Towards quality discourse in online news comments

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 133-142

  Diakopoulos, Nicholas ^a   Naaman, Mor ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commenting systems; Online discourse; Online journalism

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

NEWS ARTICLES; NEWS INFORMATION; ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; ONLINE DISCOURSE; ONLINE JOURNALISMS; ONLINE NEWS;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 79955145366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1958824.1958844     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bergström, A. The Reluctant Audience: Online Participation in the Swedish Journalistic Context. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 5 (2). 60-80.
2. Burke, M. and Kraut, R., Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Impact of Politeness and Rudeness in Online Communities. in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (2008).
3. Chung, D.S. Profits and Perils: Online News Producers' Perceptions of Interactivity and Uses of Interactive Features. Convergence, 13 (43).
4. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J., How Oversight Improves Member-Maintained Communities. in Proceedings of CHI, (2005), 11-20. (Pubitemid 41809040)
5. Diakopoulos, N., Naaman, M. and Kivran-Swaine, F., Diamonds in the Rough: Social Media Visual Analytics for Journalistic Inquiry. in IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), (2010).
6. Díaz Noci, J., Domingo, D., Masip, P., Lluís Micó, J. and Ruiz, C., Comments in News, Democracy Booster or Journalistic Nightmare: Assessing the Quality and Dynamics of Citizen Debates in Catalan Online Newspapers. in International Symposium on Online Journalism, (2010).
7. Domingo, D. Interactivity in The Daily Routines of Online Newsrooms: Dealing with An Uncomfortable Myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. 680-704.
8. Fortuna, B., Rodrigues, E.M. and Milic-Frayling, N., Improving the Classification of Newsgroup Messages through Social Network Analysis. in Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (2007).
9. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K., Understanding Deja Reviewers. in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (2010).
10. Gindl, S. and Liegl, J., Evaluation of Different Sentiment Detection Methods for Polarity Classification on Web-Based Reviews. in Computational Aspects of Affectual and Emotional Interaction, (2008).
11. Gurzick, D., White, K., Lutters, W. and Boot, L., A View from Mount Olympus: The Impact of Activity Tracking Tools on the Character and Practice of Moderation. in GROUP, (2009).
12. Hecht, B. and Gergle, D., On the "Localness" of User- Generated Content. in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (2010).
13. Hermida, A. and Thurman, N. A Clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2 (3). 343-356.
14. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. Socal Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10). 1123-1134.
15. Kilner, P. and Hoadley, C. Anonymity Options and Professional Participation in an Online Community of Practice Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 2005.
16. Kovach, B. and Rosenstiel, T. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Three Rivers Press, 2007.
17. Lampe, C., Johnston, E. and Resnick, P., Follow the Reader: Filtering Comments on Slashdot. in Proceedings of CHI, (2007), 1253-1262. (Pubitemid 47591575)
18. Lampe, C. and Resnick, P., Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. in Proceedings of CHI, (2004), 543-550.
19. Manosevitch, E. and Walker, D. Reader Comments to Online Opinion Journalism: A Space of Public Deliberation. Online Journalism Symposium, 2009.
20. Miller, K. Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts. McGraw-Hill, 2004.
21. Nagar, N.a. The Loud Public: Users' Comments and the Online News Media. Online Journalism Symposium, 2009.
22. Nam, K. and Ackerman, M.S., Arkose: Reusing Informal Information from Online Discussions. in GROUP, (2007).
23. Otterbacher, J., "Helpfulness" in Online Communities: A Measure of Message Quality. in Proceedings of CHI, (2009).
24. Pang, B. and Lee, L. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, 2008.
25. Paulussen, S. and Ugille, P. User Generated Content in the Newsroom: Professional and Organisational Constraints on Participatory Journalism. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 5 (2). 24-41.
26. Perry, D.K. Theory and Research in Mass Communication: Contexts and Consequences (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
27. Powazek, D. Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Real People in Virtual Places. Waite Group Press, 2001.
28. Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T. and Olmstead, K. Understanding the participatory news consumer Pew Internet, 2010.
29. Solove, D.J. The Future of Reputation: gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. Yale University Press, 2007.
30. Strong, D., Lee, Y. and Wang, R. Data Quality in Context. Communications of the ACM, 40 (5). 103-110.
31. Taylor, R. Value-Added Processes in Information Systems. Ablex, 1986.
32. Wanas, N., El-Saban, M., Ashour, H. and Ammar, W., Automatic Scoring of Online Discussion Posts. in Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web (WICOW), (2008).
33. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W. and Cherny, L., The Dynamics of Mass Interaction. in Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), (1998).
34. Wise, K., Hamman, B. and Thorson, K. Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (1).