A wish, a fear and a complaint: Understanding the (dis)engagement of forest owners in forest management

European Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 435-450

  Domínguez, Gloria ^a   Shannon, Margaret ^b  

^a CENTRE TECNOLÒGIC FORESTAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LANDOWNERSHIP; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

CATALONIA; SPAIN;

EID: 79955094483     PISSN: 16124669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-009-0332-0     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Amacher G et al. (2003) Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: Is there anything left to study?. J Forest Econ (9): 137-164.
2. Amacher G, Conway C et al (2004) Nonindustrial forest landowner research: a synthesis and new directions. In: Rauscher HM, Johnsen KK (eds) Southern forest science: past, present, and future, pp 241-252.
3. Amacher G (1997) The design of forest taxation: a synthesis with future directions. Silva Fennica 31: 101-119.
4. Amacher G, Koskela E et al (2002) Bequest intentions of forest landowners: theory and empirical evidence. Am J Agric Econ 84(4): 1103-1114.
5. Badia A, Mira N (2007) Vulnerabilitat i percepció del risc d'incendi forestal en zones d'interfase urbana forestal. El cost real de viure a les àrees d'interfase. VI Trobada d'Estudiosos de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l'Obac. Diputació de Barcelona, Barcelona.
6. Barstadt J (1997) Local-based factors that affects small-scale forest households in Western Norway: a qualitative study. Proceedings of IUFRO Symposium: Sustainable management of small scale forestry. Y. MURASHIMA. Kyoto University, Graduate School of Agriculture.
7. Baum A, Fleming R et al (1983) Natural disaster and technological catastrophe. Environ Behav 15(3): 333-354.
8. Beach RH, Pattanayak SK et al (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: A review and synthesis. Forest Policy Econ 7(3): 261-281.
9. Beck U (1992) Risk society, towards a new modernity. Sage, London.
10. Beebe GS, Omi PN (1993) Wildland burning: the perception of risk. J Forestry 91: 19-24.
11. Bieling C (2004) Non-industrial private-forest owners: possibilities for increasing adoption of close-to-nature forest management. Eur J Forest Res 123(4): 293-303.
12. Binkley (1981) Timber supply from private non-industrial forest. Bull Yale School Forestry Stud 92: 97.
13. Bliss J, Martin JA (1989) Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Sci 35(2): 601-622.
14. Bliss J, Martin A (1990) How tree farmers view management incentives. J Forestry 88(8): 23-30.
15. Bontron JC, Stephan JM (1998) Essai de typologie des espaces forestiers montagnards. Revue-Forestiere-Francaise 50(Special issue): 17-30.
16. Boon TE, Meilby H (2004) Relations between owner characteristics and forest ownership objectives. Proceedings of the human dimensions of family, farm and community forestry international symposium. D. M. Baumgartner, Pullmann: 75-79.
17. Boudon R (1996) The cognitivist model: a generalized rationa-choice model. Rational Society 8: 123-150.
18. Bourke L, Luloff AE (1994) Attitudes toward the management of non-industrial private forest land. Society Nat Res 7(5): 445-457.
19. Boyd R (1984) Government support of non-industrial production: the case of private forests. South Econ J 51(1): 89-107.
20. Brunson M, Reiter DK (1996) Effects of ecological information of judgements about scenic impacts of timber harvest. J Environ Manag 46: 31-41.
21. Butler BJ, Tyrrell M et al (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J Forestry 105(7): 348-357.
22. Carroll M, Cohn P et al (2004) Private and tribal forest landowners and fire risk: a two-county case study in Washington State. Can J Forest Res 34: 2148-2158.
23. Carvalho-Mendes A (2005) Forest owners collective action against the risk of fores fire: a game theoretical approach. Working paper in economics. http://ideas. repec. org/p/cap/wpaper/022007. html Accessed 20 March 2008.
24. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage publications, Ltd, London.
25. Cheng AS (2002) Fire social science research: opening remarks. Fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration: conference proceedings. PN Omi and LAc Joyce. Fort Collins, CO, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 209-212.
26. Coleman CL (1993) The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Commun Res 20(4): 611-628.
