Situational power moderates the influence of Self-Transcendence vs. Self-Enhancement values on behavior in ultimatum bargaining

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 336-339

  Lönnqvist, Jan Erik ^a   Walkowitz, Gari ^b,c   Verkasalo, Markku ^a   Wichardt, Philipp C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Moral behavior; Person situation interaction; Personal values; Power; Self Enhancement; Self Transcendence; Ultimatum bargaining

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955484727     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bardi A.B., Schwartz S.H. Value and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29:1207-1220.
2. Batson C.D., Bowers M.J., Leonard E.A., Smith E.C. Does personal morality exacerbate or restrain retaliation after being harmed?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:35-45.
3. Camerer C. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction 2003, Princeton University Press, New York.
4. Caprara G.V., Schwartz S., Capanna C., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology 2006, 27:1-28.
5. Chen S., Lee-Chai A.Y., Bargh J.A. Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:183-187.
6. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114:817-868.
7. Güth W., Schmidt C., Sutter M. Bargaining outside the lab - A newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game. The Economic Journal 2007, 117:442-448.
8. Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1982, 3:367-388.
9. Lönnqvist J.-E., Walkowitz G., Wichardt P., Lindeman M., Verkasalo M. The moderating effect of conformism values on the relations between other personal values, social norms, moral obligation, and single altruistic behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 48:525-546.
10. Magee J.C., Gruenfeld D.H., Keltner D.J., Galinsky A.D. Leadership and the psychology of power. The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research 2005, 275-293. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. D.M. Messick, R.M. Kramer (Eds.).
11. McClelland D.C. Human motivation 1985, Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview, IL.
12. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology 1992, Vol. 25:1-65. Academic Press, New York.
13. Schwartz S.H., Melech G., Lehmann A., Burgess S., Harris M., Owens V. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2001, 32:519-542.
14. Shavitt S., Lalwani A., Zhang J., Torelli C. The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2006, 16:325-342.
15. Tarkkonen L., Vehkalahti K. Measurement errors in multivariate measurement scales. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2005, 96:172-189.
16. Van Dijk E., De Cremer D. Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating role of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:1352-1361.
17. Verkasalo M., Lönnqvist J.-E., Lipsanen J., Helkama K. European norms and equations for a two-dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz's 21-item portrait values questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 39:780-792.
18. Verplanken B., Holland R.W. Motivated decision making. Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:434-447.