Minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with endometrial cancer

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 226-234

  Frumovitz, Michael ^a   Escobar, Pedro ^b   Ramirez, Pedro T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Endometrial cancer; hysterectomy; laparoscopy; lymphadenectomy; minimally invasive; robotics

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; UTERUS SURGERY; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; ROBOTICS;

EID: 79955551185     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318218637d     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Gross GM, et al. Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer: laparotomy versus laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1795-1179; discussion 1179-1800.
2. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer-a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:239-244. (Pubitemid 32158465)
3. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, et al. Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:4-9. (Pubitemid 40403667)
4. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:5331-5336.
5. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, et al. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5337-5342.
6. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:130-136. (Pubitemid 40800367)
7. Zullo F, Palomba S, Falbo A, et al. Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:296e1-296e9.
8. Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:415-421.
9. Kohler C, Klemm P, Schau A, et al. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 95:52-61. (Pubitemid 39286277)
10. Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, et al. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy-a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:418-424.
11. Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, et al. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:236-243.
12. Seamon LG, Cohn DE,HenrettaMS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:36-41.
13. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:360e1-360e9.
14. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1422-1431.
15. Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:16-21.
16. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:407-411.
17. Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, et al. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot versus laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:500-503.
18. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, et al. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.ObstetGynecol. 2010;116:685-693.
19. Wheeless CR Jr. An inexpensive laparoscopy system for female sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;123:727-733.
20. Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:157-161.
21. Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, et al. Singleport-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2248-2252.
22. Fader AN, Rojas-Espaillat L, Ibeanu O, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecology: a multiinstitutional evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:501e1-501e6.
23. Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:331-338.
24. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasool N, et al. Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:1268-1273.