Opinions of university graduates about social networks according to their personal characteristics

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 184-189

  Işbulan, Onur ^a  

^a SAKARYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Facebook; Internet use; Personality; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955155702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alexa. (2010). Retrieved December 23, 2010, from Alexa:www.alexa.com
2. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology & Standards Watch.
3. Balkan Ki{dotless}yi{dotless}ci{dotless}, F. (2010). The Definitions and Preferences of Science Teacher Candidates Concerning Web 2.0 Tools: A Phenomenological Research Study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 185-195.
4. Becker, T. E. (2004). Building networks in organizations: a closer look at motivation and behavior. In: Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting. New Orleans.
5. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 210-230.
6. Burt, R. S., Janotta, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 63-87.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
8. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1143-1168.
9. Facebook. (2010, December 12). Facebook. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from www.facebook.com: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics#!/press/info.php?factsheet
10. Facebook. (2010, December 12). Facebook. Retrieved December 12, 2010, from www.facebook.com: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?timeline#!/press/info.php?statistics
11. Francis, J., Brown, L., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443-449.
12. Karanci{dotless}, N., Dirik, G., & Yorulmaz, O. (2007). Eysenck Kişilik Anketi-Gözden Geçirilmiş Ki{dotless}salti{dotless}lmi{dotless}ş Formu'nun (EKA-GGK) Türkiye'de Geçerlik ve Güvenilirlik Çali{dotless}şmasi{dotless}. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(3), 1-8.
13. Karasar, N. (1995). Bilimsel Araşti{dotless}rma Yöntemi-Kavramlar, İlkeler, Teknikler. Ankara: 3A Araşti{dotless}rma, Eǧitim, Dani{dotless}şmanli{dotless}k Ltd.
14. Ozad, B. E., & Kutoglu, U. (2010). The Use of the Internet in Media Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 245-255.
15. Ross, C., Orr, E., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 578-586.
16. Sahin, Y. G., Balta, S., & Ercan, T. (2010). The Use of Internet Resources by University Students During their Course Projects Elicitation: A Case Study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 234-244.
17. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is Good for Learning and for Research: Principles and Prototypes. WWW 2008 (pp. 705-714). Beijing: International World Wide Web Conference Committee.
18. Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?: Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 436-455.