How to build a robust model against perturbation factors with only a few reference values: A chemometric challenge at 'Chimiométrie 2007'

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 152-159

  Fernández Pierna, Juan Antonio ^a   Chauchard, Fabian ^b   Preys, Sébastien ^b   Roger, Jean Michel ^c   Galtier, Oswin ^d   Baeten, Vincent ^a   Dardenne, Pierre ^a  

^a WALLOON AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^b Ondalys ^*  (France)

^c MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Challenge; Chemometrics; Reference values; Robust

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CHEMOMETRICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REFERENCE DATABASE; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 79955083767     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dardenne P., Fernández Pierna J.A. A NIR data set is the object of a Chemometric contest at 'Chimiométrie 2004'. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2006, 80:236-242.
2. Fernández Pierna J.A., Dardenne P. Chemometric contest at 'Chimiométrie 2005': a discrimination study. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2007, 86:219-223.
3. Fernández Pierna J.A., Dardenne P. Soil parameter quantification by NIRS as a Chemometric challenge at 'Chimiométrie 2006'. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2008, 91:94-98.
4. Daszykowski M., Kaczmarek K., Vander Heyden Y., Walczak B. Robust statistics in data analysis-a review. Basic concepts. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2007, 85:203-219.
5. P.J. Huber (1981), Robust Statistics, John Wiley and Sons eds., New York.
6. Wakeling I.N., MacFie H.J.H. A robust PLS procedure. Journal of Chemometrics 1992, 6:189-198.
7. Griep M.I., Wakeling I.N., Vankeerberghen P., Massart D.L. Comparison of semirobust and robust partial least squares procedures. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1995, 29(1):37-50.
8. Serneels S., Croux C., Filzmoser P., Van Espen P.J. Partial robust M-regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2005, 79(1-2):55-64.
9. González J., Peña D., Romera R. A robust partial least squares regression method with applications. Journal of Chemometrics 2009, 23(2):78-90.
10. Liebmann B., Filzmoser P., Varmuza K. Robust and classical PLS regression compared. Journal of Chemometrics 2010, 24(3-4):111-120.
11. Gu D.W., Petkov P.H., Konstantinov M.M. Robust Control Design with MATLAB®. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing 2005, Springer, Glasgow, UK. M.J. Grimble, M.A. Johnson (Eds.).
12. Zeaiter M., Roger J.M., Bellon-Maurel V., Rutledge D.N. Robustness of models developed by multivariate calibration. Part I: The assessment of robustness. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2004, 23(2):157-170.
13. Zeaiter M., Roger J.M., Bellon-Maurel V. Robustness of models developed by multivariate calibration. Part II: The influence of pre-processing methods. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2005, 24(5):437-445.
14. Dardenne P., Sinnaeve G., Bollen L., Biston R. Reduction of wet chemistry for NIR calibrations. Leaping ahead with Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Proceedings of the 6th ICNIRS 1994, NIR Spectroscopy Group, Royal Australian Chemical Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. G.D. Batten, P.C. Flinn, L.A. Welsh, A.B. Blakeney (Eds.).
15. Wold S., Antti H., Lindgren F., Öhman J. Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1998, 44(1-2):175-185.
16. Gorry P.A. General least-squares smoothing and differentiation by the convolution (Savitzky-Golay) method. Analytical Chemistry 1990, 62:570-573.
17. Roger J.M., Chauchard F., Bellon-Maurel V. EPO-PLS external parameter orthogonalisation of PLS: application to temperature-independent measurement of sugar content of intact fruits. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2003, 66(2):191-204.
18. Preys S., Roger J.M., Boulet J.C. Robust calibration using orthogonal projection and experimental design. Application to the correction of the light scattering effect on turbid NIR spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2008, 91:28-33.
19. Barnes R.J., Dhanoa M.S., Lister S.J. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Applied Spectroscopy 1989, 43-5:772-777.
20. Davis A.M.C., Fearn T. Back to basics: removing multiplicative effects (1). Spectroscopy Europe 2007, 19(4):24-28.
21. Andrew A., Fearn T. Transfer by orthogonal projection: making near-infrared calibrations robust to between-instrument variation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2004, 72(1):51-56.
22. Isaksson T., Naes T. The effect of multiplicative scatter correction (Msc) and linearity improvement in Nir spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy 1988, 42:1273-1284.
23. Riu J., Bro R. Jack-knife technique for outlier detection and estimation of standard errors in PARAFAC models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2003, 65:35.
24. Cogdill R.P., Dardenne P. Least-squares support vector machines for chemometrics: an introduction and evaluation. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 2004, 12(1):93-100.