Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 516-523

  Johnson, R Duncan ^a   Nguyen, Myhanh T ^b   Lee, Nancy ^c   Hamilton, D Rex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Florida Eye Clinic   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

corneal biomechanics; corneal hysteresis; corneal resistance factor; forme fruste keratoconus; keratoconus; keratoconus severity score; ocular response analyzer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FORME FRUSTE KERATOCONUS; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; KERATOCONUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79955056998     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f0579e     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;11:267-275. (Pubitemid 36184329)
2. Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:176-185. (Pubitemid 40404440)
3. Giledi O, Daya SM. Unexpected flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1825-1826. (Pubitemid 37210624)
4. Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:37-50.
5. Chiang RK, Park AJ, Rapuano CJ, et al. Bilateral keratoconus after LASIK in a keratoconus patient. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:90-92. (Pubitemid 43189074)
6. Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1007-1009. (Pubitemid 28335260)
7. Bilgihan K, Ozdek SC, Konuk O, et al. Results of photorefractive keratectomy in keratoconus suspects at 4 years. J Refract Surg. 2000;16: 438-443. (Pubitemid 30637478)
8. Alpins N, Stamatelatos G. Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:591-602. (Pubitemid 46482956)
9. Bahar I, Levinger S, Kremer I. Wavefront-supported photorefractive keratectomy with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix in patients with myopic astigmatism and suspected keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22: 533-538.
10. Malecaze F, Coullet J, Calvas P, et al. Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:742-746.
11. Leccisotti A. Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:869-875. (Pubitemid 46805618)
12. Smolek M. Interlamellar cohesive strength in the vertical meridian of human eye bank corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2962-2969. (Pubitemid 23269151)
13. Daxer A, Fratzl P. Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implication in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 121-129. (Pubitemid 27051531)
14. Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;6:134-140.
15. Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1327-1335. (Pubitemid 29458516)
16. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, et al. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35: 2749-2757. (Pubitemid 24149786)
17. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 2290-2299. (Pubitemid 27446946)
18. Sonmez B, Doan MP, Hamilton DR. Identification of scanning slit-beam topographic parameters important in distinguishing normal from keratoconic corneal morphologic features. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:401-408.
19. McMahon TT, Szczotka-Flynn L, Barr JT, et al. A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the keratoconus severity score (KSS). Cornea. 2006;25:794-800. (Pubitemid 44657254)
20. Ambrosio R, Alonso RS, Luz A, et al. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1851-1859. (Pubitemid 44647765)
21. Belin MW, Khachikian SS, Ambrósio R, et al. Keratoconus/ectasia detection with the oculus pentacam: Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. Highlights Ophthalmol. 2008:35:5-12.
22. Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Maeda N. Keratoconus detection with the KISA% method-another view. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:472-474. (Pubitemid 30212938)
23. Ou RJ, Shaw EL, Glasgow BJ. Keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:771-773. (Pubitemid 35300403)
24. Lifshitz T, Levy J, Klemperer I, et al. Late bilateral keratectasia after LASIK in a low myopic patient. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:494-496. (Pubitemid 41356294)
25. Amoils SP, Deist MB, Gous P, et al. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than 24.0 to 27.0 diopters of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:967-977. (Pubitemid 30666650)
26. Klein SR, Epstein RJ, Randleman JB, et al. Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patients without apparent preoperative risk factors. Cornea. 2006;25:388-403. (Pubitemid 44620121)
27. Piccoli PM, Gomes AA, Piccoli FV. Corneal ectasia detected 32 months after LASIK for correction of myopia and asymmetric astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1222-1225. (Pubitemid 36759119)
28. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
29. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, et al. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 3026-3031. (Pubitemid 351261143)
30. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, et al. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:257-262. (Pubitemid 44743122)
31. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371-1375. (Pubitemid 47096684)
32. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyzer. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:129-132.
33. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R, Jardim D, et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:673-679.
34. Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, et al. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2912-2916.
35. Kirwan C, O'Malley D, O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert ocular respone analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222:334-337.
36. Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, et al. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2403-2410.
37. Fontes BM, Ambrosio T, Salomao M, et al. Biomechanical and tomographic analysis of unilateral keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009:24;1-5.
38. Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr, Alonso RS, et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of -19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:941-945.
39. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:616-622. (Pubitemid 351444755)