Ultrasound-guided (Needle-in-Plane) perineural catheter insertion: The effect of catheter-insertion distance on postoperative analgesia

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-265

  Ilfeld, Brian M ^a   Sandhu, Navparkash S ^a   Loland, Vanessa J ^a   Madison, Sarah J ^a   Suresh, Preetham J ^a   Mariano, Edward R ^a   Bishop, Michael L ^a   Schwartz, Alexandra K ^b   Lee, Daniel K ^b  

^a University of California at San Diego   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEPIVACAINE; OPIATE; ROPIVACAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATHETER DISLODGEMENT; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID LEAKAGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE BLOCK; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POPLITEAL ARTERY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCIATIC NERVE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ULTRASOUND GUIDED (NEEDLE IN PLANE) PERINEURAL CATHETER INSERTION;

ADULT; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; AUTONOMIC NERVE BLOCK; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PERONEAL NERVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCIATIC NERVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 79955622327     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820f3b80     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ilfeld BM, Fredrickson MJ, Mariano ER. Ultrasound-guided perineural catheter insertion: three approaches but few illuminating data. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:123-126.
2. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, et al. Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:919-926.
3. Gray AT. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:368-373.
4. Dhir S, Ganapathy S. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:1158-1166.
5. Salinas FV, Neal JM, Sueda LA, Kopacz DJ, Liu SS. Prospective comparison of continuous femoral nerve block with nonstimulating catheter placement versus stimulating catheter-guided perineural placement in volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:212-220. (Pubitemid 38685816)
6. Neal JM, Chan V. Ultrasound and regional anesthesia: a new section in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:373-374. (Pubitemid 47600020)
7. Todd MM. Clinical research manuscripts in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1051-1053. (Pubitemid 33043216)
8. Singelyn FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:383-386. (Pubitemid 27061409)
9. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, Enneking FK. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:959-965.
10. Ilfeld BM, Thannikary LJ, Morey TE, Vander Griend RA, Enneking FK. Popliteal sciatic perineural local anesthetic infusion: a comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:970-977. (Pubitemid 39288048)
11. Salinas FV. Location, location, location: continuous peripheral nerve blocks and stimulating catheters. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:79-82. (Pubitemid 36397779)
12. Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:254-259.
13. Mariano ER, Cheng GS, Choy LP, et al. Electrical stimulation versus ultrasound guidance for popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:480-485.
14. Niazi AU, Prasad A, Ramlogan R, Chan VW. Methods to ease placement of stimulating catheters during in-plane ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:380-381.
15. Fegley AJ, Lerman J,Wissler R. Epidural multiorifice catheters function as single-orifice catheters: an in vitro study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1079-1081.
16. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Delivery rate accuracy of portable, bolus-capable infusion pumps used for patient-controlled continuous regional analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:17-23. (Pubitemid 36176683)
17. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. New portable infusion pumps: real advantages or just more of the same in a different package? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:371-376. (Pubitemid 39055667)
18. NaikAD,PetersenLA.The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1929-1931.
19. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness researchVimplications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: 328-330.
20. Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness researchVIOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325-328.
21. Swenson JD, Davis JJ, DeCou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1015-1016. (Pubitemid 351301434)
22. Ilfeld BM, Le LT, Ramjohn J, et al. The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:345-350.
23. Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Gerancher JC, et al. The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:701-707.