Responses to intruder scents in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: Sex and social status differences and temporal variation

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 594-600

  Mares, Rafael ^a   Young, Andrew J ^b   Levesque, Danielle L ^a,c   Harrison, Nicola ^a   Clutton Brock, Tim H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

extragroup mating; mate defense; mate guarding; presentation experiment; prospecting; reproductive conflict; scent marking; Suricata suricatta

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COOPERATIVE BREEDING; FECES; SCENT MARKING; SEX DETERMINATION; SMALL MAMMAL; SOCIAL STATUS; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

MAMMALIA; SURICATA SURICATTA;

EID: 79955453674     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr021     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 59:390-412.
2. Bates D, Maechler M. 2010. lme4: linear mixed effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-33 [cited 2011 March 07]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/ index.html.
3. Bowyer RT, Vanballenberghe V, Rock KR. 1994. Scent marking by Alaskan moose: characteristics and spatial distribution of rubbed trees. Can J Zool. 72:2186-2192.
4. Boydston EE, Morelli TL, Holekamp KE. 2001. Sex differences in territorial behavior exhibited by the spotted hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta). Ethology. 107:369-385. (Pubitemid 32500919)
5. Brashares JS, Arcese P. 1999. Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces. Anim Behav. 57:11-17. (Pubitemid 29073088)
6. Buesching CD, Waterhouse JS, Macdonald DW. 2002. Gas-chromatographic analyses of the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles) part I: chemical differences related to individual parameters. J Chem Ecol. 28:41-56. (Pubitemid 34165684)
7. Burgener N, East ML, Hofer H, Dehnhard M. 2008. Do spotted hyena scent marks code for clan membership? In: Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Roberts SC, Wyatt TD, editors. Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. New York: Springer Science1Business Media, LLC. p. 169-177.
8. Cant MA, Otali E, Mwanguhya F. 2002. Fighting and mating between groups in a cooperatively breeding mammal, the banded mongoose. Ethology. 108:541-555. (Pubitemid 34629922)
9. Carlson AA, Young AJ, Russell AF, Bennett NC, McNeilly AS, Clutton- Brock TH. 2004. Hormonal correlates of dominance in meerkats (Suricata suricatta). Horm Behav. 46:141-150. (Pubitemid 38901033)
10. Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Russell AF, O'Riain MJ, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin A, Manser M, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM, et al. 2001. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. Science. 291:478-481. (Pubitemid 32097070)
11. Clutton-Brock TH, Hodge SJ, Flower TP. 2008. Group size and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in Kalahari meerkats. Anim Behav. 76:689-700.
12. Clutton-Brock TH, O'Riain MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M. 1999. Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science. 284:1640-1644. (Pubitemid 29291367)
13. Cooney R. 2002. Colony defense in Damaraland mole-rats, Cryptomys damarensis. Behav Ecol. 13:160-162. (Pubitemid 34290268)
14. Crawley MJ. 2007. The R book. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
15. Doolan SP, Macdonald DW. 1996. Dispersal and extra-territorial prospecting by slender-tailed meerkats (Suricata suricatta) in the southwestern Kalahari. J Zool. 240:59-73.
16. Dugdale HL, Macdonald DW, Pope LC, Burke T. 2007. Polygynandry, extra-group paternity and multiple-paternity litters in European badger (Meles meles) social groups. Mol Ecol. 16:5294-5306. (Pubitemid 350265258)
17. Emlen ST. 1991. Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs J, Davies NB, editors. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. p. 301-337.
18. Ferkin MH, Lee DN, Leonard ST. 2004. The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behavior and the responses of male conspecifics to such marks. Ethology. 110:257-272. (Pubitemid 38630538)
19. Fox J. 2009. car: Companion to Applied Regression. R package version 1.2-16 [cited 2011 March 07]. Available from: http://cran.r-project .org/web/packages/car/index.html.
20. Gosling LM. 1982. A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol. 60:89-118.
21. Gosling LM, Roberts SC. 2001. Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Study Behav. 30:169-217. (Pubitemid 33804553)
