Prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 425-432

  Lo, K Y ^a   Leung, K F ^a   Chu, C M ^a   Loke, K L ^a   Chan, C K ^a   Yue, C S ^a  

^a UNITED CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTERY RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HEART DEATH; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART STRESS; HUMAN; MAGNETISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERFUSION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STRESS;

EID: 79955402843     PISSN: 14602725     EISSN: 14602393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq238     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Scanion PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 1999; 99:2345-57.
2. Finn JP, Nael K, Deshpande V, Ratib O, Laub G. Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology. Radiology 2006; 241:338-54.
3. Wahl A, Paetsch I, Roethemeyer S, Klein C, Fleck E, Nagel E. High-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for follow-up after coronary revascularization procedures in patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest. Radiology 2004; 233:210-6.
4. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, Gebker R, Neuss M, Fleck E, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 2004; 110:835-42.
5. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Friedman J, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 1996; 93:905-14.
6. Elhendy A, Mahoney DW, Burger KN, McCully RB, Pellikka PA. Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in patients with classic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:559-63.
7. Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM, Hamilton CA, Rerkpattanapipat P, Link KM. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation 2002; 106:2328-33.
8. Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, Geller NL, Rhoads KL, Dyke CK, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1427-32.
9. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S, Manka R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007; 115:1769-76.
10. Steel K, Broderick R, Gandla V, Larose E, Resnic F, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation 2009; 120:1390-400.
11. Diamond GA. A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:574-5.
12. Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997; 102:350-6.
13. Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Sibershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97:1837-47.
14. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patient with chronic stable angina. Circulation 2003; 107:149-158.
15. Fraker TD, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. JACC 2007; 50:2264.
16. Pilz G, Bernhardt P, Klos M, Ali E, Wild M, Hofling B. Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography. Clin Res Cardiol 2006; 95:531-8.
17. Madsen JK, Bech J, Jorgensen E, Kastrup J, Kelbaek H, Saunamaki K. Yield of 5,536 diagnostic coronary arteriographies: results from a data registry. Cardiology 2002; 98:191-4.
18. Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW, Vach W, Moldrup M, Bartram P, et al. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:29-34.
19. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Marwick TH, Lauser MS, Heller GV, et al. The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:661-9.
20. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GBJ, Hayes SW, et al. COURAGE Trial Nuclear Substudy. Circulation 2008; 117:1283-91.
21. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, et al. 2006 ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computer Tomography and CMR. JACC 2006; 48:1475-97.