Variation in the proportion of flower visitors of Arum maculatum along its distributional range in relation with community-based climatic niche analyses

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 728-734

  Espíndola, Anahí ^a   Pellissier, Loïc ^b   Alvarez, Nadir ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTAGONISM; FLOWER VISITING; FLY; MONOCOTYLEDON; NICHE PARTITIONING; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EUROPE;

ARTHROPODA; ARUM; ARUM MACULATUM; HEXAPODA; PSYCHODA PHALAENOIDES; PSYCHODIDAE;

EID: 79955026640     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18937.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baldwin I. T. et al. 2006. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: "Talking trees" in the genomics era. Science 311: 812-815.
2. Beck I. 1983. Blütenökologie Untersuchungen am Aronstab (Arum maculatum L.). Spezielle Botanik. - Univ. of Tübingen, p. 123.
3. Boyce P. C. 1993. The genus Arum. R. Bot. Gard. Kew.
4. Boyce P. C. 2006. Arum- a decade of change. Aroideana 29: 132-137.
5. Brodie E. D. and Ridenhour B. J. 2002. Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution. Integr. Compar. Biol. 42: 1202-1202.
6. Bronstein J. L. 2009. The evolution of facilitation and mutualism. J. Ecol. 97: 1160-1170.
7. Chinery M. 1976. Les insectes d'Europe. - Elsevier Séquoia.
8. Crowson R. A. 1981. The biology of the Coleoptera. - Academic Press.
9. Débarre F. and Gandon S. 2010. Evolution of specialization in a spatially continuous environment. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1090-1099.
10. Diaz A. and Kite G. C. 2002. A comparison of the pollination ecology of Arum maculatum and A. italicum in England. Watsonia 24: 171-181.
11. Diaz A. and Kite G. C. 2006. Why be a rewarding trap? The evolution of floral rewards in Arum (Araceae), a genus characterized by saprophilous pollination systems. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 88: 257-268.
12. Ehrlich P. R. and Raven P. H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-607.
13. Espíndola A. et al. 2010. New insights into the phylogeny and biogeography of Arum L. (Araceae): unravelling its evolutionary history. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 163: 14-32.
14. Fauna Europaea. 2004. Fauna Europaea ver. 1.1. Accessed 10 January 2010.
15. Gibernau M. et al. 2004. Pollination in the genus Arum- a review. Aroideana 27: 148-166.
16. Gouinguene S. P. and Turlings T. C. J. 2002. The effects of abiotic factors on induced volatile emissions in corn plants. Plant Physiol. 129: 1296-1307.
17. Hijmans R. J. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
18. Hoeksema J. D. and Bruna E. M. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia 125: 321-330.
19. Ježek J. 1990. Redescriptions of nine common palaearctic and holarctic species of Psychodini End. (Diptera: Psychodidae). Acta Entomol. Mus. Natl Pragae 43: 33-83.
20. Ježek J. and Barták M. 2000. Psychodidae. Folia Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Masaryk. Brun. 104: 93-100.
21. Jousselin E. et al. 2008. One fig to bind them all: host conservatism in a fig wasp community unraveled by cospeciation analyses among pollinating and nonpollinating fig wasps. Evolution 62: 1777-1797.
22. Kite G. C. 1995. The floral odour of Arum maculatum. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 23: 343-354.
23. Lack A. J. and Diaz A. 1991. The pollination of Arum maculatum L. - a historical review and new observations. Watsonia 18: 333-342.
24. Laine A. L. 2009. Role of coevolution in generating biological diversity: spatially divergent selection trajectories. J. Exp. Bot. 60: 2957-2970.
25. Lobin W. et al. 2007. A new Arum species (Areae, Araceae) from NE Turkey and Georgia. Willdenowia 37: 445-449.
26. Mayo S. J. et al. 1997. The genera of Araceae. R. Bot. Gard. Kew.
27. McKinney M. L. 1997. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 22.
28. Minorsky P. V. 2003. The hot and the classic. Plant Physiol. 132: 25-26.
29. Oosterbroek P. 2006. The European families of the Diptera. Identification, diagnosis, biology. - KNNV Publishing.
30. Petit D. et al. 2007. On the mating and laying sites of Uromenus brevicollis ssp. insularis in Corsica (Ensifera, Tettigoniidae). J. Orthoptera Res. 16: 145-151.
31. Quézel P. 1985. Definition of the Mediterranean region and the origin of its flora. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 564-571.
32. Ramirez W. B. 1970. Host specificity of fig wasps (Agaonidae). Evolution 24: 680-690.
33. Stanton M. L. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. Am. Nat. 162: S10-S23.
34. ter Braak C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
35. Thioulouse J. et al. 1997. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Comput. 7: 75-83.
36. Thompson J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
37. Thompson J. N. 2005. Coevolution: the geographic mosaic of coevolutionary arms races. Curr. Biol. 15: 992-994.
38. Withers P. 1988. Moth flies. Diptera: Psychodidae. Dipterist Digest 4: 83.