27. Conway MC, Amacher GS et al (2003) Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: an empirical examination. J Forest Econ 9: 181-203.
28. CPF (2007) Memoria 2006. Memòries del Centre de la Propietat Forestal. Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, Catalonia, Spain.
29. Cubbage FW (2003) The value of foresters. Forest Landowner 62(1): 16-19.
30. Deane P (2004) A failing science: Understanding private landowners in the forestry milieu. the School of Resources, Environment and Society. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, p 238.
31. Deci E, Ryan R (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contem Edu Psychol 25: 54-67.
32. DGCN (2002) Los incendios forestales en España. Decenio 1991-2000. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
33. Douglas M (1966) Purity and danger: an analysis on concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul T, London.
34. Eckmüllner O (1950) Zur Bauernwalsfrage in Östereich. Allgemeine Forstzeitung 61(15-16): 129-133.
35. Egan AF (1997) From timber to forests and people: a view of nonindustrial private forest research. North J Appl Forestry 14(4): 189-193.
36. Egan AF, Jones SB (1993) Do landowners practices reflect beliefs? Implications of an extension-research partnership. J Forestry 10(93): 39-45.
37. Egan AF, Jones SB (1995) The reliability of landowner survey responses to questions on forest ownership and harvesting. North J Appl Forestry 12(4): 184-186.
38. Elster J (1991) Rationality and social norms. Eur J Sociol/Arch Europeennes de Sociologie 32(1): 109-120.
39. Elster J (1999) Alchemies of the mind: rationality and the emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Frey BS (1997) Not just for the money. An economic theory of personal motivation. Brookfiels, Edward Elgar Publishing.
41. Gardner PD, Cortner HJ et al (1987) The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban homeowners. Landscape Urban Plan 14: 163-172.
42. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity Press, New York.
43. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovering of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago.
44. González J, Palahí M et al (2006) A fire probability model for forest stands in Catalonia (north-east Spain). Ann Forestry Sci 63: 169-176.
45. Gregory G (1995) Persuading the public to make better use of natural hazards information. Prometheus 13(1): 61-71.
46. Hardie IW, Parks PJ (1996) Program enrollment and acreage response to reforestation cost-sharing programs. Land Econ 72: 248-260.
47. Jones SB, Luloff AE et al (1995) Another look at NIPFs: facing our 'myths'. J Forestry 93(9): 41-44.
48. Kallio T (1997) Forest owner's attitudes and estimates of nonmarket benefits of forestry: case study. Proceedings of the IUFRO Symposium: Sustainable management of small scale forestry. Y. Murashima. Kyoto, University, Graduate School of Agriculture: 166-172.
49. Karpinnen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32(1): 43-59.
50. Kasperson RE, Ortwin R et al (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2): 177-187.
51. Keniston R (1962) The forest owner-a person. J Forestry 60(4): 249-254.
52. Kunreuther H (1978) Disaster insurance protection: public policy lessons. Wiley, New York.
53. Kuuluvainen J, Salo J (1991) Timber supply and life cycle harvest of non-industrial private forest owners: an empirical analysis of the Finnish case. Forest Sci 8(37): 1011-1029.
54. Kvarda ME (2004) Non-agricultural forest owners' in Austria-a new type of ownership. Forest Policy Econ 6(5): 459-467.
55. Laing RD (1969) The divided self. Penguin, Harmondsworth (UK).
56. Lidestav G (1998) Women as non-industrial private forest landowners in Sweden. Scand J Forest Res 13(1): 66-73.
57. Lindenberg S (2001) Intrinsic motivation in a new light. KYKLOS 54(2/3): 317-342.
58. Lindsey J (2001) Conceptualizing demands for recognition as ontological security. University of Columbia, Birmingham.
59. Lönnstedt L (1989) Goals and cutting decisions of private small forest owner. Scand J Forest Res 4: 259-265.
60. Marey M, Crescente R, et al. (2002) Methodology for inventorying and characterizing non-industrial private forestry (only abstract). Proceedings of the JS9 spatial information and land management. FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D. C. USA.
