Assessing the role of the family unit in individual private forestry in northern Spain

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-77

  Vicente, Verónica Rodríguez ^a,c   Pérez, Manuel Francisco Marey ^b  

^a Galician Sectorial Forestry Association (ASEFOGA)   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bequest; Forest labour; Forest reinvestment; Household income; Logistic support; Non industrial private forest owner

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HARVESTING; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

BEQUEST; FAMILY UNIT; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; LOGISTIC SUPPORT;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; HARVESTING;

EID: 39349091393     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580701672212     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arano, K. G., Munn, I. A., Gunter, J. E., Bullard, S. H. & Doolitle, M. L. (2004). Comparison between regenerators and non-regenerators in Mississippi: A discriminant analysis. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22, 132-138.
2. Beiras, X. M. (1975). A emigración: O seu papel na dinámica da formación social [Emigration: Its role in social formation dynamics]. In D. García-Sabell (Ed.),, A Galicia rural na encrucillada [Rural Galicia at a crossroad] (pp. 39-73). Vigo, Spain: Galaxia.
3. Bolkesjø, T. F. & Baardsen, S. (2002). Roundwood supply in Norway: Micro-level analysis of self-employed forest owners. Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 55-64.
4. Butler, B. J., Swenson, J. J. & Alig, R. J. (2004). Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: Quantification and correlations. Forest Ecology and Management, 189, 363-373.
5. Cao, R. (2002). Análisis multivariante. Curso de postgrado en estadística aplicada [Multivariate analysis. A postgraduate course on applied statistics]. A Coruña, Spain: University of A Coruña.
6. Conway, M. C., Amacher, G. S. & Sullivan, B. J. (2003). Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: An empirical examination. Journal of Forest Economics, 9, 181-203.
7. Dennis, D. (1990). A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 176-187.
8. Dewees, P. A. (1992). Social and economic incentives for smallholder tree growing: A case study from Muranga District, Kenya. Community forestry case study series, 5. Rome: FAO.
9. Dole, A. (1995). The economics of private forest management unifying the Faustmann model and nonindustrial private forest management models. Nedlands: University of Western Australia.
10. Finley, A. O. (2002). Assessing private forest landowners' attitudes towards, and ideas for, cross-boundary cooperation in western Massachusetts. Amherst, USA: Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
11. Gunter, J. E., Bullard, S. H., Doolitle, M. L. & Arano, K. G. (2001). Reforestation of harvested timberlands in Mississippi: Behaviour and attitudes of non-industrial private forest landowners. Mississippi: Mississippi State University.
12. Hardie, I. W. & Parks, P. J. (1996). Program enrollment and acreage response to reforestation cost-sharing programs. Land Economics, 72, 248-260.
13. Hodges, D. G. & Cubbage, F. W. (1990). Adoption behaviour of technical assistance foresters in the southern pine region. Forest Science, 36, 516-530.
14. INE (2004). Consumer price index. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from http://www.ine.es/daco/ipc. htm
15. Ingemarson, F., Lindhagen, A. & Eriksson, L. (2006). A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 249-259.
16. Karppinen, H. (1998). Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica, 32, 43-59.
17. Karppinen, H. (2005). Forest owners' choice of reforestation method: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 393-409.
18. Kittredge, D. B. (2005). The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 671-688.
19. Kline, J. D., Butler, B. J. & Alig, R. J. (2002). Tree planting in the south: What does the future hold? Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 26, 99-107.
20. Kurttila, M., Hamalainen, K., Kajanus, M. & Pesonen, M. (2001). Non-industrial private forest owners' attitudes towards the operational environment of forestry - A multinominal logit model analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 13-28.
21. Kuuluvainen, J. & Salo, J. (1991). Timber supply and life cycle harvest of non-industrial private forest owners: An empirical analysis of the Finnish case. Forest Science, 37, 1011-1029.
22. Kuuluvainen, J., Karppinen, H. & Ovaskainen, V. (1996). Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science, 42, 300-308.
23. Li, Y. & Zhang, D. (2004). Tree planting in the US south: A panel data analysis. Washington, DC: Auburn University.
24. Löyland, K., Kringstad, V. & Öy, H. (1995). Determinants of forest activities - A study of private non-industrial forestry in Norway. Journal of Forest Economics, 1, 219-237.
25. Mahapatra, A. K. & Mitchell, C. P. (2001). Classifying tree planters and non planters in a subsistence farming system using a discriminant analytical approach. Agroforestry Systems, 54, 41-52.
26. Marey, M. F. (2003). Tenencia de la tierra en Galicia: Modelo para la caracterización de los propietarios forestales [Land tenure in Galicia: A model for forest landowner characterization]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
27. Marey, M. F., Rodríguez, V. & Crecente, R. (2004). El monte en Galicia en el siglo XXI: Balance evolutivo y consideraciones para el futuro [Galician forests during the 21st century: Evolution and considerations for the future]. In A. Maya (Ed.), ¿Qué futuro para los espacios rurales? (pp. 117-125). León, Spain: Universidad de León.
28. Marey, M. F., Rodriguez, V. & Crecente, R. (2006). Using GIS to measure changes in the temporal and spatial dynamics of forestland: Experiences from north-west Spain. Forestry, 79, 409-423.
29. Munn, I. & Rucker, R. (1994). The value of information in a market for factors of production with multiple attributes: The role of consultants in private timber sales. Forest Science, 40, 474-486.
30. Nagubadi, V., McNamara, K. T., Hoover, W. L. & Mills, W. L., Jr (1996). Program participation behaviour of nonindustrial forest landowners: A probit analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28, 323-336.
31. Pattanayak, S. K., Murray, B. C. & Abt, R. (2002). How joint is joint forest production: An econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Science, 48, 479-491.
32. Potter-Witter, K. (2005). A cross-sectional analysis of Michigan nonindustrial private forest landowners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22, 132-138.
33. Prestemon, J. & Wear, D. (2000). Linking harvest choices to timber supply. Forest Science, 46, 377-389.
34. Rickenbach, M., Zeuli, K. & Sturgess-Cleek, E. (2005). Despite failure: The emergence of "new" forest owners in private forest policy in Wisconsin, USA. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 503-513.
35. Ross-Davis, A. L., Broussard, S. R., Jacobs, D. F. & Davis, A. S. (2005). Afforestation motivations of private landowners: An examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22, 149-153.
36. Slee, B. & Wiesum, F. (2001). New opportunities for forest-related rural development in industrialized countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 3, 1-4.
37. Sukhatme, P. U. (1953). Sampling theory of surveys. Rome: FAO.
38. Zhang, D. & Flick, W. (2001). Sticks, carrots and reforestation investment. Land Economics, 77, 443-456.
39. Zhang, D. & Mehmood, S. R. (2001). Predicting nonindustrial private forest landowners' choice of a forester for harvesting and tree planting assistance in Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 25, 101-107.