Impact of visual motion adaptation on neural responses to objects and its dependence on the temporal characteristics of optic flow

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1825-1834

  Liang, Pei ^a   Kern, Roland ^a   Kurtz, Rafael ^a   Egelhaaf, Martin ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fly; Object detection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CALLIPHORIDAE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GAZE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; OPTIC FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA HORIZONTAL NERVE CELL; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DIPTERA; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; MODELS, ANIMAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTIC FLOW; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955152482     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00359.2010     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev 61: 183-193, 1954.
2. Barlow HB. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Sensory Communication, edited by Rosenblith WA. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1961, p. 217-234.
3. Benda J, Longtin A, Maler L. Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations. J Neurosci 25: 2312-2321,2005.
4. Boeddeker N, Lindemann JP, Egelhaaf M, Zeil J. Responses of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons to reconstructed optic flow along outdoor flight paths. J Comp Physiol A 191: 1143-1155, 2005.
5. Borst A, Egelhaaf M. Temporal modulation of luminance adapts time constant of fly movement detectors. Biol Cybern 56: 109-215, 1987.
6. Borst A, Haag J. Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly. J Comp Physiol A 188: 419-437, 2002.
7. Borst A, Reisenman C, Haag J. Adaptation of response transients in fly motion vision. II: Model studies. Vision Res 43: 1311-1324, 2003.
8. Braun E, Geurten B, Egelhaaf M. Identifying prototypical components in behaviour using clustering algorithms. PLos One 5: e9361, 2010.
9. Brenner N, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26: 695-702, 2000.
10. Carandini M, Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 276: 949-952, 1997.
11. Clifford CW, Ibbotson MR. Fundamental mechanisms of visual motion detection: models, cells and functions. Prog Neurobiol 68: 409-37, 2002.
12. de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Zaagman WH, Mastebroek HAK. Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly, Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol Cybern 54: 223-236, 1986.
13. Dragoi V, Sharma J, Miller EK, Sur M. Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination. Nat Neurosci 5: 883-891, 2002.
14. Dürr V, Egelhaaf M. In vivo calcium accumulation in presynaptic and postsynaptic dendrites of visual interneurons. J Neurophysiol 82: 3327-3338,1999.
15. Egelhaaf M. The neural computation of visual information. In: Invertebrate Vision, edited by Warrant E, Nielsson DE. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University, 2006 p. 399-461.
16. Egelhaaf M. Insect motion vision. Scholarpedia 4: 1671, 2009.
17. Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W. Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. J Opt Soc Am A 6: 1070-1087, 1989.
18. Egelhaaf M, Kern R, Krapp HG, Kretzberg J, Kurtz R, Warzecha AK. Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant visual-motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci 25: 96-102, 2002.
19. Fain GL, Matthews HR, Cornwall MC, Koutalos Y. Adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors. Physiol Rev 81: 117-151, 2001.
20. Fairhall AL, Lewen GD, Bialek W, de Ruyter Van Steveninck RR. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412: 787-792, 2001.
21. Farrow K, Haag J, Borst A. Nonlinear, binocular interactions underlying flow field selectivity of a motion-sensitive neuron. Nat Neurosci 9: 1312-1320,2006.
22. Frye MA, Dickinson MH. Fly flight: a model for the neural control of complex behavior. Neuron 32: 385-388, 2001.
23. Gill P, Woolley SM, Fremouw T, Theunissen FE. What's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes. J Neurophysiol 99: 2809-2820, 2008.
24. Harris RA, O'Carroll DC, Laughlin SB. Adaptation and the temporal delay filter of fly motion detectors. Vision Research 39: 2603-2613, 1999.
25. Hausen K. Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. I. The horizontal cells: structure and signals. Biol Cybern 45: 143-156, 1982a.
26. Hausen K. Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46: 67-79, 1982b.
27. Hietanen MA, Crowder NA, Price NS, Ibbotson MR. Influence of adapting speed on speed and contrast coding in the primary visual cortex of the cat. J Physiol 584: 451-462, 2007.
28. Karmeier K, van Hateren JH, Kern R, Egelhaaf M. Encoding of naturalistic optic flow by a population of blowfly motion-sensitive neurons. J Neurophysiol 96: 1602-1614, 2006.
29. Kawano K, Miles FA. Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. J Neurophysiol 56: 1355-1380, 1986.
30. Kern R, van Hateren JH, Michaelis C, Lindemann JP, Egelhaaf M. Function of a fly motion-sensitive neuron matches eye movements during free flight. PLoS Biol 3: e171, 2005.
