Effects of protein separation conditions on the functional and thermal properties of canola protein isolates

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2011, Pages E266-E273

  Manamperi, Wajira A R ^a   Wiesenborn, Dennis P ^a   Chang, Sam K C ^a,b   Pryor, Scott W ^a  

^a North Dakota State University   (United States)

^b NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Canola; Functional properties; Predictive modeling; Protein isolation; Proteins

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS;

EID: 79955005386     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02087.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahmedna M, Prinyawiwatkul W, Rao RM. 1999. Solubilized wheat protein isolate: functional properties and potential food applications. J Agric Food Chem 47:1340-5.
2. Aluko RE, Yada RY. 1995. Structure-function relationships of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) globulin isolate: influence of pH and NaCl on physicochemical and functional properties. Food Chem 53(3):259-65.
3. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. Washington, D.C. Assn. of Official Analytical Chemists.
4. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. Washington, D.C. Assn. of Official Analytical Chemists.
5. Bell LN, Hageman MJ. 1996. Glass transition explanation for the effect of polyhydroxy compounds on protein denaturation in dehydrated solids. J Food Sci 61(2):372-5.
6. Berot S, Compoint JP, Larre C, Malabat C, Gueguen J. 2005. Large scale purification of rapeseed proteins (Brassica napusL.). J Chromatogr B. 818(1):35-42.
7. Beuchat LR. 1977. Functional and electrophoretic characteristic of succinylated peanut flour proteins. J Agric Food Chem 25:258-60.
8. Brake NC, Fennema OR. 1999. Glass transition values of muscle tissue. J Food Sci 64(1):10-5.
9. Cao Y. 2002. The functional properties of soybean film. Fargo, N. Dak. North Dakota State Univ.
10. Cumby N, Zhong Y, Naczk M, Shahidi F. 2008. Antioxidant activity and water-holding capacity of canola protein hydrolysates. Food Chem 109:144-148.
11. Diosady LL, Rubin LJ, Chen BK. 1990. Membrane based processes for the production of rapeseed protein isolates. Int Cong Eng Food 3:280-9.
12. Dua S, Mahajan A, Mahajan A. 1996. Improvement of functional properties of rapeseed (Brassica campestrisVar.Toria) preparations by chemical modification. J Agric Food Chem 44:706-10.
13. Ghodsvali A, Khodaparast MHH, Vosoughi M, Diosady LL. 2005. Preparation of canola protein materials using membrane technology and evaluation of meals functional properties. Food Res Int 38(2):223-31.
14. Kato A, Nakai S. 1980. Hydrophobicity determined by a fluorescence probe method and its correlation with surface properties of proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 624:13-20.
15. Kinsella JE. 1979. Functional properties of soy proteins. J Am Oil Chem Soc 56:242-58.
16. Kumar R, Choudhary V, Mishra S, Varma IK, Mattiason B. 2002. Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Ind Crop Prod 16(3):155-72.
17. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(259):680-5.
18. Li CP, Enomoto H, Ohki S, Ohtomo H, Aoki T. 2005. Improvement of functional properties of whey protein isolate through glycation and phosphorylation by dry heating. J Dairy Sci 88:4137-45.
19. McCurdy SM. 1990. Effects of processing on the functional properties of canola/rapeseed protein. J Am Oil Chem Soc 67(5):281-4.
20. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. 1995. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y. A Wiley-Interscience publication.
21. Ogungbenle HN. 2008. Effects of salt concentrations on the functional properties of some legume flours. Pak J Nutr 7(3):453-8.
22. Ohren J. 1981. Process and product characteristics for soya concentrates and isolates. J Am Oil Chem Soc 58(3):333-5.
23. Ragab DM, Babiker EE, Eltinay AH. 2004. Fractionation, solubility and functional properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) proteins as affected by pH and/or salt concentration. Food Chem 84:207-12.
24. Satterlee LD, Chang KC. 1982. Nutritional quality of deteriorated proteins. Food protein deterioration. Washington, D.C. American Chemical Society. p 409-31.
25. Schmidt I, Renard D, Rondeau D, Richomme P, Popineau Y, Axelos MAV. 2004. Detailed physicochemical characterization of the 2S storage protein from rape (Brassica napusL.). J Agric Food Chem 52(19):5995-6001.
26. Selmane D, Christophe V, Gholamreza D. 2008. Extraction of proteins from slaughterhouse by-products: influence of operating conditions on functional properties. Meat Sci 79(4):640-7.
27. Tzeng YM, Diosady LL, Rubin LJ. 1990. Production of canola protein materials by alkaline extraction, precipitation, and membrane processing. J Food Sci 55(4):1147-56.
28. Uruakpa FO, Arntfield SD. 2004. Rheological characteristics of commercial canola protein isolate-k-carrageenan systems. Food Hydrocolloid 18:419-27.
29. Warner RC. 1942. The alkaline hydrolysis of egg albumin. J Biol Chem 142:741-56.
30. Whitaker JR. 1978. Biochemical changes occurring during the fermentation of high protein foods. Food Tech 32:175-80.
31. Wu J, Muir AD. 2008. Comparative structural, emulsifying, and biological properties of 2 major canola proteins, cruciferin and napin. J Food Sci 73(1):C210-16.
32. Yu J, Ahmedna M, Goktepe I. 2007. Peanut protein concentrate: production and functional properties as affected by processing. Food Chem 103:121-9.