Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 820-827

  Klein, Andrew J ^a   Garcia, Joel A ^a   Hudson, Paul A ^a   Kim, Michael S ^a   Messenger, John C ^a   Casserly, Ivan P ^a   Wink, Onno ^a,b   Hattler, Brack ^c   Tsai, Thomas T ^c   Chen, S Y James ^a   Hansgen, Adam ^a   Carroll, John D ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Denver VA Medical Center ^*

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

coronary angiography; dual axis angiography; rotational coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUAL AXIS ROTATIONAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

BLOOD PRESSURE; COLORADO; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HOSPITALS, VETERANS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 79955414813     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22804     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: Comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91: 350-356. (Pubitemid 10220772)
2. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, Wilczek K, Barrios L, Raymenants E, Desmet W, De Geest H, Piessens J,. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 243-251. (Pubitemid 24063213)
3. Isner JM, Kishel J, Kent KM, Ronan JA Jr, Ross AM, Roberts WC,. Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic-histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients. Circulation 1981; 63: 1056-1064. (Pubitemid 11106372)
4. Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Chuang YC, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB,. Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: An intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1479-1485.
5. Mizuno K, Miyamoto A, Satomura K, Kurita A, Arai T, Sakurada M, Yanagida S, Nakamura H,. Angioscopic coronary macromorphology in patients with acute coronary disorders. Lancet 1991; 337: 809-812.
6. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, Booth DC, McClure R, Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria AN,. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991; 84: 1087-1099.
7. Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG,. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1975; 36: 174-178.
8. Akhtar M, Vakharia KT, Mishell J, Gera A, Ports TA, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD,. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 66: 43-49. (Pubitemid 41254603)
9. Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD,. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: An image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 753-761.
10. Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD,. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 62: 167-174. (Pubitemid 38788692)
11. Baim D, Grossman W,. Coronary angiography. In: Grossman's Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. pp 232-245.
12. Garcia JA, Movassaghi B, Casserly IP, Klein AJ, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Hansgen A, Wink O, Groves BM, Carroll JD,. Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 25: 455-462.
13. Kuon E, Niederst PN, Dahm JB,. Usefulness of rotational spin for coronary angiography in patients with advanced renal insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 369-373.
14. Raman SV, Morford R, Neff M, Attar TT, Kukielka G, Magorien RD, Bush CA,. Rotational X-ray coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 201-207. (Pubitemid 39313414)
15. Garcia JA, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Klein AJ, Carroll JD,. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 190-196. (Pubitemid 47208465)
16. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O'Neill WW,. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: Incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997; 103: 368-375. (Pubitemid 27506242)
17. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G,. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1393-1399. (Pubitemid 39303939)
18. Mehran R, Nikolsky E,. Contrast-induced nephropathy: Definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006 Apr (100): S11-S15.
19. Roriz R, de Gevigney G, Finet G, Nantois-Collet C, Borch KW, Amiel M, Beaune J,. Comparison of iodixanol (Visipaque) and ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: A double-blind randomized study. J Radiol 1999; 80: 727-732. (Pubitemid 29329919)
20. Chida K, Saito H, Otani H, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S, Yamada S, Shirato K, Zuguchi M,. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 774-778. (Pubitemid 46100261)
21. Horisaki T, Katoh O, Imai S, Inada T, Suzuki T, Iinuma K, Sugiura H, Bakker N, Melman N,. Feasibility evaluation of dual axis rotational angiography (XperSwing) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. MedicaMundi 2008; 52: 11-13.