Extension from inpatients to outpatients: Validity and reliability of the Oxford Knee Score in measuring health outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis

International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 206-210

  Xie, Feng ^a   Ye, Hua ^b   Zhang, Yu ^c   Liu, Xia ^b   Lei, Ting ^b   Li, Shu Chuen ^d  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Osteoarthritis; Outpatient; Quality of life; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PAIN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CHINA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTPATIENTS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 79955131669     PISSN: 17561841     EISSN: 1756185X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01580.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. O'Reilly S, Doherty M (2003) Signs, symptoms, and laboratory tests. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS (eds) Osteoarthritis, pp 197-210. Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15, 1833-40.
3. Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P (1987) Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation - value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scand J Rheumatol 65 (Suppl), 85-9.
4. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8, 439-48.
5. Charoencholvanich K, Pongcharoen B (2005) Oxford knee score and SF-36: translation & reliability for use with total knee arthroscopy patients in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 88, 1194-202.
6. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80, 63-9.
7. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2000) Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71, 268-74.
8. Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN (2005) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 76, 347-52.
9. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Sieverding M, et al. (2009) The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 17, 49-52.
10. Padua R, Zanoli G, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Bondi R, Campi A (2003) The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item Knee Questionnaire-cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Int Orthop 27, 214-6.
11. Xie F, Li SC, Lo NN, et al. (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese Versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15, 1019-24.
12. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE (2000) How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln.
13. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21, 271-92.
14. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J (2004) A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 13, 873-84.
15. Wee HL, Cheung YB, Fong KY, Luo N, Machin D, Thumboo J (2004) Are English- and Chinese-language versions of the SF-6D equivalent? A comparison from a population-based study Clin Ther 26, 1137-48.
16. Rabin R, de charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33, 337-43.
17. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. (2003) Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 32, 685-90.
18. Fayers PM, Machin D (2000) Quality of life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
19. Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicki D (1998) Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. In: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM (eds) Quality of Life Assessssment in Clinical Trials Methods and Practice, pp 169-82. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Sharma S (1996) Applied Multivariate Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
21. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ (1990) Defining arthritis and measuring functional status in elders: methodological issues in the study of disease and physical disability. Am J Public Health 80, 945-9.
22. Norman-Taylor FH, Palmer CR, Villar RN (1996) Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78, 74-7.
23. Juniper EF, Gordon HG, Roman J (1996) How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, pp 49-56. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.