Action discovery for single and multi-agent reinforcement learning

Advances in Complex Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 279-305

  Banerjee, Bikramjit ^a   Kraemer, Landon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi agent reinforcement learning; multi agent systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955402817     PISSN: 02195259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219525911002937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Abbeel, P., Coates, A., Quigley, M. and Ng, A. Y., An application of reinforcement learning to aerobatic helicopter flight, NIPS 19 (2007).
2. Abdallah, S. and Lesser, V., Multiagent reinforcement learning and self-organization in a network of agents, in Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (2007).
3. Banerjee, B. and Kraemer, L., Reinforcement learning with action discovery, in Proceedings of the Adaptive and Learning Agents Workshop at AAMAS-10, Toronto, Canada, May-10th (2010), pp. 30-37.
4. Banerjee, B. and Peng, J., Generalized multiagent learning with performance bound, Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 15(3) (2007) 281-312.
5. Boutilier, C., Sequential optimality and coordination in multiagent systems, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1999), pp. 478-485.
6. Claus, C. and Boutilier, C., The dynamics of reinforcement learning in cooperative multiagent systems, in Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, (AAAI Press/MIT Press, 1998), pp. 746-752.
7. Crites, R. H. and Barto, A. G., Improving elevator performance using reinforcement learning, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, 8 (1996) 1017-1023.
8. Hu, J. and Wellman, M. P., Nash Q-learning for general-sum stochastic games, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4 (2003) 1039-1069.
9. Lazaric, A., Restelli, M. and Bonarini, A., Reinforcement learning in continuous action spaces through sequential monte carlo methods, Platt, J., Koller, D., Singer, Y. and Roweis, S., (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, Cambridge, MA, (MIT Press, 2008), pp. 833-840.
10. Littman, M. L., Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning, in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, San Mateo, CA (Morgan Kaufmann, 1994), pp. 157-163.
11. Ng, A. Y., Harada, D. and Russell, S., Policy invariance under reward transformations: Theory and application to reward shaping, in Proc. 16th International Conf. on Machine Learning (Morgan Kaufmann, 1999), pp. 278-287.
12. Perkins, T. J. and Barto, A. G., Lyapunov-constrained action sets for reinforcement learning, in Proceedings of the ICML (2001), pp. 409-416.
13. Sherstov, A. A. and Stone, P., Improving action selection in MDP's via knowledge transfer, in Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (July 2005).
14. Sutton, R. and Barto, A. G., Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press, 1998.
15. Sutton, R., Precup, D. and Singh, S., Between MDPs and semi-MDPs: A framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning, Artif. Intel. 112 (1999) 181-211. (Pubitemid 32079890)
16. Tesauro, G., Temporal difference learning and TD-gammon, Commun. ACM 38(3) (1995) 58-68.
17. Wiewiora, E., Potential based shaping and Q-value initialization are equivalent, J. Artif. Intel. Res. 19 (2003) 205-208. (Pubitemid 41525920)