Kinetic study and oxygen transfer efficiency evaluation using respirometric methods in a submerged membrane bioreactor using pure oxygen to supply the aerobic conditions

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 6013-6018

  Rodríguez, Francisco A ^a   Poyatos, José M ^a   Reboleiro Rivas, Patricia ^a   Osorio, Francisco ^a   González López, Jesús ^a   Hontoria, Ernesto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; MBR; Pure oxygen; Wastewater

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AEROBIC CONDITION; DESIGN PARAMETERS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; KINETIC STUDY; MBR; ORGANIC MATERIALS; OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY; POWER INPUT; PURE OXYGEN; SLUDGE RETENTION TIME; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; TREATMENT PLANTS; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOREACTORS; KINETIC PARAMETERS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

OXYGEN SUPPLY;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE; OXIC CONDITIONS; OXYGEN; REACTION KINETICS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; MEMBRANE REACTOR; OXYGEN TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIROMETRY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTEWATER BENCH SCALE ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR;

BIOREACTORS; KINETICS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OXYGEN; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 79955031817     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.083     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. APHA-AWWA-WPCF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste water 1992, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 18th ed.
2. Badino A.C., Facciotti M.C.R., Schmidell W. Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficients (kLa) in batch cultivations involving non-Newtonian broths. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 8:111-119.
3. Brouwer H., Klapwijk A., Keesman K.J. Identification of activated sludge and wastewater characteristics using respirometric batch-experiments. Water Res. 1998, 32(4):1240-1254.
4. Chow, B., Roberts, P., 1979. Halogenated organics production in sewage disinfection with chlorine dioxide and chloride. In: Presented at the National Conference on Environmental Engineering Processes, 9-11 July, San Francisco, CA, USA. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, Virginia.
5. Çokgör E., Sözen S., Insel G., Orhon D. Respirometric evaluation of biodegradation characteristics of dairy wastewater for organic carbon removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 30(11):1169-1176.
6. Cooper, W.J., Villate, J.T., Oh, E.M., Slifker, R.A., Parsons, F.Z., Graves, G.A., 1983. Formation of organohalogen compounds in chlorited secondary wastewater effluent. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Water Chlorination. Chemistry Environmental Impact and Health Effects, vol. 4, pp. 483-497.
7. Cote P., Masini M., Mourato D. Comparate of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation. Desalination 2004, 167:1-11.
8. Damayanti A., Ujang Z., Salim M.R., Olsson G., Sulaiman A.Z. Respirometric analysis of activated sludge models from palm oil mill effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:144-149.
9. De Lucas A., Cañiñares P., Rodríguez L., Villaseñor J. Respirometric determination of the readily biodegradable cod produced in the anaerobic stage of a biological phosphorus removal process. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A 2000, 35(1):49-64.
10. Ferrai M., Guglielmi G., Andreottola G. Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Modell. Software 2010, 25:626-632.
11. Germain E., Stephenson T., Pearche P. Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration; toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors; their interrelations explained by a review of aerobic biological processes. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2005, 4:223-233.
12. Ghyoot W., Verstraete W. Reduced sludge production in a two-stage membrane-assisted bioreactor. Water Res. 2000, 34:205-215.
13. Germain E., Stephenson T. Biomass characteristics, aeration and oxygen transfer in membrane bioreactors: their interrelations explained by a review of aerobic biological processes. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 4:223-233.
14. Grady C.P.L., Smets B.F., Barbeau D.S. Variability in kinetic parameter estimates: a review of possible causes and a proposed terminology. Water Res. 1996, 30:742-748.
15. Helle, S., 1999. A Respirometric Investigation of the Activated Sludge Treatment of BKME during Steady State and Transient Operating Conditions. Thesis, University of British, Columbia.
