Improvement in hemodynamics with a new, larger-volume (50 cc) intra-aortic balloon for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 162-166

  Nair, Pradeep K ^a   Scolieri, Sun ^a   Lee, Ashley B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA BALLOON; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING; MALE; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 79955451552     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anwar A, Mooney MR, Stertzer SH, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation support for elective coronary angioplasty in the setting of poor left ventricular function: A two center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 1990;2:175-180.
2. Kahn JK, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR, et al. Supported "high risk" coronary an-gioplasty using intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:1151-1155. (Pubitemid 20104578)
3. Voudris V, Marco J, Morice MC, et al. "High-risk" percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with preventive intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1990;19:160-164. (Pubitemid 20150127)
4. Kreidieh I, Davies DW, Lim R, et al. High-risk coronary angioplasty with elective intra-aortic balloon pump support. Int J Cardiol 1992;35:147-152.
5. Mishra S, Chu W, Torguson R, et al. Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:608-612. (Pubitemid 44233455)
6. Briguori C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, et al. Elective versus pro-visional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percuta-neous transluminal coronary angioplasty Am Heart J 2003;145:700-707. (Pubitemid 36403501)
7. Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al; BCIS-1 Investigators. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:867-874.
8. Wu C, Hannan EL, Walford G, et al. A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:654-660. (Pubitemid 43170859)
9. Singh M, Rihal CS, Selzer F, et al. Validation of Mayo Clinic risk adjustment model for in-hospital complications after per-cutaneous coronary interventions, using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1722-1728. (Pubitemid 37433648)
10. Holper EM, Blair J, Selzer F, et al; Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry and Dynamic Registry Inves-tigators. The impact of ejection fraction on outcomes after per-cutaneous coronary intervention in patients with congestive heart failure: An analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angio-plasty Registry and Dynamic Registry Am Heart J 2006;151:69-75. (Pubitemid 41815333)
11. Keelan PC, Johnston JM, Koru-Sengul T, et al; Dynamic Reg-istry Investigators. Comparison of in-hospital and one-year outcomes in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions ≤ 40%, 41% to 49%, and ≥ 50% having percutaneous coro-nary revascularization. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1168-1172. (Pubitemid 36561378)
12. Wallace TW, Berger JS, Wang A, et al. Impact of left ventricular dysfunction on hos-pital mortality among patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interven-tion. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:355-360.
13. Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, et al. Initial experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 1968;203:113-118
14. Talpins NL, Kripke DC, Goetz RH. Counterpulsation and intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock: Circulatory dynamics. Arch Surg 1968;97:991-999.
15. Kantrowitz A, Krakauer J, Zorzi G, et al. Current status of intraaortic balloon pump and initial clinical experience with aortic patch mechanical auxiliary ventricle. Transplant Proc 1971:3:1459-1472.
16. Powell WJ Jr, Daggett WM, Margo AE, et al. Effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpul-sation on cardiac performance, oxygen consumption, and coronary blood flow in dogs. Circ Res 1970;26:753-764.
17. Shaw J, Taylor DR, Pitt B. Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on regional coro-nary blood flow in experimental myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:552-556.
18. Weber KT, Janicki JS. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation: A review of physiological principles, clinical results, and device safety Ann Thorac Surg 1974;17:602-636.
19. Buckley MJ, Leinbach RC, Kastor JA, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of intra-aortic bal-loon pumping in man. Circulation 1970;41:II130-II136.
20. Boiangiu C, Cohen M. Enhanced augmentation of cardiac output for different counterpul-sation modes using a new intra-aortic balloon and catheter. Cath Lab Digest 2010;18:1-4.
21. Williams DO, Korr KS, Gewirtz H, Most AS. The effect of intraaortic balloon counter-pulsation on regional myocardial blood flow and oxygen consumption in the presence of coronary artery stenosis in patients with unstable angina. Circulation 1982;66:593-597. (Pubitemid 12038583)
22. Fuchs RM, Brin KP, Brinker JA, et al. Augmentation of regional coronary blood flow by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with unstable angina. Circulation 1983;68:117-123. (Pubitemid 13058217)
23. Cohen M, Patel JJ, Dohad S, et al. Pilot prospective evaluation of counterpulsation with different intra-aortic balloon volumes on cardiac performance in humans. Cathet Car-diovasc Diagn 1995;36:82-87.
24. Papaioannou TG, Lekakis JP, Dagre AG, et al. Arterial compliance is an independent factor predicting acute hemodynamic performance of intra-aortic balloon counterpul-sation. Int J Artif Organs 2001;24:478-483. (Pubitemid 32904096)
25. Papaioannou TG, Terrovitis J, Kanakakis J, et al. Heart rate effect on hemodynamics during mechanical assistance by the intra-aortic balloon pump. Int J Artif Organs 2002;25:1160-1165. (Pubitemid 36104350)
26. Yoshitani H, Akasaka T, Kaji S, et al. Effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on coronary pressure in patients with stenotic coronary arteries. Am Heart J 2007;154:725-731. (Pubitemid 47429584)
27. Kolyva C, Pantalos GM, Giridharan GA, et al. Discerning aortic waves during intra-aortic balloon pumping and their relation to benefits of counterpulsation in humans. J Appl Physiol 2009;107:1497-1503.
28. Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Caracciolo EA, et al. Hemodynamic effects of new intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing methods in patients: A multicenter evaluation. Am Heart J 1999;137:1129-1136. (Pubitemid 30040739)
29. Cohen M, Ferguson JJ III, Freedman RJ Jr, et al. Comparison of outcomes after 8 vs. 9.5 French size intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation catheters based on 9,332 patients in the prospective Benchmark® Registry Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;56:200-206. (Pubitemid 34568818)