Epistemic mediation: Aligning expertise across boundaries within an endangered species habitat conservation plan

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 523-547

  Goldstein, Bruce Evan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary object; Collaborative planning; Endangered species; Habitat conservation plan; Joint fact finding

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HABITAT CONSERVATION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79955398076     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2010.525374     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Altshuler, A. (1965) The City Planning Process (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
2. Becker, H. (1996) The epistemology of qualitative research, in: R. Jessor, A. Colby & R. Schweder (Eds) Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, pp. 53-71 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
3. Booher, D.E. & Innes, J.E. (2002) Network power in collaborative planning, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, pp. 221-236.
4. Booher, D.E. & Innes, J.E. (2010) Governance for resilience: CALFED as a complex adaptive network for resource management, Ecology and Society 15(3). Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art35.
5. Carlile, P.R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science, 13(4), pp. 442-455.
6. Clarke, A.E. (1990) Controversy and the development of the reproductive sciences, Social Problems, 37(1), pp. 18-38.
7. Corburn, J. (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(4), pp. 420-433.
8. Cussins, C.M. (1997) Elephants, biodiversity and complexity: Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Unpublished work, Department of Science and Technology Studies, Ithaca, Cornell University, NY.
9. Eden, S. (2009) The work of environmental governance networks: traceability, credibility and certification by the Forest Stewardship Council, Geoforum, 40(3), pp. 383-394.
10. Fischer, F. (1993) Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases, Policy Sciences, 26, pp. 165-187.
11. Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Durham and London, Duke University Press).
12. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Progress (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
13. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
14. Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
15. Gieryn, T.F. (1983) Boundary work and the demarcation of science from nonscience: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 781-795.
16. Goldman, M. (2009) Constructing connectivity: conservation corridors and conservation politics in East African rangelands, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(2), pp. 335-359.
17. Goldstein, B.E. (2004) War Between Social Worlds: Scientific Deadlock During Preparation of an Endangered Species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and the Co-Production of Scientific Knowledge and the Social Order (Berkeley, University of California).
18. Goldstein, B.E. (2008) Skunkworks in the embers of the Cedar Fire: enhancing resilience in the aftermath of disaster, Human Ecology, 36(1), pp. 15-28.
19. Goldstein, B.E. (2010) The weakness of strong ties: why scientists almost destroyed the Coachella Valley Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plan in order to save it, Environmental Management, 46(2), pp. 268-284.
20. Goldstein, B.E. & Butler, W.H. (2009) The network imaginary: coherence and creativity within a multiscalar collaborative effort to reform U.S. Fire Management, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(8), pp. 1013-1033.
21. Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 96(3), pp. 606-633.
22. Goodwin, C. & Heritage, J. (1990) Conversation analysis, Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, pp. 283-307.
23. Guston, D.H. (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction, Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), pp. 399-407.
24. Haas, P.M. (1989) Do regimes matter?-epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control, International Organization, 43(3), pp. 377-403.
25. Haraway, D. (1992) The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriated others, in: L. Grossberg, C. Nelson & P.A. Treichler (Eds) Cultural Studies, pp. 295-337 (New York, Routledge).
26. Haraway, D.J. (1996) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of a Partial Perspective, pp. 183-202 (London, Routledge).
27. Haraway, D.J. (1997) Modest_witness@second_millennium. femaleman©_meets_oncomouse™ (New York, Routledge).
28. Harding, S. (1996) Science is "good to think with", Social Text, 46/47, pp. 15-17.
29. Harvey, F. & Chrisman, N. (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1683-1694.
30. Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory, Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143-162.
31. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (London, MacMillan).
32. Hilgartner, S. (2000) Science on Stage: Expect Advice as Public Drama (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
33. Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
34. Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (2010) Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (New York, Routledge).
35. Innes, J.E. & Gruber, J. (2005) Planning styles in conflict, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), pp. 177-188.
36. Jasanoff, S. (1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
37. Jasanoff, S. (2004) Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (London, Routledge).
38. Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), pp. 39-103.
39. Karl, H.A. & Susskind, L.E. (2007) A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding, Environment: Science and Policy For Sustainable Development, 49(1), pp. 20-34.
40. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
41. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
42. Latour, B.W.S. (1979) Laboratory life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills, Sage).
43. Luoma, J.R. (1998) Habitat conservation plans: compromise or capitulation?, Audubon, 100(1), pp. 36-44.
44. Ozawa, C.P. (1991) Recasting Science: Consensus Procedures in Public Policy Making (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).
45. Rittel, H. & Webber, M.M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 155-169.
46. Sandercock, L. (2003) Cosmopolis 2: Mongrel Cities (New York, Continuum).
47. Shackley, S. & Wynne, B. (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary ordering devices and authority, Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(3), pp. 275-302.
48. Shapin, S. (1992) Why the public ought to understand science in the making, Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), pp. 27-30.
49. Star, S.L. (1994) Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: Feminism, method and information technology. Gender-Nature-Culture Feminist Research Network Working Paper, 11, Odense University, Odense.
50. Star, S.L. (2002) Got infrastructure? How standards, categories and other aspects of infrastructure influence communication. Paper presented at the 2nd Social Study of IT Workshop at the London School of Economics. Available at URL: http://is2.lse.ac.uk/events/ssit2/LeighStar.pdf: (accessed 12 December 2008).
51. Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J. (1989) Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects, Social Studies of Science, 19, pp. 387-420.
52. Strauss, A. (1991) Creating Sociological Awareness: Collective Images and Symbolic Representations (New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Press).
53. Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M. & Eijsackers, H. (2007) Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy, Ecological Indicators, 7(2), pp. 215-228.
54. Weeks, P. & Packard, J.M. (1997) Acceptance of scientific management by natural resource dependent communities, Conservation Biology, 11(1), pp. 236-245.