Influence of pulsed magnetic fields on the morphology of bone cells in early stages of growth

Micron

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 600-607

  Noriega Luna, Berenice ^a   Sabanero, Myrna ^a   Sosa, Modesto ^a   Avila Rodriguez, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUANAJUATO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Bone cells; Cytoskeletal proteins; Morphology; Osteoblasts; Pulsed magnetic fields

Indexed keywords

BONE CELLS; CELL DENSITY; CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS; F-ACTIN; FIELD APPLICATION; HUMAN OSTEOBLAST; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; LIVING SYSTEMS; MECHANISM OF ACTION; NUCLEAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN CONTENTS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PULSED MAGNETIC FIELDS;

BONE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR PHYSICS; OSTEOBLASTS;

PROTEINS;

ACTIN; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BONE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CYTOLOGY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HUMAN; MAGNETISM; MICROFILAMENT; MICROTUBULE; OSTEOBLAST; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ACTINS; BONE AND BONES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MICROFILAMENTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROTUBULES; OSTEOBLASTS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS;

EID: 79955589097     PISSN: 09684328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aaron R.K., Ciombor M.D., Keeping H., Wang S., Capuano A., Polk C. Power frequency promote cell differentiation coincident with an increase in transforming growth factor-β1 expression. Bioelectromagnetics 1999, 20:453-458.
2. Chang K., Chang W.H.S., Wu M.L., Shih C. Effects of different intensities of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on formation of osteoclast-like cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2003, 24:431-439.
3. Chang K., Chang W.H. The influence of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on osteopenia in an ovariectomized female rat model. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society 2001.
4. Chang W.H-S., Chen L.T., Sun J.S., Lin F.H. Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics 2004, 25:457-465.
5. Chang K., Chang W.H., Huang S., Huang S., Shih C. Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation affects osteoclast formation by modulation of osteoprotegerin, RANK ligand and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Orthop. Res. 2005, 23:1308-1314.
6. De Mattei M., Caruso A., Traina G.C., Pezzetti F., Baroni T., Sollazzo V. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cell in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 1999, 20:117-182.
7. Dini L., Abbro L. Bioeffects on moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on cell cultures. Micron 2005, 36:195-217.
8. Diniz P., Shomura K., Soejima K., Ito G. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 2002, 23(5):398-405.
9. Gartzke J., Lange K. Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2002, 283:C1333-C1346.
10. Kroupová J., Bártová E., Fojt L., Strašák L., Kozubek S., Vetterl V. Low-frequency magnetic field effect on cytoskeleton and chromatin. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 70:96-100.
11. Laemmli U. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227:680-685.
12. Liboff A.R., Williams T., Strong D.M., Wistar R. Time-varying magnetic fields: effect on DNA synthesis. Science 1984, 223:818-820.
13. Martino C.F., Belchenko D., Ferguson V., Nielsen-Preiss S., Qi H.J. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the cellular activity of SaOS-2 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29:125-132.
14. Meza I., Ibarra G., Sabanero M., Martínez P.A., Cerejido M. Occluding functions and cytoskeleton components in cultured transporting epithelium. J. Cell Biol. 1980, 87:746-754.
15. Miyakoshi J. Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2005, 87:213-223.
16. Pacini S., Vannelli G.B., Barni T., Ruggiero M., Sardi I., Pacini P., Gulisano M. Effect of 0.2T static magnetic field on human neurons: remodeling and inhibition of signal transduction without genome instability. Neurosci. Lett. 1999, 267:185-188.
17. Pacini S., Gulisano M., Peruzzi B., Sgambati E., Gheri G., Bryk S.G., Vannucchi S., Polli G., Ruggiero M. Effects of 0.2mT static magnetic field on human skin fibroblasts. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2003, 27:327-332.
18. Rosen A.D. Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 39:163-173.
19. Sato K., Yamaguchi H., Miyamoto H., Kinouchi Y. Growth of human cultured cells exposed to a non-homogeneous static magnetic field generated by Sm-Co magnets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1136:231-238.
20. Schwartz Z., Fisher M., Lohmann C.H., Simon B.J., Boyan B.D. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) production by cells in the osteoblast lineage is regulated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultures grown on calcium phosphate substrates. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37:437-444.
21. Sun L.Y., Hsieh D.K., Yu T.C., Chiu H.T., Luo G.H., Kuo T.K., Lee O.K., Chiou T.W. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on the proliferation and differentiation potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 30:251-260.
22. Yamamoto Y., Ohsaki Y., Goto T., Nakasima A., Iijima T. Effects of static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast cultures. J. Dent. Res. 2003, 82(12):962-966.