Relevance through consortium research? Findings from an expert interview study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6105 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 16-30

  Otto, Boris ^a   Österle, Hubert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Consortium Research; Design Science Research in IS; Expert Interviews; Research Relevance

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY IS; CONSORTIUM RESEARCH; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH IN IS; EXPERT INTERVIEWS; INTERVIEW STUDY; RESEARCH ACTIVITIES; RESEARCH PROCESS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; RESEARCH RESULTS;

DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

RESEARCH;

EID: 79955116120     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information System Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75-105 (2004)
2. Winter, R.: Design Science Research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 470-475 (2008)
3. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 45-77 (2008)
4. Guide, V.D.R.J., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Dancing with the Devil: Partnering with Industry but Publishing in Academia. Decision Sciences 38, 531-546 (2007)
5. Starkey, K., Madan, P.: Bridiging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research. British Journal of Management 12, S3-S26 (2001)
6. Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.: Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Quarterly 23, 3-16 (1999)
7. Brinkkemper, S.: Method Engineering: Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools. Information and Software Technology 38, 275-280 (1996)
8. Frank, U., Schauer, C., Wigand, R.T.: Different Paths of Development of Two Information Systems Communities: A Comparative Study Based on Peer Interviews. Communications of the AIS 22, 391-412 (2008)
9. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251-266 (1995)
10. Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach. Design Research Workshop within the IRIS26 (2003)
11. Frank, U.: Evaluation von Artefakten in der Wirtschaftsinformatikforschung. In: Häntschel, I., Heinrich, L.J. (eds.) Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 35-48. Oldenbourg, München (2000)
12. Bucher, T., Riege, C., Saat, J.: Evaluation in der gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik - Systematisierung nach Erkenntnisziel und Gestaltungsziel. In: Becker, J., Krcmar, H., Niehaves, B. (eds.) Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. Arbeitsbericht Nr. 120 des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 69-86. Universität Münster, Münster (2008)
13. Gill, G., Bhattacherjee, A.: Whom Are We Informing? Issues and Recommendations for MIS Research From an Informing Sciences Perspective. MIS Quarterly 33, 217-235 (2009)
14. Back, A., von Krogh, G., Enkel, E.: The CC Model as Organizational Design Striving to Combine Relevance and Rigor. Systemic Practice and Action Research 20, 91-103 (2007)
15. Følstad, A.: Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10, 99-131 (2008)
16. Brockhoff, K.: Forschung und Entwicklung: Planung und Kontrolle. Oldenbourg, München (1999)
17. Pettigrew, A.M.: Management Research After Modernism. British Journal of Management 12, S61-S70 (2001)
18. Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
19. David, P., Foray, D.: Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. In: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris (1994)
20. Rynes, S.L., Bartunek, J.M., Daft, R.L.: Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer between Practitioners and Academics. Academy of Mangement Journal 44, 340-355 (2001)
21. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
22. Mathiassen, L., Nielsen, P.A.: Engaged Scholarship in IS Research: The Scandinavian Case. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20, 3-20 (2008)
23. Österle, H., Otto, B.: A Method For Consortial Research. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2009)
24. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., Sinz, E.J.: Memorandum zur gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Österle, H., Winter, R., Brenner, W. (eds.) Gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik: Ein Plädoyer für Rigor und Relevanz. infowerk ag, pp. 1-6 (2010)
25. Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7, 89-106 (1991)
26. Cavana, R.Y.: Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons, Australia (2001)
27. Ethridge, D.: Research methodology in applied economics: organizing, planning, and conducting economic research. Iowa State University Press, Ames (1995)
28. Wilde, T., Hess, T.: Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Eine empirische Untersuchung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 49, 280-287 (2007)
29. Otto, B., Österle, H.: Relevance Through Consortium Research? A Case Study. In: 18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2010), Pretoria (2010)
30. Knödler, T.: Public Relations und Wirtschaftsjournalismus: Erfolgs- und Risikofaktoren für einen win-win. VS, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2005)
31. Meuser, M., Nagel, U.: Expertenwissen und Experteninterview. In: Hitzler, R., Honer, A., Maeder, C. (eds.) Expertenwissen. Die institutionelle Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit, pp. 180-192. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1994)
32. Meuser, M., Nagel, U.: ExpertInneninterviews - vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In: Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W. (eds.) Das Experteninterview. Theorie, Methode, Anwendung, pp. 71-93. Leske und Budrich, Opladen (2002)
33. Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1, Art. 20 (2000)
34. Jarvinen, P.H.: Research Questions Guiding Selection of an Appropriate Research Method. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 124-131 (2000)
35. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30, 611-642 (2006)