A small scale experimental study: Using animations to learn vocabulary

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 24-30

  Kayaoǧlu, M Naci ^a   Daǧ Akbaş, Raşide ^a   Öztürk, Zeynep ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Animation; CALL; Multimedia; Vocabulary learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955157782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3): 241-249.
2. BAŞ, G. & Kuzucu, O. (2009). Effects of CALL method and dyned language programme on students' achievement levels and attitudes towards the lesson in English classes. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 6(7), Retrieved February 3, 2010, from http://itdl.org/Journal/Jul_09/article03.htm
3. Boswood, T. (1997). New Ways of Using Computers in Language Teaching. New Ways in TESOL Series II Innovative Classroom Techniques. USA: TESOL, Inc.
4. Butler-Pascoe, M. E. & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and Teaching English Language Learners. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
5. Davies, G. (2002). CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning). Retrieved February 2, 2010, from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/61#
6. Devi, V. A. (2005). Using animation for teaching phrasal verbs: A brief Indian experiment. Language In India, 5, 8. Retrieved February 5, 2010, from http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2005/animationanitha1.html
7. Ghabanchi, Z. & Anbarestani, M. (2008). The Effects Of Call Program On Expanding Lexical Knowledge Of EFL Iranian Intermediate Learners. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 86-95.
8. Hai-peng, H. & Li-jing, D. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition in multimedia environment. US-China Foreign Language, 5(8), 55-59.
9. Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. China: Longman.
10. Kavčič, A. (2006). Language Learning with First Click on Slovene. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, 95-99.
11. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Lin, C. (2009). Learning action verbs with animation. The JALT CALL Journal. 5(3), 23-40.
13. Ma, Q. & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.
14. O'Connor, P. & Gatton, W. (2004). Implementing Multimedia in a University EFL Program: A Case Study in CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (199-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Paivio, A. (2006). Dual Coding Theory and Education. The Conference on Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children. 1-20.
16. Price, K. (1987). The use of technology: varying the medium in language teaching. In Rivers, W. N. (Ed.), Interactive Language Teaching (155-169). New York: Cambridge Language Teaching Library.
17. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (15-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.