Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: A new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data
S.M. Schutz, and R.M. Abbott Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 535 539 (Pubitemid 30322335)
Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods
DOI 10.1067/mge.2002.129025
P.B. Cotton Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods Gastrointest Endosc 56 Suppl 2002 S283 S290 (Pubitemid 36236858)
Analyzing ERCP practice by a modified degree of difficulty scale: A multicenter database analysis
R. Madhotra, P.B. Cotton, and J. Vaughn Analyzing ERCP practice by a modified degree of difficulty scale: a multicenter database analysis Am J Gastroenterol 95 2000 2480 2481
Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: A simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty
DOI 10.1136/pmj.79.934.467
K. Raganath, L.A. Thomas, and W.Y. Cheung Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty Postgrad Med J 79 2003 467 470 (Pubitemid 37152227)
Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: Cardiopulmonary events
in press
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc (in press).
Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: Noncardiopulmonary events
in press
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: noncardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc (in press).