Uncertainty in noise maps isolines: The effect of the sampling grid

Acta Acustica united with Acustica

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 237-242

  Asensio, C ^a   Ruiz, M ^a   Pavon I ^a   Ausejo, M ^a   Recuero, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION METHODS; CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; CONTINUOUS VARIABLES; CONTOUR GRAPH; CONTOUR LINE; DISCRETE POINTS; HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND; INTERPOLATION ALGORITHMS; INTERPOLATION PROCESS; INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES; ITS EVALUATION; NOISE MAP; NOISE MODELS; SAMPLING GRIDS; SOUND LEVEL; SPATIAL INTERPOLATION; SPATIAL LOCATION; SPATIAL SAMPLING;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERPOLATION; NOISE POLLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 79952155642     PISSN: 16101928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3813/AAA.918403     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Ausejo, M. Recuero, C. Asensio, I. Pavón, J. M. López: Study of precision, deviations and uncertainty in the design of the strategic noise map of the macrocenter of the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2009.
2. ISO 1996: Uncertainties in environmental noise assessments. Effects of instrument class and residual sound. Forum Acusticum, 2005.
3. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty in noise mapping. Managing uncertainty in noise measurement and prediction. 2005.
4. Optimising uncertainty and calculation time. Forum Acusticum, 2005.
5. R. Payne: Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter. DQL-AC 002, 2004.
6. Noise mapping: Uncertainties. Forum Acusticum, 2002.
7. Error propagation analysis of XPS 31-133 and CRTN to help develop a noise mapping data standard. Forum Acusticum, 2005.
8. Accuracy implications of using the WG-AEN good practice guide toolkits. Forum Acusticum, 2005.
9. S. Shilton, H. van Leeuwen: Research project NANR 93: WG-AEN's good practice guide and the implications for acoustic. Final Report: Quantified Accuracy of GPG Toolkits, 2005. DGMR V.2004.1300.00.R011.1.
10. S. Shilton, J. Trow, V. Hii, N. Archer: Research project NANR 208: Noise modelling. Final report. Part 5: Quantified accuracy of GPG toolkits - crn. DGMR V.2006.1247. 00.R4-5, 2007.
11. T. De Muer, D. Botteldooren: Uncertainty in noise mapping: Comparing a probabilistic and a fuzzy set approach. Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Proceedings of the 10th international fuzzy systems association World Congress conference on Fuzzy sets and systems, 2003, 2715:184.
12. How to evaluate the accuracy of noise mapping calculations - the standardized approach according to DIN 45687. Internoise 2007 Proceedings, 2007.
13. Quality assurance for the calculation of large noise maps. Proceedings Forum Acusticum, 2002.
14. User controlled settings in noise mapping software. The effects on calculation speed and accuracy. Proceedings Euronoise 2006, 2006.
15. Implementig prediction standards in calculation software - the various sources of uncertainty. Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, 2005.
16. ESRI Inc.: Arcgis 9.2 desktop help. Available at: http://webhelp.esri. com/arcgisdesktop/9.2, 2007.
17. European Comission Working Group: Assessment of exposure to noise. Good practice guide for strategic noise mapping and the production of associated data on noise exposure. Version 2. WG-AEN 004.2007, 2007.
18. Self-adaptive grids for noise mapping. ISMA 201 Proceedings, in press.
19. Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology: Evaluation of measurement data. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. 2008.
20. NA 001 BR-02 SO Comittee: DIN 45687. Acoustics. Software products for the calculation of the sound propagation outdoors. Quality requirements and test conditions. 2006.
21. R. Wehrens, H. Putter, L. M. C. Buydens: The bootstrap: A tutorial. Chemometrics Intellig. Lab. Syst. 54 (2000) 35-52.
22. F. A. Farrelly, G. Brambilla: Determination of uncertainty in environmental noise measurements by bootstrap method. J. Sound Vib. 268 (2003) 167-175.