31. Kern R, van Hateren JH, Egelhaaf M. Representation of behaviourally relevant information by blowfly motion-sensitive visual interneurons requires precise compensatory head movements. J Exp Biol 209: 1251-1260, 2006.
32. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J Neurophysiol 97: 3155-3164, 2007.
33. Krapp HG, Hengstenberg R, Egelhaaf M. Binocular contribution to optic flow processing in the fly visual system. J Neurophysiol 85: 724-734, 2001.
34. Kurtz R. Direction-selective adaptation in fly visual motion-sensitive neurons is generated by an intrinsic conductance-based mechanism. Neuroscience 146: 573-583, 2007.
35. Kurtz R. The many facets of adaptation in fly visual motion adaptation. Comm Integr Biol 2: 17-19, 2009.
36. Kurtz R, Beckers U, Hundsdörfer B, Egelhaaf M. Mechanisms of afterhyperpolarization following activation of fly visual motion-sensitive neurons. Eur J Neurosci 30: 567-577, 2009a.
37. Kurtz R, Dürr V, Egelhaaf M. Dendritic calcium accumulation associated with direction selective adaptation in visual motion sensitive neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 84: 1914-1923, 2000.
38. Kurtz R, Egelhaaf M. Natural patterns of neural activity: How physiological mechanisms are orchestrated to cope with real life. Mol Neurobiol 27: 1-19, 2003.
39. Kurtz R, Egelhaaf M, Meyer HG, Kern R. Adaptation accentuates responses of fly motion-sensitive visual neurons to sudden stimulus changes. Proc R Soc B 276: 3711-3719, 2009b.
40. Laughlin SB. Matching coding, circuits, cells, and molecules to signals: general principles of retinal design in the fly's eye. Prog Retin Eye Res 13: 165-196, 1994.
41. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 69: 1918-1929, 1993.
42. Liang P, Kern R, Egelhaaf M. Motion adaptation enhances object-induced neural activity in three-dimensional virtual environment. J Neurosci 28: 11328-11332, 2008.
43. Lindemann JP, Kern R, Michaelis C, Meyer P, van Hateren JH, Egelhaaf M. FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and high-speed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow. Vision Res 43: 779-791, 2003.
44. Maddess T, Laughlin SB. Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 225: 251-275, 1985.
45. Nordström K, Barnett PD, Moyer de Miguel IM, Brinkworth RSA, O'Carroll DC. Sexual dimorphism in the hoverfly motion vision pathway. Curr Biol 18: 661-667, 2008.
46. Reches A, Gutfreund Y. Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl. J Neurosci 28: 1523-1533, 2008.
47. Reisenman C, Haag J, Borst A. Adaptation of response transients in fly motion vision. I: Experiments. Vision Res 43: 1291-1307, 2003.
48. Rieke F, Rudd ME. The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. Neuron 64: 605-616, 2009.
49. Ronacher B, Hennig RM. Neuronal adaptation improves the recognition of temporal patterns in a grasshopper. J Comp Physiol A 190: 311-319, 2004.
50. Safran MN, Flanagin VL, Borst A, Sompolinsky H. Adaptation and information transmission in fly motion detection. J Neurophysiol 98: 3309-3320, 2007.
51. Schilstra C, van Hateren JH. Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics. J Exp Biol 202: 1481-1490, 1999.
52. Single S, Borst A. Dendritic integration and its role in computing image velocity. Science 281: 1848-1850, 1998.
53. Smirnakis SM, Berry MJ, Warland DK, Bialek W, Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 386: 69-73, 1997.
54. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW. Visual navigation in flying insects. Int Rev Neurobiol 44: 67-92, 2000.
55. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 216: 427-459, 1982.
56. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Horridge GA. Visual figure-ground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries. Proc R Soc Lond B 238: 331-350, 1990.
57. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 391-398, 2003.
58. van Hateren JH. Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly. Vision Res 37: 3407-3416, 1997.
59. van Hateren JH, Kern R, Schwerdtfeger G, Egelhaaf M. Function and coding in the blowfly H1 neuron during naturalistic optic flow. J Neurosci 25: 4343-4352, 2005.
60. van Hateren JH, Schilstra C. Blowfly flight and optic flow. II. Head movements during flight. J Exp Biol 202: 1491-1500, 1999.
61. Wark B, Fairhall A, Rieke F. Timescales of inference in visual adaptation. Neuron 61: 750-761, 2009.