16. Henze M., Grady C.P.L., Gujer W., Marais G., Matsuo T. Activated Sludge Model No. 1 by IAWPRC Task Group on Mathematical Modelling for Design and Operation of Biological Wastewater Treatment. Effect of Sludge Retention Time on Microbial Behaviour in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor 1986, IAWPRC, Londres.
17. Huang X., Gui P., Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36:1001-1006.
18. Iranpour R., Magallanes A., Zermeño M., Varsh V., Brishamchi A., Stenstrom M. Assessment of aeration basin performance efficiency: sampling methods and tank coverage. Water Res. 2000, 34(12):3137-3152.
19. Judd S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment 2006, Elsevier, UK.
20. Liang Z., Das A., Beerman D., Hu Z. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Res. 2010, 44:3313-3320.
21. Liu Y. Bioenergetic interpretation on the So/Xo ration in substrate-sufficient batch culture. Water Res. 1996, 30:2766-2770.
22. Nguyen T.T., Guo W., Ngo H.H., Vigneswaran S. A new combined inorganic-organic flocculant (CIOF) as a performance enhancer for aerated submerged membrane bioreactor. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:204-209.
23. Macomber J., Cicek N., Suidan M.T., Davel J., Ginestet P., Audic J.M. Biological kinetic data evaluation of an activated sludge system coupled with an ultrafiltration membrane. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131:579-586.
24. Metcalf and Eddy Ingeniería de aguas residuales. Tratamiento, vertido y reutilización 2000, McGraw Hill, New York. third ed.
25. Molina-Muñoz M., Poyatos J.M., Vílchez R., Hontoria E., Rodelas B., González-López J. Effect of the concentration of suspended solids on the enzymatic activities and biodiversity of a submerged membrane bioreactor for aerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 73:1441-1451.
26. Mueller J., Boyle W., Papel H. Aeration: Principles and Practice 2002, CRC Press, Florida.
27. Ozbek B., Gayik S. The studies on the oxygen mass transfer coefficient in a bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36:729-741.
28. Pazoki M., Takdastan A., Jaafarzadeh N. Investigation of minimization of excess sludge production in sequencing batch reactor by heating some sludge. Asian J. Chem. 2010, 22(3):1751-1759.
29. Poyatos J.M., Molina-Muñoz M., Moreno B., González-López J., Hontoria E. Effect of the mixed liquor suspended solid on permeate in a membrane bioreactor system applied for the treatment of sewage mixed with wastewater of the milk from the dairy industry. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Toxicol. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2007, 42:1005-1012.
30. Poyatos J.M., Molina-Muñoz M., González-López J., Hontoria E. Particle size distribution in permeate from a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor system under actual operating conditions. Part. Sci. Technol. 2010, 28(4):309-318.
31. Ribes J., Keesman K., Spanjers H. Modelling anaerobic biomass growth kinetics with a substrate threshold concentration. Water Res. 2004, 38:4502-4510.
32. Rodríguez F.A., Martínez-Toledo M.V., González-López J., Hontoria E., Poyatos J.M. Performance of bench-scale membrane bioreactor under real work conditions using pure oxygen: viscosity and oxygen transfer analysis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 33:885-892.
33. Sollfrank U., Gujer W. Characterisation of domestic wastewater for mathematical modelling of the activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 1991, 23:1057-1066.
34. Spanjers H., Vanrolleghem P.A. Respirometry as a tool for rapid characterization of wastewater and activated sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 31(2):105-114.
35. Stenstrom H.K., Gilbert R.G. Effect of alpha, beta and theta factor upon the design, specification and operation of aeration system. Water Res. 1981, 15:643-654.
36. Stephenson T., Judd S., Jefferson B., Brindle K. Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment 2002, IWAI Publishing, Cornwall.
37. Tazi-pain A., Shorotter J.C., Bord G., Payreaudeau M., Buisson H. Recent improvement of the BIOSEP process for industrial and municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 2002, 146:439-443.
38. Van der Roest H.F., Lawrence D.P., Van Bentem A.G.N. Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment 2002, IWAI Publishing, Cornwall.
39. Vanrolleghem P., Spanjers H. A hybrid respirometric method for more reliable assessment of activated sludge model parameter. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37(12):237-246.
40. Xia S., Li S., He S., Xie K., Wang X., Zhang Y., Duan L., Zhang Z. The effect of organic loading on bacterial community composition of membrane biofilms in a submerged polyvinyl chloride membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:6601-6609.
41. Xing C.H., Tardieu E., Qian Y., Wen X.-H. Ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for urban wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 177:73-82.