Technical modification for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to minimize testicular pain: A complication with significant morbidity

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1031-1034

  Shirodkar, S P ^a   Gorin, M A ^a   Sageshima, J ^b   Bird, V G ^a   Martinez, J M ^a   Zarak, A ^b   Guerra, G ^b   Chen, L ^b   Burke, G W ^b   Ciancio, G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Division of Transplantation   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; donor nephrectomy; laparoscopy; orchalgia; testicular pain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISSECTION; GONADAL VEIN; HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; KIDNEY DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCROTAL PAIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER; VEIN; VEIN LIGATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEPHRECTOMY; PAIN; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RENAL VEINS; TESTIS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 79955526498     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03495.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Shirodkar SP, Sageshima J, Bird VG, et al,. Living donor nephrectomy: University of Miami technique and current results. Arch Esp Urol 2010; 63: 163-170.
2. Dolce CJ, Keller JE, Walters KC, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1564-1568.
3. Kieran K, Roberts WW,. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: An update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2005; 14: 599-603. (Pubitemid 41531853)
4. Nicholson ML, Kaushik M, Lewis GR, et al,. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 21-28.
5. Waller JR, Hiley AL, Mullin EJ, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML,. Living kidney donation: A comparison of laparoscopic and conventional open operations. Postgrad Med J 2002; 78: 153-157. (Pubitemid 34229622)
6. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR,. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 709-719. (Pubitemid 34028035)
7. Shafizadeh S, McEvoy JR, Murray C, et al,. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Impact on an established renal transplant program. Am Surg 2000; c66: 1132-1135. (Pubitemid 32003413)
8. Reddy KS, Mastrangelo M, D Johnston T, et al,. Recipient outcome following living donor kidney transplantation using kidneys procured laparoscopically. Clin Transplant 2003; 17(Suppl 9): 44-47. (Pubitemid 36958184)
9. Minnee RC, Bemelman F, Kox C, et al,. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy in living donors. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 206-209. (Pubitemid 351316942)
10. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, IJzermans JN,. Donor nephrectomy: Mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006; 81: 881-887.
11. Øyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, et al,. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: Experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236-1240. (Pubitemid 40664031)
12. Kim FJ, Pinto P, Su LM, et al,. Ipsilateral orchialgia after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 2003; 17: 405-409. (Pubitemid 36999359)
13. Gjertson CK, Sundaram CP,. Testicular pain following laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol 2008; 180: 2037-2040.
14. Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al,., Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol 2005; 173: 42-47. (Pubitemid 39627668)