22. Griffin AS, Pemberton JM, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath G, Gaynor D, Kansky R, O'Riain J, Clutton-Brock TH. 2003. A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behav Ecol. 14:472-480. (Pubitemid 37042016)
23. Heinsohn R, Packer C, Pusey AE. 1996. Development of cooperative territoriality in juvenile lions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263: 475-479.
24. Hothorn T, Hornik K, van de Wiel M, Zeileis A. 2010. coin: Conditional Inference Procedures in a Permutation Test Framework. R package version 1.0-17 [cited 2011 March 07]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ coin/index.html.
25. Hurst JL. 1990. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim Behav. 40:209-222.
26. Hurst JL, Beynon RJ. 2004. Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. BioEssays. 26:1288-1298. (Pubitemid 39664622)
27. Johansson BG, Jones TM. 2007. The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev. 82:265-289. (Pubitemid 46587940)
28. Johnson RP. 1973. Scent marking in mammals. Anim Behav. 21: 521-535.
29. Jordan NR. 2007. Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in meerkats. Anim Behav. 74:531-540. (Pubitemid 47404508)
30. Jordan NR, Cherry MI, Manser MB. 2007. Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence. Anim Behav. 73:613-622. (Pubitemid 46497964)
31. Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock TH. 2008. The number of subordinates moderates intrasexual competition among males in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 275:209-216. (Pubitemid 350174592)
32. Lazaro-Perea C. 2001. Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Anim Behav. 62:11-21. (Pubitemid 32731608)
33. Manser MB. 2001. The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268:2315-2324. (Pubitemid 33096096)
34. Müller CA, Manser MB. 2007. "Nasty neighbours" rather than "dear enemies" in a social carnivore. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 274:959-965. (Pubitemid 47056746)
35. Müller CA, Manser MB. 2008. Scent-marking and intrasexual competition in a cooperative carnivore with low reproductive skew. Ethology. 114:174-185.
36. O'Riain MJ, Jarvis JUM. 1997. Colony member recognition and xenophobia in the naked mole-rat. Anim Behav. 53:487-498.
37. Palagi E, Dapporto L. 2007. Females do it better. Individual recognition experiments reveal sexual dimorphism in Lemur catta (Linnaeus 1758) olfactory motivation and territorial defence. J Exp Biol. 210:2700-2705. (Pubitemid 47310803)
38. Palphramand KL, White PCL. 2007. Badgers, Meles meles, discriminate between neighbour, alien and self scent. Anim Behav. 74:429-436. (Pubitemid 47404520)
39. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing [cited 2011 March 07]. Available from: http://www.Rproject. org.
40. Russell AF, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath GM, Sharpe LL, Clutton-Brock TH. 2003. Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state. Behav Ecol. 14:486-492. (Pubitemid 37042018)
41. Russell AF, Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Sharpe LL, Mcilrath GM, Dalerum FD, Cameron EZ, Barnard JA. 2002. Factors affecting pup growth and survival in co-operatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. J Anim Ecol. 71:700-709. (Pubitemid 34842163)
42. Scordato ES, Drea CM. 2007. Scents and sensibility: information content of olfactory signals in the ringtailed lemur, Lemur catta. Anim Behav. 73:301-314. (Pubitemid 46149573)
43. Spong GF, Hodge SJ, Young AJ, Clutton-Brock TH. 2008. Factors affecting the reproductive success of dominant male meerkats. Mol Ecol. 17:2287-2299. (Pubitemid 351562801)
44. Thiessen D, Rice M. 1976. Mammalian scent gland marking and social behavior. Psychol Bull. 83:505-539.
45. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW. 2001. Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav. 61:1203-1216. (Pubitemid 32608535)
46. Wyatt TD. 2003. Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Young AJ. 2003. Subordinate tactics in cooperative meerkats: helping, breeding and dispersal. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. [PhD thesis].
48. Young AJ, Carlson AA, Clutton-Brock TH. 2005. Trade-offs between extraterritorial prospecting and helping in a cooperative mammal. Anim Behav. 70:829-837. (Pubitemid 41416628)
49. Young AJ, Spong G, Clutton-Brock TH. 2007. Subordinate male meerkats prospect for extra-group paternity: alternative reproductive tactics in a cooperative mammal. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 274:1603-1609. (Pubitemid 47056656)
50. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
51. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Statistics for biology and health. New York: Springer Science1Business Media.