Evaluation of rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure at deviated angle and position

Current Eye Research

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 422-428

  Takenaka, Joji ^a   Mochizuki, Hideki ^a   Kunihara, Eriko ^a   Tanaka, Junko ^a   Kiuchi, Yoshiaki ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Intraocular pressure; Perkins applanation tonometer; Rabbit; Rebound tonometer; Tonopen XL tonometer; Transducer

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER ANGLE; ARTICLE; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE POSITION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PERKINS HANDHELD APPLANATION TONOMETER; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; REBOUND TONOMETER; RELIABILITY; TONOMETER; TONOPEN XL;

ANIMALS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 79954994724     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.534574     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ausinsch B, Munson ES, Levy NS. Intraocular pressures in children with glaucoma during halothane anesthesia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1977;9:1391-1394. (Pubitemid 8247134)
2. Hetherington Jr J, Shaffer RN. Tonometry and tonography in congenital glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1968;7:134-137.
3. Whitacre MM, Emig M, Hassanein K. The effect of Perkins, Tono-Pen, and Schiötz tonometry on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:59-64.
4. Abrams LS, Vitale S, Jampel HD. Comparison of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:940-944. (Pubitemid 26110445)
5. Jorge J, Díaz-Rey JA, González-Méijome JM, et al. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: A new non-contact tonometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:560-564. (Pubitemid 41711117)
6. Wingert TA, Bassi CJ, McAlister WH, et al. Clinical eval-uation of fve portable tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc 1995;66:670-674.
7. Chiara GF, Semes LP, Potter JW, et al. Portable tonometers: A clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:105-110.
8. Kontiola A. A new electromechanical method for mea-suring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997;93: 265-276.
9. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonom-etry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578-4580. (Pubitemid 44264556)
10. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, et al. The infuence of cor-neal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:80-84. (Pubitemid 350309417)
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160. (Pubitemid 29425900)
12. Lim KS, Wickremasinghe SS, Cordeiro MF, et al. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in New Zealand white rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2419-2423. (Pubitemid 43119488)
13. Prashar A, Guggenheim JA, Erichsen JT, et al. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in chickens using a rebound tonometer: Quantitative evaluation of variance due to posi-tion inaccuracies. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85:563-571. (Pubitemid 47531743)
14. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, et al. The induction/impact tonometer: A new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:781-785. (Pubitemid 34112104)
15. Lasseck J, Jehle T, Feltgen N, et al. Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:1463-1466.
16. Pease ME, Hammond JC, Quigley HA. Manometric calibra-tion and comparison of TonoLab and TonoPen tonometers in rats with experimental glaucoma and in normal mice. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:512-519. (Pubitemid 44760325)