Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 987-996

  Satel, J ^a   Wang, Z ^b   Trappenberg, T P ^a   Klein, R M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic neural field model; Eye movements; Habituation; Inhibition of return; Orienting; Short term plasticity; Superior colliculus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC NEURAL FIELD MODEL; HABITUATION; INHIBITION OF RETURN; NERVE CELL CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSORY STIMULATION; SHORT TERM DEPRESSION; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ATTENTION; CUES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION; SUPERIOR COLLICULI;

EID: 79955128011     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abrams R.A., Dobkin R.S. Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:467-477.
2. Abrams R.A., Dobkin R.S. The gap effect and inhibition of return: Interactive effects on eye movement latencies. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 98:483-487.
3. Amari S. Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics 1977, 27(2):77-87. 10.1007/BF00337259.
4. Arai K., Keller E.L. A model of the saccade-generating system that accounts for trajectory variations produced by competing visual stimuli. Biological Cybernetics 2005, 92(1):21-37.
5. Arai K., Keller E.L., Edelman J.A. Two-dimensional neural network model of the primate saccadic system. Neural Networks 1994, 7(6-7):1115-1135. 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80162-5.
6. Arai K., McPeek R.M., Keller E.L. Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91:890-900.
7. Bell A.H., Corneil B.D., Munoz D., Meredith M.A. Engagement of visual fixation suppresses sensory responsiveness and multisensory integration in the primate superior colliculus. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 18(10):2867-2873.
8. Bell A., Fecteau J., Munoz D. Using auditory and visual stimuli to investigate the behavioral and neuronal consequences of reflexive covert orienting. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 91(5):2172-2184. 10.1152/jn.01080.2003.
9. Bell A., Munoz D. Activity in the superior colliculus reflects dynamic interactions between voluntary and involuntary influences on orienting behaviour. European Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(8):1654-1660. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06393.
10. Briand K.A., Larrison A.L., Sereno A.B. Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62(8):1512-1524.
11. Chou I., Sommer M., Schiller P. Express averaging saccades in monkeys. Vision Research 1999, 39(25):4200-4216.
12. Clower D.M., West R.A., Lynch J.C., Strick P.L. The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21(16):6283-6291.
13. Das S., Keller E.L., Arai K. A distributed model of the saccadic system: The effects of internal noise. Neurocomputing 1996, 11(2-4):245-269. 10.1016/0925-2312(95)00068-2.
14. Dorris M.C., Klein R.M., Everling S., Munoz D. Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(8):1256-1263. 10.1162/089892902760807249.
15. Dorris M.C., Munoz D. Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(17):7015-7026.
16. Dorris M.C., Taylor T., Klein R.M., Munoz D. Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1999, 81:2429-2436.
17. Dukewich K.R. Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(2):238-251. 10.3758/PBR.16.2.238.
18. Dukewich K.R., Boehnke S.E. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 448:231-235.
19. Fecteau J., Bell A., Munoz D. Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92(3):1728-1737. 10.1152/jn.00184.2004.
20. Fecteau J., Munoz D. Correlates of capture of attention and inhibition of return across stages of visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(11):1714-1727. 10.1162/089892905774589235.
21. Fecteau J., Munoz D. Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(8):382-390. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.011.
22. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. Oculomotor capture and inhibition of return: Evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR. Psychological Research 2002, 66(4):234-246. 10.1007/s00426-002-0098-1.
23. Hopfinger J., Mangun G. Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science 1998, 9(6):441-447.
24. Hopfinger J.B., Mangun G.R. Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2001, 1(1):56-65.
25. Huber D.E. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137(2):324-347. 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324.
26. Ignashchenkova A., Dicke P.W., Haarmeier T., Thier P. Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7(1):56-64. 10.1038/nn1169.
27. Ivanoff J., Klein R.M. The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8(2):307-314.
28. Ivanoff J., Klein R.M. Inhibition of return: Sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(4):908-919.
29. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(4):138-147. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2.
30. Klein R.M. On the control of orienting. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 29-44. Guilford Press, New York. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
31. Klein R.M. Orienting and inhibition of return. The cognitive neurosciences 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 3rd ed. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
32. Klein R.M., Taylor T.L. Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory & language 1994, 113-150. Academic Press, New York. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.).
33. Kopecz K. Saccadic reaction times in gap/overlap paradigms: A model based on integration of intentional and visual information on neural, dynamic fields. Vision Research 1995, 35(20):2911-2925. 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00066-9.
34. Kopecz K., Schöner G. Saccadic motor planning by integrating visual information and pre-information on neural dynamic fields. Biological Cybernetics 1995, 73(1):49-60. 10.1007/BF00199055.
