The food and drug administration is now preparing to establish tighter performance requirements for blood glucose monitors

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 499-504

  Klonoff, David C ^a  

^a DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Food and Drug Administration; Glucose; Interfering substances; Monitor; Self monitoring of blood glucose

Indexed keywords

BLOOD EXAMINATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; HEMATOLOGIC TESTS; HUMANS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 78349287412     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400301     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems - requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO 15197:2003. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso- catalogue/catalogue-tc/catalogue-detail.htm?csnumber=26309. Accessed March 20, 2010.
2. Yusuf A. Seismic upgrades of healthcare facilities. J Healthc Resour Manag. 1997;15(5):28-31.
3. Boren SA, Clarke WL. Analytical and clinical performance of blood glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):84-97.
4. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):75-83.
5. McEnroe RJ, Burritt MF, Powers DM, Rheinheimer DW, Wallace BH. Interference testing in clinical chemistry; approved guideline - second edition. CLSI document EP7-A2. Wayne; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: 2005. http://www.clsi.org/source/orders/free/ep7a2f.pdf.
6. Raine CH 3rd, Pardo S, Parkes JL. Predicted blood glucose from insulin administration based on values from miscoded glucose meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(4):557-62.
7. Breton M, Kovatchev B. Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2009;4(3):562-70.
8. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):971-80.
9. Ginsberg BH. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):903-13.
10. Bamberg R, Schulman K, MacKenzie M, Moore J, Olchesky S. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18(4):203-9.
11. Thompson ND, Perz JF. Eliminating the blood: ongoing outbreaks of hepatitis B virus infection and the need for innovative glucose monitoring technologies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(2):283-8.
12. Keegan MT, Goldberg ME, Torjman MC, Coursin DB. Perioperative and critical illness dysglycemia - controlling the iceberg. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(6):1288-91.
13. Wahl HG. How accurately do we measure blood glucose levels in intensive care unit (ICU) patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23(4):387-400.