Mobile phones andcore network growth in Kenya: Strengthening weak ties

Social Science Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 614-625

  Shrum, Wesley ^a   Mbatia, Paul Nyaga ^b   Palackal, Antony ^c   Dzorgbo, Dan Bright S ^d   Duque, Ricardo B ^e   Ynalvez, Marcus Antonius ^f  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

^c Loyola Coll Social Sciences   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GHANA   (Ghana)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^f TEXAS A AND M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell phones; Core network; Friendship network; Kenya; Kenya violence; Longitudinal study; Mobile phones; Panel study; Sub Saharan Africa; Technology adoption; Video ethnography; Video sociology; Visual sociology; Weak ties

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955004726     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bailey, B., Marsden, Peter V., 1999. Interpretation and interview context: examining the general social survey generator using cognitive methods. Social Networks 21, 287-309.
2. Bearman, Peter S., Parigi, Paolo, 2004. Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces 83, 535-557.
3. Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., 1979. Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Communication Research 4, 3-18.
4. Bernard, H.R., Killworth, P.D., McCarty, C., 1982. INDEX: an informant-defined experiment in social structures. Social Forces 61, 99-133.
5. Boase, Jeffrey, Horrigan, John B., Wellman, Barry, Rainie, Lee, 2006. Pew Report: The Strength of Internet Ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington.
6. Bowen, Hannah. 2010. Information at the Grassroots: Analyzing the Media Use and Communication Habits of Kenyans to Support Effective Development. Intermedia Research Report.
7. Burt, Ronald S., 1997. A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks 19, 355-373.
8. Castells, Manuel, Fernandez-Ardevol, Mireia, Qiu, Jack Linchuan, Sey, Araba, 2007. Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge.
9. Donner, Jonathan, 2008. Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature. The Information Society 24, 140-159.
10. Fischer, Claude, 1982. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Fischer, Claude, 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. University of California Press, Berkeley.
12. Fischer, Claude, 2009. Comment: the 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: an artifact?. American Sociological Review 74, 657-669.
13. Fortunati, Leopoldina, 2002. Italy: stereotypes, true and false. In: Katz, James E., Aakhus, Mark (Eds.), Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 42-62.
14. Freeman, L.C., Romney, A.K., Freeman, S.C., 1987. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist 89, 311-325.
15. Granovetter, Mark, 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1368.
16. Hampton, Keith, Wellman, Barry, 2003. Neighboring in Netville: how the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community 2, 277-311.
17. Hampton, Keith, Sessions, Lauren, Her, Eun Ja, Rainie, Lee, 2009. Social Isolation and New Technology: How the internet and mobile phones impact Americans' social networks. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available from: .
18. James, Jeffrey, Versteeg, Mila, 2007. Mobile phones in Africa: how much do we really know?. Social Indicators Research 84, 117-126.
19. Kogovsek, T., Ferligoj, A., 2005. Effects on reliability and validity of egocentered network measurements. Social Networks 27, 205-222.
20. Ling, Richard, 2008. New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Rehaping Social Cohesion. MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. Marsden, Peter V., 1986. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52, 122-131.
22. McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, Brashears, Matthew E., 2006. Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 71, 353-375.
23. Pink, Sarah, 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
24. Putnam, Robert D., 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6, 65-78.
25. Ruan, Danching, 1998. The content of the general social survey discussion networks: an exploration of the general social survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. Social Networks 20, 247-264.
26. Shrum, Wesley, 2005. Reagency of the internet, or, how i became a guest for science. Social Studies of Science 35 (5), 723-754.
27. Shrum, Wesley, Duque, Richard B., Brown, Timothy, 2005. Digital video as research practice: methodology for the millennium. Journal of Research Practice 1 (1), M1.
28. Wang, Hua, Wellman, Barry, 2010. Social connectivity in America: changes in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (8), 1148-1169.
29. Wellman, Barry, 1979. The community question. American Journal of Sociology 84, 1201-1231.
30. Wellman, Barry, Wortley, S., 1990. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 558-588.
31. White, Harrison, 1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
32. Ynalvez, Marcus, Duque, Ricardo B., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, Paul, Dzorgbo, Dan-Bright, Shrum, Wesley, 2005. Productivity patterns, internet use, and diversity among developing world scientists. Scientometrics 63, 39-47.
33. Zhao, Shanyang, Elesh, David, 2008. Co-presence as 'being with': social contact in online public domains. Information, Communication, and Society 11, 565-583.