Particle size distribution in permeate from a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor system under actual operating conditions

Particulate Science and Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 309-318

  Poyatos, J M ^a   Molina Munoz, M ^a   Gonzalez Lopez, J ^a   Hontoria, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

biosolid; membrane bioreactor; membrane fouling; particle size distribution; wastewater; wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PRODUCTS; CHEMICAL TREATMENTS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MIXED LIQUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS; OPERATING CONDITION; PARTICLE NUMBERS; PILOT-SCALE MEMBRANES; RESEARCH STUDIES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOCONVERSION; BIOFILMS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOREACTORS; BIOSOLIDS; CHEMICAL CLEANING; HYDRAULICS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; PARTICLE SIZE; PILOT PLANTS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

WATER RECYCLING;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR DESIGN; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PARTICLE RESUSPENSION; PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; WATER SAMPLING;

EID: 77955502517     PISSN: 02726351     EISSN: 15480046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2010.496297     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams, M. H. 1959. Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Publishers.
2. APHA (American Public Health Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), and WPCF (Water Pollution Control Federation). 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, D.C.: APHA, AWWA, and WPCF.
3. Bae, T. H., and T. M. Tak. 2005. Interpretation of fouling characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes during the filtration of membrane bioreactor mixed liquor. J. Membr. Sci. 264: 151-160.
4. Bouhabila, E. H., R. B. A?m, and H. Buisson. 2001. Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23: 123-132.
5. Chang, I.-S., P. Le Clech, B. Jefferson, and S. Judd. 2002. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 128 (11): 1018-1028.
6. Côté, P., H. Buisson, C. Pound, and G. Arakaki. 1997. Immersed membrane activated sludge for the reuse of municipal wastewater. Desalination 113 (2-3): 189-196.
7. Defrance, L., M. Y. Jaffrin, B. Gupta, P. Paullier, and V. Geaugey. 2000. Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 73: 105-112.
8. Itonaga, T., K. Kimura, and Y. Watanabe. 2004. Influence of suspension viscosity and colloidal particles on permeability of membrane used in membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water Sci. Technol. 50: 301-309.
9. Judd, S. 2006. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Boston: Elsevier.
10. Kang, S., W. Lee, S. Chae, and H. Shin. 2007. Positive role of biofilm during the operation of bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination 202: 129-134.
11. Kim, J. H., K.-H. Choo, H. S. Yi, S. Lee, and C.-H. Lee. 2001. Effect of membrane support material on permeability in the microfiltration of brining wastewater. Desalination 140 (1): 55-65.
12. Leiknes, T., and H. ødegaard. 2007. The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination 202 (1-3): 135-143.
13. Oron, G., L. Gillerman, N. Buriakovsky, A. Bick, M. Gargir, Y. Dolan, Y. Manor, L. Katz, and J. Hagin. 2008. Membrane technology for advanced wastewater reclamation for sustainable agriculture production. Desalination 218: 170-180.
14. Pearce, G. K. 2008. UF=MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: A comparison of energy costs. Desalination 222: 66-73.
15. Poyatos, J. M., M. Molina-Munoz, B. Moreno, J. González- López, and E. Hontoria. 2007. Effect of the liquor suspended solid on permeate in a membrane biorreactor system applied for the treatment of the sewage mixed with wastewater of the milk from the dairy industry. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A 42: 1005-1012.
16. Poyatos, J. M., M. Molina-Munoz, F. Delgado, J. González- López, and E. Hontoria. 2008. Flux influence on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor system under real conditions with urban wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A 43: 1685-1691.
17. Smith, C. V., D. O. Gregorio, and R. M. Talcott. 1969. The use of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge separation. In Proceedings of the 24th Industrial Waste Conference. Lafayette, Ind.: Department of Engineering Extension, Purdue University. pp. 1300-1310.
18. Stephenson, T., S. Judd, B. Jefferson, and K. Brindle. 2002. Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment. Cornwall, UK: IWAI Publishing.
19. UNE-EN ISO 7887. 1994. Calidad del Agua. Examen y determinació n del color. (Spanish language version).
20. UNE-EN ISO 9308-9401 2001. Calidad del Agua. Detección y recuento de Escherichia coli y de bacterias coliformes. (Spanish language version).
21. Wisniewski, C., and A. Grasmick. 1998. Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 138: 403-411.
22. Yang, W., N. Cicek, and J. Ilg. 2006. State-of-art of membrane bioreactors: Worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 270 (1-2): 201-211.
23. Zhou, Y., Z.-L. Xu, X.-R. Li, and W.-X. Bao. 2008. Study on membrane fouling behavior during synthetic refractory wastewater treatment using SMBR with hollow fiber module. Environ. Eng. Sci. 25 (5): 703-711.