The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire - Cross-cultural adaptation and validation

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 214-216

  Padua, R ^a,f   Zanoli, G ^b   Ceccarelli, E ^c   Romanini, E ^d   Bondi R ^e   Campi, A ^a  

^a San Giacomo Hospital   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^c BAMBINO GESÙ CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d ISPEO   (Italy)

^e CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^f NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; OXFORD KNEE QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0042322946     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0453-x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amadio PC (1993) Outcomes measurements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75:1583-1584.
2. Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian health survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025-1036
3. Dawson J, Carr A (2001) Outcomes evaluation in orthopedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:313-315
4. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80:63-69
5. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2000) Translation and validation of the Oxford 12-item Knee Score for use in Sweden. Acta Ortop Scand 71:268-274
6. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3,600 patients from the Sweden knee arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:339-344
7. Freedman KB, Back S, Bernstein J (2001) Sample size and statistical power of randomized, controlled trials in orthopedics. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:397-402
8. Garellick G, Herberts P, Malchau H (1999) The value of clinical data scoring systems: are traditional hip scoring systems adequate to use in evaluation after total hip surgery? J Arthroplasty 14:1024-1029
9. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417-1432
10. Harcourt WG, White SH, Jones P (2001) Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire. The effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:345-347
11. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14
12. Padua R, Romanini E, Zanoli G (1998) Analisi dei risultati nelle affezioni dell'apparato muscolo-scheletrico. Guerini Ed, Milan
13. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Bondi R, Zanoli G, Campi A (2001) Cross-cultural adaptation of Lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease. Spine 26:E344-347
14. Pynsent PB (2001) Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:792-794.
15. Ware JE, Sherbourne C (1992) The MOS 36-items short-form survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and items selection. Med Care 30:473-483
16. Zanoli G, Stronqvist B, Padua R, Romanini E (2000) Lesson learned searching for HRQoL instruments to assess the results of treatment in person with lumbar disorder. Spine 25:3178-185