Ground-water level, moisture supply, and vegetation in the Netherlands

Wetlands

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 528-538

  Runhaar, Han ^a   Witte, Flip ^a   Verburg, Peter ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ground water level; Hydrophytes; Mesophytes; Moisture supply; Vegetation; Xerophytes

Indexed keywords

XEROPHYTA;

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; GROUND WATER LEVEL; MOISTURE SUPPLY; PLANT COMMUNITY;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 0031392846     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03161519     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bálatová-Tulácková, E. 1968. Grundwasserganglinien und Wiesengesellschaften. Acta sc. nat. Brno 2(2): 1-37.
2. Belmans, C., J. G. Wesseling, and R. A. Feddes. 1983. Simulation of a cropped soil: SWATRE. Journal of Hydrology 63:271-286.
3. Colenbrander, H. J., K. P. Blumenthal, W. Cramer, and A. Volker. 1989. Water in the Netherlands. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, The Netherlands. Proceedings and Information no. 37.
4. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31.
5. Davis, M. M., S. W. Sprecher, J. S. Wakeley, and G. R. Best. 1996. Environmental gradients and identification of wetlands in North-Central Florida. Wetlands 16:512-523.
6. Dirkse, G. M., H. M. H. van Melick, and A. Touw. 1988. Checklist of Dutch Bryophytes. Lindbergia 14:167-175.
7. Dirkse, G. M. and B. W. J. M. Kruijsen. 1993. Classification into ecological groups of the mosses and liverworts of the Netherlands. Gorteria 10:1-29. (in Dutch, with English summary)
8. Ellenberg H., H. E. Weber, R. Dull, V. Wirth, W. Werner, and D. Pauliszen. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18, 2nd edition. Goltze, Göttingen.
9. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report Y-78-1.
10. Etherington, J. R. 1982. Environment and plant ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
11. Gremmen, N. J. M. 1987. Natuurtechnisch model voor de beschrijving en voorspelling van effecten van veranderingen in waterregime op de waarde van een gebied vanuit natuurbehoudsoogpunt. Deel 1: Uitgangspunten en modelconcept. Utrecht, Studiecommissie Natuur, Bos en Landschap. Rapport le.
12. Hald, A. B. and P. M. Petersen. 1992. Soil and vegetation in two Danish fens following changes in water regime. Nordic Journal of Botany 12:707-732.
13. Iversen, J. 1936. Biologische Pflanzentypen als Hilfsmittel in der Vegetationsforschung. Levin and Munksgaard, Kopenhagen, Denmark.
14. Josselyn, M. N. 1990. Relationships between seasonally wet soils and occurence of wetland plants in California. Wetlands 10:7-26.
15. Kemmers, R. H. 1973. Invloed van het grondwaterregime op de vegetatie van een komgrondenreservaat. WLO-Mededelingen 6: 9-11.
16. Klapp, E. 1965. Grünlandvegetationen und Standort. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg, Germany.
17. Landolt, E. 1973. Pflanzen und nasse Standorte. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der Eidg. Techn. Hochschule st. Rübel, Zürich 51:8-14.
18. Londo, G. 1975. Nederlandse lijst van hydro-, freato- en afreatofyten. Rijksinstituut voor Natuurbeheer, Leersum, The Netherlands.
19. Londo, G. 1988. Dutch Phreatophytes. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands. (in Dutch, with English summary).
20. Marquardt, E. 1980. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2:431-441.
21. National Research Council, Committee on Characterization of Wetlands. 1995. Wetlands, characteristics and boundaries. National Acadamy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
22. Runhaar, J., C. L. G. Groen, R. Van der Meijden, and R. A. M. Stevers. 1987. A new division in ecological groups in the flora of the Netherlands. Gorteria 13:277-359. (in Dutch, with English summary)
23. Runhaar, J. 1989. Toetsing van het ecotopensysteem. Deel 2: Rapportage van het veldwerk. CML-mededeling 48b. Centrum voor Milieukunde, Leiden, The Netherlands.
24. Runhaar, J. and H. A. Udo de Haes. 1994. The use of site factors as classification characteristics for ecotopes. p. 139-172. In F. Klijn (ed.) Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
25. Runhaar, J., C. R. Van Gool, and C. L. G. Groen. 1996. Impact of hydrological changes on nature conservation areas in the Netherlands. Biological Conservation 76:269-276.
26. Reed, P. B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: 1988 national summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 88 (24).
27. Schimper, A. 1898. Pflanzen-Geographie auf physiologischer Grundlage. Jena, Germany.
28. Spoor, G., J. M. Chapman, and P. B. Leeds-Harrison 1992. Assessment of soil water requirements of wild plants species, p. 137-144. In Drainage and water table control. Proceedings of the 6th International Drainage Symposium. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Nashville, TN, USA.
29. Tiner, R. W. 1991. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. BioScience 41:236-247.
30. Tiner, R. W. 1993a. The primary indicators method - a practical approach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States. Wetlands 13:50-64.
31. Tiner, R. W. 1993b. Response to Watts' comment. Wetlands 13:311.
32. Tüxen, R. 1954. Pflanzengesellschaften und Grundwasserganglinien. Angew. Pflanzensoziol., Stolzenau/Weser 8:61-98.
33. Van der Meijden, R. 1990. Heukel's Flora van Nederland. 21. edition. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands.
34. Van der Sluijs, P. and J. J. de Gruijter. 1985. Water table classes: A method to describe seasonal fluctuation and duration of water table classes on Dutch soil maps. Agricultural Water Management. 10:109-125.
35. Verburg, P. H. 1995. De relatie tussen de vochttoestand van de bodem en de vochtindicatie van de vegetatie. Een nadere bepaling van de grens tussen 'vochtig' en 'droog' binnen het ecotopensysteem. Landbouw-Universiteit Wageningen, Vakgroep Waterhuishouding, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Rapport 62.
36. Walter, H. 1926. Die Anpassungen der Pflanzen an Wassermangel. Das xerophytenproblem in kausal-physiologischer Betrachtung. Naturwissenschaft und Landwirtschaft 9:1-115.
37. Watts, F. C. 1993. Comment on R.W. Tiner: The primary indicators method - a practical aproach to wetland recognition and delineation in the United States. Wetlands 13:311.
38. Witte, J. P. M. and R. Van der Meijden. 1995. Verspreidingskaarten van de botanische kwaliteit in Nederland uit FLORBASE. Gorteria 21:3-59.
39. Witte, J. P. M., F. Klijn, F. A. M. Claessen, C. L. G. Groen, and R. Van der Meijden. 1992. A model to predict and assess the impacts of hydrological changes on terrestrial ecosystems in the Netherlands, and its use in a climate scenario. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:69-83.
40. Witte, J. P. M., C. L. G. Groen, R. Van der Meijden, and J. G. Nienhuis. 1993. DEMNAT: A national model for the effects of water management on the vegetation, p. 31-51. In J. C. Hooghart and C. W. S. Posthumus (ed.) The use of hydro-ecological models in the Netherlands. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, Delft, The Netherlands. Proceedings and Information no. 47.
41. Zarzycki, K. 1956. Meadow associations and the ground-water level. Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences. Cl.II, Vol. 4(5): 183-187.