Optimal risky choice in humans: Effects of amount of variability

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 88-99

  Searcy, Gabriel D ^a   Pietras, Cynthia J ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic optimization models; Energy budget; Human; Optimal foraging theory; Risky choice; Variability

Indexed keywords

ENERGY BUDGET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY BUDGET RULE; ENERGY COST; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; ENERGY RESOURCE; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; FORAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RISK; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BUDGETS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 79954934974     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barkan C.P.L. A field test of risk-sensitive foraging in black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Ecology 1990, 71(1):391-400.
2. Barnard C.J., Brown C.A.J. Risk sensitive foraging in common shrews Sorex araneus L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1985, 16:161-164.
3. Bateson M., Kacelnik A. Risk-sensitive foraging: decision making in variable environments. Cognitive Ecology: The Evolutionary Ecology of Information Processing and Decision Making 1998, 297-341. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. R. Dukas (Ed.).
4. Bickel W.K., Giordano L.A., Badger G.J. Risk-sensitive foraging theory elucidates risky choices made by heroin addicts. Addiction 2004, 99:855-861.
5. Caraco T. White crowned sparrows Zonotrichia leucophrys foraging preferences in a risky environment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1983, 12:63-69.
6. Caraco T., Lima S.L. Foraging juncos: interaction of reward mean and variability. Anim. Behav. 1985, 33:216-224.
7. Caraco T., Lima S.L. Survival, energy budgets and foraging risk. Foraging: Quantitative Analyses of Behavior 1987, vol. 6:1-21. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
8. Caraco T., Martindale S., Whittam T.S. An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim. Behav. 1980, 28:820-830.
9. Cartar R.V. A test of risk-sensitive foraging in wild bumble bees. Ecology 1991, 72(3):888-895.
10. Deditius-Island H.K., Szalda-Petree A.D., Kucera S.C. Sex differences in risk sensitivity under positive and negative budgets and predictors of choice. J. Gen. Psychol. 2007, 134:435-452.
11. Ermer E., Cosmides L., Tooby J. Relative status regulates risky decision making about resources in men: evidence for the co-evolution of motivation and cognition. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2008, 29:106-118.
12. Houston A.I., McNamara J.M. A sequential approach to risk taking. Anim. Behav. 1982, 30:260-1261.
13. Houston A.I., McNamara J.M. A framework for the functional analysis of behavior. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:117-130.
14. Kacelnik A., Bateson M. Risky theories-the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am. Zool. 1996, 36:402-434.
15. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
16. Krebs J.R., Kacelnik A. Decision-making. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach 1991, 105-136. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.).
17. McDermott R., Fowler J.H., Smirnov O. On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. J. Polit. 2008, 70:335-350.
18. McNamara J.M., Houston A.I. The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am. Nat. 1986, 127:358-378.
19. Mishra S., Lalumiére M.L. You can't always get what you want: the motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision making. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46:605-611.
20. Perez S.M., Waddington K.D. Carpenter bee (Xylocopa micans) risk indifference and a review of nectarivore risk-sensitivity studies. Am. Zool. 1996, 36:435-446.
21. Pietras C.J., Cherek D.R., Lane S.D., Tcheremissine O. Risk reduction and resource pooling on a cooperation task. Psychol. Rec. 2006, 56:387-410.
22. Pietras C.J., Hackenberg T.D. Risk-sensitive choice in humans as a function of an earnings budget. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2001, 76:1-19.
23. Pietras C.J., Locey M.L., Hackenberg T.D. Human risky choice under temporal constraints: tests of an energy-budget model. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2003, 80:59-75.
24. Pietras C.J., Searcy G.S., Huitema B.E., Brandt A.E. Effects of monetary reserves and rate of gain on human risky choice under budget constraints. Behav. Process. 2008, 78:358-373.
25. Real L., Caraco T. Risk and foraging in stochastic environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1986, 17:371-390.
26. Rode C., Cosmides L., Hell W., Tooby J. When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition 1999, 72:269-304.
27. Schneider S.L., Lopes L.L. Reflection in preferences under risk: who and when may suggest why. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 1986, 12:535-548.
28. Shafir S. Risk-sensitive foraging: the effect of relative variability. Oikos 2000, 88:663-669.
29. Shafir S., Wiegmann D.D., Smith B.H., Real L.A. Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behavior of honey bees in response to variability in volume of reward. Anim. Behav. 1999, 57:1055-1061.
30. Stephens D.W. The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim. Behav. 1981, 29:628-629.
31. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R. Foraging theory 1986, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 247 pp.
32. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 221(4481):453-458.
33. Wang X.T. Risk as reproductive variance. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2002, 23:35-57.
34. Weber E.U., Shafir S., Blais A. Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 111:430-445.