Production control in a failure-prone manufacturing network using discrete event simulation and automated response surface methodology

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 35-46

  Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba ^a   Esfahani, Mir Mehdi Seyed ^a   Sörensen, Kenneth ^b  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Automated response surface methodology; Discrete event simulation; Experimental design; Failure prone manufacturing system

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; AUTOMATED RESPONSE; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; CONTROL POLICY; CONTROL PROBLEMS; DEMAND RATES; DEPENDENT FAILURE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FAILURE-PRONE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM; HEDGING POINT; MAINTENANCE POLICY; MULTIPLE PRODUCTS; PRODUCTION RATES; PRONE MANUFACTURING; STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL CONTROL; WORK IN PROCESS;

AUTOMATION; DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MACHINE DESIGN; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; PRODUCTION CONTROL; REPAIR; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

MANUFACTURE;

EID: 79955615622     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2814-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Older GJ, Suri R (1980) Time operational part-routing in manufacturing system with failure prone machines. In: Proc. 19th conf. decis. control, Albuquerque, NW
2. Kimemia JG (1982) Hierarchical control of production in flexible manufacturing systems. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
3. Kimemia JG, Gershwin SB (1983) An algorithm for the computer control of production in felxible manufacturing system. IIE Trans 15:353-362
4. Rishel R (1975) Control of systems with jump Markov disturbances. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 20:241-244
5. Akella PR, Kumar PR (1986) Optimal control of production rate in a failure prone manufacturing system. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-31(2):116-126 (Pubitemid 16575324)
6. Bielecki T, Kumar PR (1988) Optimality of zero-inventory policies for unreliable manufacturing systems, operations research archives. 36(4):532-541
7. Sharifnia A (1988) Production control of manufacturing system with multiple machine states. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 33(7)
8. Xie X (1989) Optimal control in a failure prone manufacturing system, a research for INRIA-LORRAINE Institute
9. Boukas EK, Yang H (1996) Manufacturing flow control and preventive maintenance: a stochastic control approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 41(6):881-885 (Pubitemid 126767940)
10. Kenne JP, Gharbi A, Boukas EK (1997) Control policy simulation based on machine age in a failure prone onemachine, one-product manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 35(5):1431-1445 (Pubitemid 127549675)
11. Mourania I, Hennequina S, Xie X (2006) Simulation-based optimization of a single-stage failure-prone manufacturing system with transportation delay. International of Production Economics
12. Kenne JP, Gharbi A (1999) Experimental design in the production and maintenance control problem of a single machine, single product manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 37(3):621-637
13. Kenne JP, Gharbi A, Beit M (2007) Age-dependent production planning and maintenance strategies in unreliable manufacturing systems with lost sale. Eur J Oper Res 178: 408-420 (Pubitemid 44750478)
14. Presman EL, Seti SP, Zhang H (2000) Average cost optimality for an unreliable two-machine flowshop with limited internal buffer. Ann Oper Res 98:333-351
15. ChingWK (2001) Markovian approximation for manufacturing systems of unreliablemachines in tandem. Nav Res Logist 48:65-78 (Pubitemid 32137149)
16. Gharbi A, Kenne JP (2005) Maintenance scheduling and production control of multiple-machine manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 48:693-707 (Pubitemid 40391491)
17. Gharbi A, Kenne JP (2000) Production and preventive maintenance rates control for manufacturing system: an experimental design approach. Int J Prod Econ 65:275-287
18. Boukas EK, HaurieA(1990) Manufacturing flow control and preventive maintenance: a stochastic control approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 33(9):1024-1031
19. Kokotovic P, Khalil HP, O'Relly J (1986) Singular perturbation methods in control: analysis and design. Academic Press, New York
20. Neddermeijer HG, Gerrit J, Oortmarssen V, Piersma N, Dekker R (2000) A frame work for response surface methodology for simulation optimization. In: Proceedings of the 32nd conference on winter simulation, Orlando, Florida, 10-13 December 2000
21. Nicolai RP, Dekker R, Piersma N, Oortmarssen JG (2004) Automated response surface methodology for stochastic optimization models with unknown variance. In: Proceedings of the 36th winter simulation conference,Washington, D.C., 5-8 December 2004
22. Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
23. Pritsker AAB, O'Reilly JJ, LaVal DK (1999) Simulation with visual SLAM and AweSim. Wiley, New York
24. Box, GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc B13:1-38, discussion, 38-45
25. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, USA