61. Marey MF, Rodriguez V et al (2007) Perfil do propietario forestal individual en Galicia: Obxectivos e prácticas de xestión no nordeste da comunidade. Revista Galega de Economia 16(1): 47-70.
62. Mitzen J (2006) Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma. Eur J Int Relations 12(3): 341-370.
63. Montiel C (2007) Traditional knowledge, cultural heritage and sustainable forest management. Forest Ecol Manag 249(1-2): 80-90.
64. Nelson K, Monroe M et al (2004) Living with fire: homeowner assessment of landscape values and defensible space in Minnesota and Florida, USA. Int J Wildland Fire 13(4): 413-425.
65. Newman D, Wear D (1993) Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and non-industrial forest owners. Am J Agric Econ 75: 674-684.
66. Ollikainen M (1996) Analytics of timber supply and forest taxation under endogenous credit rationing-separability after all. J Forest Econ 2(2): 93-126.
67. Pascoa F, Joao C (1999) Portugal. Sampling schemes for monitoring the socioeconomic of farm forestry. E. F. Institute, Joensuu, pp 171-175.
68. Pattanayak SK, Murray BC et al (2002) How joint is joint forest production? An econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Sci 48(3): 479-491.
69. Pijawka KD, Cuthbertson BA et al (1987-1988) Coping with extreme hazard events: emerging themes in natural and technological disaster research. Omega 18(4): 281-297.
70. Richter KJ, Lewis BJ (2007) Reaching out to family forest owners: an examination of information behaviors by attitudinal type. USDA Forest Service-General Technical Report PNW-GTR (726): 209-217.
71. Rickenbach MG, Kittredge DB et al (1998) Capturing the concept for woodland owners. J Forestry 96(4): 18-24.
72. Ripati J, Järvelainen V (1997) Forecasting structural changes in non-industrial provate forest ownership in Finland. Scand Forest Econ 36: 215-230.
73. Rodríguez V, Marey M (2008) Assessing the role of the family unit in individual private forestry in northern Spain. Scand J Forest Res 23: 53-77.
74. Ross-Davis AL, Broussard SR et al (2005) Afforestation motivations of private landowners: and examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana. North J Appl Forestry 22(3): 149-153.
75. Slee B, Wiesum F (2001) New opportunities for forest-related rural development in industrialized countries. Forest Policy Econ 3: 1.
76. Slovic P (1987) The perception of risk. Science 236(4799): 280-285.
77. Solberg B, Tikkanen J (2005) Forest policy research in Europe: new methodological and empirical results in the last decade and priorities for the future. Forest in the balance: linking tradition and technology. XXII IUFRO World Congress. Innes JL, Edwards IK, Wildford DJ. Brisbane, Australia, Int Forest Rev 7: 136.
78. Stoddart C (1942) Future of private forest land ownership in the northern Lake States. J Land Pub Utility Econ 18(3): 267-283.
79. Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
80. Tábara D (1996) La percepció dels problemes del medi ambient. Beta Editorial, Barcelona.
81. Tábara D, Saurí D et al (2003) Forest fire risk management and public participation in changing socioenvironmental conditions: a case study in a mediterranean region. Risk Anal 23(2): 249-260.
82. Tahvonen O (1998) Bequests, credit rationing and in situ values in the Faustmann-Pressler-Ohlin forestry model. Scand J Econ 100(4): 781-800.
83. Taylor S (1989) Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
84. Tena J (2006) Informe sobre les impresions de les entrevistes exploratories als propietaris forestals de Catalunya. Centre Tecnologic Forestal de Catalunya, Solsona, p 10.
85. Turnquist SM (1994) Fouling the communal nest: community as a unit of analysis in sociology of risk. American Sociological Association, USA.
86. Vayreda J (2004) Gestió Forestal. Els boscos de Catalunya. Estructura, dinàmica i funcionament. Terradas J, Rodà F. Barcelona, Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Medi Ambient i Habitatge. 95-111: 96-113.
87. Winter G, Fried J (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsability and management strategies at the wildland-urban interface. Society Nat Res 13(1): 33-49.
88. Zhang Y, Zhang D et al (2005) Small-scale non-industrial private forest ownership in the United States: rationale and implications for forest management. Silva Fennica 39(3): 443-454.
89. Ziegenspeck S, Härdter U et al (2004) Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change. Forest Policy Econ 6(5): 447-458.