Self-adaptive grids for noise mapping refinement

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 72, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 599-610

  Asensio, C ^a   Recuero, M ^a   Ruiz, M ^a   Ausejo, M ^a   Pavon I ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

GIS; Grid refinement; Interpolation; Noise mapping; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; CONTOUR LINE; GIS; GRID REFINEMENT; ITERATIVE PROCEDURES; NOISE LEVELS; NOISE MAP; NOISE MAPPING; NUMBER OF ITERATIONS; SAMPLING GRIDS; SELF-ADAPTIVE; SINGLE LOCATION; SOUND LEVEL; TARGET QUALITY; UNCERTAINTY;

INTERPOLATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MAPPING; NOISE POLLUTION; OPTIMIZATION;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 79954628562     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. de Smith MJ, Goodchild MF, Longley PA, Geospatial analysis. A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. 3rd ed. SPLINT, London; 2009.
2. M. Ausejo, M. Recuero, C. Asensio, I. Pavón, and J.M. López Study of precision, deviations and uncertainty in the design of the strategic noise map of the macrocenter of the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina Environ Model Assess 15 2010 125 135
3. Manvell D, Aflalo E. Uncertainties in environmental noise assessments - ISO 1996, effects of instrument class and residual sound, Forum Acusticum. Budapest, Hungary; 2005.
4. De Muer T, Botteldooren D. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty in noise mapping. In: Symposium: managing uncertainty in noise measurement and prediction. Le Mans, France; 2005.
5. Stapelfeldt H, Manvell D. Optimising uncertainty and calculation time. Forum Acusticum. Budapest Hungary; 2005.
6. Payne R. Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter, NPL. DQL-AC 002; 2004.
7. Alberola Asensio J, Mendoza López J. Bullmore AJ, Flindell IH. Noise mapping: uncertainties. Forum Acusticum, Sevilla Spain; 2002.
8. Shilton SJ, Van Leeuwen JJA, Nota R. Error propagation analysis of XPS 31-133 and CRTN to help develop a noise mapping data standard. Forum Acusticum, Budapest, Hungary; 2005.
9. Shilton SJ, Van Leeuwen JJA, Nota R. Accuracy implications of using the WG-AEN good practice guide toolkits. Forum Acusticum, Budapest, Hungary; 2005.
10. Shilton S, van Leeuwen H. Research Project NANR 93: WG-AEN's good practice guide and the implications for acoustic. Final report: Quantified accuracy of GPG toolkits, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). DGMR V.2004.1300.00.R011.1; 2005.
11. Shilton S, Trow J, Hii V, Archer N. Research Project NANR 208: Noise modelling. Final report - Part 5: quantified accuracy of GPG toolkits - CRN, The Department for Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). DGMR V.2006.1247.00.R4-5; 2007.
12. De Muer T, Botteldooren D. Uncertainty in noise mapping: comparing a probabilistic and a fuzzy set approach, Lecture notes in computer science. In: Proceedings of the 10th international fuzzy systems association world congress conference on Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 2715; 2003. p. 184.
13. Probst W, Huber B. How to evaluate the accuracy of noise mapping calculations - the standardized approach according to DIN 45687, Internoise. Istanbul, Turkey; 2007.
14. Stapelfeldt H, van Vanda EH, Manvell D. Quality assurance for the calculation of large noise maps. Forum Acusticum, Sevilla Spain; 2002..
15. Hepworth P, Trow J, Hill V. User controlled settings in noise mapping software - The effects on calculation speed and accuracy. Euronoise Tampere, Finland; 2006.
16. van Vanda EH, Stapelfeldt H. Implementing prediction standards in calculation software - the various sources of uncertainty. Forum Acusticum. Budapest, Hungary; 2005.
17. Li J, Heap AD. A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists, Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23 ed., 1st, Canberra, Australia; 2008.
18. ESRI Inc., Arcgis 9.2 Desktop Help, 2009; 2007.
19. European Commission Working Group - assessment of exposure to noise, Good practice guide for strategic noise mapping and the production of associated data on noise exposure. Version 2, WG-AEN 004.2007; 2007.
20. Boeker ER, Dinges E, He B, Felming G, Roof CJ, Gerbi PJ, et al. Integrated noise model (INM) version 7.0 technical manual, FAA-AEE-08-01; 2008.
21. Lewis D, Catlett J. Heterogeneous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. In: Machine learning: proceedings of the eleventh international conference; 1994. p. 148-56.
22. D. Cohn, L. Atlas, and R. Ladner Improving generalization with active learning Mach Learn 15 1994 201 221
23. International organization for standardization. Working group 1 of the joint committee for guides in metrology, Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, ISO. Geneva, Switzerland; 2008.
24. Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) NA 001 BR-02 SO Comittee, DIN 45687. Acoustics - software products for the calculation of the sound propagation outdoors - quality requirements and test conditions; 2006.
25. Asensio C, Ruiz M, Pavón I, Ausejo M, Recuero M. Uncertainty in noise maps isolines: the effect of the sampling grid. Acta Acustica United with Acustica; Accepted for Publication.
26. Paviotti M. Necessary quality of the input data in the noise mapping methods as a function of expected output results. Noise mapping according to the 2002/49/EC. Target quality and input requirements. Ispra, Italy; 2009.
27. Stapelfeldt Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH, Lima 5.2 technical manual; 2008.