ABSTRACTING; ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; AQUIFERS; DATA ACQUISITION; ECOSYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROLOGY; LIMESTONE; PUMPS; RIVERS; SEDIMENTOLOGY; TRANSDUCERS; WATER LEVELS; WELLS;

WETLANDS;

AQUIFER; DATA ACQUISITION; FEN; GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LIMESTONE; PERMEABILITY; RIVER DISCHARGE; SEEPAGE; SPRING WATER; TERRAIN; WATER LEVEL; WETLAND;

EID: 79955623630     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.031     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andersen H.E., Hansen S., Jensen H.E. Evapotranspiration from a riparian fen wetland. Nord. Hydrol. 2005, 36(2):121-135.
2. Boomer K.M.B., Bedford B.L. Groundwater-induced redox-gradients control soil properties and phosphorus availability across four headwater wetlands, New York, USA. Biogeochemistry 2008, 90(3):259-274.
3. Bouwer H., Rice R.C. Slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12(3):423-428.
4. Cirkel D.G., Witte J.-M., van der Zee S.E.A.T.M. Estimating seepage intensities from groundwater level time series by inverse modelling: a sensitivity analysis on wet meadow scenarios. J. Hydrol. 2010, 385(1-4):132-142.
5. Detlefsen, N.K., Plauborg, F., 2001. Reconsideration of methods for calculation of reference evapotranspiration (potential evapotranspiration). Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences. DJF rapport Markbrug (in Danish) 61.
6. Devito K.J., Dillon P.J. The influence of hydrologic conditions and peat oxia on the phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics of a conifer swamp. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29(8):2675-2685.
7. Ellenberg H. Zeigerwerte der Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa 1991, Scripta Geobotanica. 18th ed.
8. Ertsen A.C.D., Alkemade J.R.M., Wassen M.J. Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 1998, 135(1):113-124.
9. Gnatowski T., Szatyłowicz J., Brandyk T., Kechavarzi C. Hydraulic properties of fen peat soils in Poland. Geoderma 2010, 154(3-4):188-195.
10. Hájek M., Horsák M., Hájková P., Dítě D. Habitat diversity of central European fens in relation to environmental gradients and an effort to standardise fen terminology in ecological studies. Perspect. Plant Ecol., Evolut. Syst. 2006, 8(2):97-114.
11. Haraguchi A., Hasegawa C., Hirayama A., Kojima H. Decomposition activity of peat soils in geogenous mires in Sasakami, central Japan. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2003, 39(4):191-196.
12. Ilomets M., Truus L., Pajula R., Sepp K. Species composition and structure of vascular plants and bryophytes on the water level gradient within a calcareous fen North Estonia. Est. J. Ecol. 2010, 59(1):19-38.
13. Mikkelsen H.E., Olesen J.E. Sammenligning af metoder til bestemmelse af potentielvandfordampning. Tidsskrift for Planteavls Specialserie Beretning nr 1991, S 2157.
14. Moore D.R.J., Keddy P.A., Gaudet C.L., Wisheu I.C. Conservation of wetlands: do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority?. Biol. Conserv. 1989, 47(3):203-217.
15. Röhrich, T., 2005. AquiferTest v. 4.0 User's Manual - Advanced Pumping Test & Slug Test Analysis Software.
16. Rosa E., Larocque M. Investigating peat hydrological properties using field and laboratory methods: application to the Lanoraie peatland complex (southern Quebec, Canada). Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22(12):1866-1875.
17. Runhaar H., Witte F., Verburg P. Ground-water level, moisture supply, and vegetation in the Netherlands. Wetlands 1997, 17(4):528-538.
18. Schaffers A.P., Sýkora K.V. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci. 2000, 11(2):225-244.
19. Schot P.P., Dekker S.C., Poot A. The dynamic form of rainwater lenses in drained fens. J. Hydrol. 2004, 293(1-4):74-84.
20. Van Diggelen R., Middleton B., Bakker J., Grootjans A., Wassen M. Fens and floodplains of the temperate zone: present status, threats, conservation and restoration. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2006, 9(2):157-162.
21. Van Haesebroeck V., Boeye D., Verhagen B., Verheyen R.F. Experimental investigation of drought induced acidification in a rich fen soil. Biogeochemistry 1997, 37(1):15-32.
22. van Loon A.H., Schot P.P., Griffioen J., Bierkens M.F.P., Batelaan O., Wassen M.J. Throughflow as a determining factor for habitat contiguity in a near-natural fen. J. Hydrol. 2009, 379(1-2):30-40.
23. Wamelink G.W.W., Joosten V., Van Dobben H.F., Berendse F. Validity of Ellenberg indicator values judged from physico-chemical field measurements. J. Veg. Sci. 2002, 13(2):269-278.
24. Wassen M.J., Venterink H.O., Lapshina E.D., Tanneberger F. Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 2005, 437(7058):547-550.