35. Lui F., Gregory K.M., Blanks R.H.I., Giolli R.A. Projections from visual areas of the cerebral cortex to pretectal nuclear complex, terminal accessory optic nuclei, and superior colliculus in macaque monkey. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 1995, 363(3):439-460. 10.1002/cne.903630308.
36. Maylor E.A., Hockey R. Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:777-787.
37. Meeter M., Van der Stigchel S., Theeuwes J. A competitive integration model of exogenous and endogenous eye movements. Biological Cybernetics 2010, 102(4):271-291. 10.1007/s00422-010-0365-y.
38. Munoz D., Fecteau J. Vying for dominance: Dynamic interactions control visual fixation and saccadic initiation in the superior colliculus. The Brain's eye: Neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research 2002, Vol. 140:3-19. Elsevier.
39. Munoz D., Wurtz R.H. Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of burst and buildup cells. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73(6):2313-2333.
40. Ottes F.P., Van Gisbergen J.A., Eggermont J.J. Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes. Vision Research 1984, 24(10):1169-1179.
41. Patel S.S., Peng X., Sereno A.B. Shape effects on reflexive spatial selective attention and a plausible neurophysiological model. Vision Research 2010, 50(13):1235-1248. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.010.
42. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance 1984, Vol. 10:531-556. London, Hillsdale, NJ.
43. Posner M.I., Klein R.M., Summers J., Buggie S. On the selection of signals. Memory and Cognition 1973, 1:2-12.
44. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985, 2(3):211-228. 10.1080/02643298508252866.
45. Prime D., Ward L. Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science 2004, 15(4):272-276.
46. Prime D.J., Ward L.M. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain Research 2006, 1072:161-174.
47. Rafal R.D., Calabresi P.A., Brennan C.W., Sciolto T.K. Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15(4):673-685.
48. Rafal R.D., Egly R., Rhodes R. Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 48:284-300.
49. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Jha A.P., Rosenquist J.N. What is inhibited in inhibition of return?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22(2):367-378.
50. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27(1):611-647. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039.
51. Robinson D. Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. Vision Research 1972, 12(11):1795-1808. 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90070-3.
52. Robinson D.L., Kertzman C. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. III. Contributions of the superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 74(2):713-721.
53. Rodieck R.W., Watanabe M. Survey of the morphology of macaque retinal ganglion cells that project to the pretectum, superior colliculus, and parvicellular laminae of the lateral geniculate nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 1993, 338(2):289-303. 10.1002/cne.903380211.
54. Sapir A., Soroker N., Berger A., Henik A. Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2(12):1053-1054. 10.1038/15977.
55. Sereno A.B., Briand K.A., Amador S.C., Szapiel S.V. Disruption of reflexive attention and eye movements in an individual with a collicular lesion. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 2006, 28(1):145-166. 10.1080/13803390590929298.
56. Simion F., Valenza E., Umiltà C., Barba B.D. Inhibition of return in newborns is temporo-nasal asymmetrical. Infant Behavior and Development 1994, 18(2):189-194. 10.1016/0163-6383(95)90048-9.
57. Sparks D., Hartwich-Young R. The deep layers of the superior colliculus. Reviews of oculomotor research 1989, Vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
58. Sumner P., Nachev P., Vora N., Husain M., Kennard C. Distinct cortical and collicular mechanisms of inhibition of return revealed with S cone stimuli. Current Biology 2004, 14(24):2259-2263. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.021.
59. Tassinari G., Aglioti S., Chelazzi L., Marzi C.A., Berlucchi G. Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25(1A):55-71.
60. Taylor, T. (1997). Generating and measuring inhibition of return, PhD thesis. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
61. Taylor T., Klein R. On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5(4):625-643.
62. Taylor T.L., Klein R.M. Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(5):1639-1656.
63. Theeuwes J., Kramer A.F., Hahn S., Irwin D.E. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science 1998, 9:379-385.
64. Tipper S.P., Driver J., Weaver B. Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 1991, 43(2):289. 10.1080/14640749108400971.
65. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Watson F.L. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22(5):1289-1293.
66. Trappenberg T., Dorris M., Munoz D., Klein R. A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(2):256-271.
67. Valenza E., Simion F., Umiltà C. Inhibition of return in newborn infants. Infant Behavior and Development 1995, 17(3):293-302. 10.1016/0163-6383(94)90009-4.
68. Watanabe K. Inhibition of return in averaging saccades. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 138(3):330-342.
69. Wilimzig C., Schneider S., Schoener G. The time course of saccadic decision making: Dynamic field theory. Neural Networks 2006, 19(8):1059-1074. 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003.
70. Wilson H.R., Cowan J.D. A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Biological Cybernetics 1973, 13(2):55-80. 10.1007/BF00288786.