Statistical transfer systems for French-English and German-English machine translation

3rd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT 2008 at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 163-166

  Hanneman, Greg ^a   Huber, Edmund ^a   Agarwal, Abhaya ^a   Ambati, Vamshi ^a   Parlikar, Alok ^a   Peterson, Erik ^a   Lavie, Alon ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; MACHINE TRANSLATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

FRENCH-ENGLISH; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; PARALLEL CORPORA; PERFORMANCE; TEST SETS; TRANSFER MACHINES; TRANSFER RULES; TRANSFER SYSTEMS; WORD ALIGNMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION;

EID: 79955496052     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Salah Aït-Mokhtar, Jean-Pierre Chanod, and Claude Roux. 2001. A multi-input dependency parser. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, Beijing, China, October.
2. Chris Callison-Burch, Cameron Fordyce, Philipp Koehn, Christof Monz, and Josh Schroeder. 2007. (Meta-) evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 136-158, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
3. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, pages 3-10. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Alon Lavie and Abhaya Agarwal. 2007. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 228-231, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
5. Alon Lavie, Alok Parlikar, and Vamshi Ambati. 2008. Syntax-driven learning of sub-sentential translation equivalents and translation rules from parsed parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation, Columbus, OH, June. To appear.
6. Alon Lavie. 2008. Stat-XFER: A general search-based syntax-driven framework for machine translation. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 362-375. Springer.
7. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-51.
8. Daniel Ortiz-Martínez, Ismael García-Varea, and Francisco Casacuberta. 2005. Thot: A toolkit to train phrase-based models for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 10th Machine Translation Summit, pages 141-148, Phuket, Thailand, September.
9. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evalution of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, PA, July.
10. Helmut Schmid. 1995. Improvements in part-of-speech tagging with an application to German. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT Workshop.
11. Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz, Linnea Micciulla, and John Makhoul. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pages 223-231, Cambridge, MA, August.