Correlation functions for inhomogeneous magnetic field in random media with application to a dense random pack of spheres

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 154-159

  Audoly, B ^a,b   Sen, P N ^a   Ryu, S ^a   Song, Y Q ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER DOLL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Correlation function; Internal magnetic field; NMR; Structure factor

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

FLUID TRANSPORT;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

MICROSPHERE;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POROSITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MAGNETICS; MICROSPHERES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; POROSITY; STATISTICS;

EID: 0042969361     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-7807(03)00179-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Song Y.-Q., Ryu S., Sen P.N. Determining multiple length scales in rocks. Nature (London). 406:2000;178.
2. Brown R.J.S. Distribution of fields from randomly placed dipoles: free-precession signal decay as a result of magnetic grains. Phys. Rev. 121:1961;1379.
3. Drain L.E. The broadening of magnetic resonance lines due to field inhomogeneity in powdered samples. Phys. Soc. Proc. 80:1962;1380.
4. Sen P.N., Axelrod S. Inhomogeneity in local magnetic field due to susceptibility contrast. J. Appl. Phys. 86:1999;4548.
5. 2 versus τ for Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill NMR with diffusion and susceptibility differences in porous media and tissues Phys. Rev. B. 47:1993;14823.
6. Weisskoff R.M., Zuo C.S., Boxerman J.L., Rosen B.R. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn. Reson. Med. 31:1994;601.
7. Borgia G.C., Brown R.J.S., Fantazzini P. Scaling of spin-echo amplitudes with frequency, diffusion coefficient, pore size, and susceptibility difference for the NMR of fluids in porous media and biological tissues. Phys. Rev. E. 51:1995;2104.
8. Hürlimann M.D. Effective gradients in porous media due to susceptibility differences. J. Magn. Reson. 131:1998;232.
9. Ornstein I., Zernike F. Proc. Acad. Sci. (Amsterdam). 17:1914;793.
10. Berryman J.G., Blair S.C. Use of digital image analysis to estimate fluid permeability of porous materials: application of two-point correlation functions. J. Appl. Phys. 60:1986;1930.
11. Debye P., Anderson H.R., Brumberger H. Scattering by an inhomogenous solid. II. The correlation function and its application. J. Appl. Phys. 28:1957;679.
12. Sen P.N., Hürlimann M.D. Analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance spin echoes using simple structure factors. J. Chem. Phsys. 101:1994;5423.
13. Johnson D.L., Koplik J., Schwartz L.M. New pore-size parameter characterizing transport in porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57:1986;2564.
14. Banavar J.R., Johnson D.L. Characteristic pore sizes and transport in porous media. Phys. Rev. B. 35:1987;7283.
15. Martys N., Garboczi E.J. Length scales relating the fluid permeability and electrical conductivity in random two-dimensional model porous media. Phys. Rev. B. 46:1992;6080.
16. J.L. Finney, Random packing and the structure of the liquid state, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1964.
17. Cargill G.S. Radial distribution functions and microgeometry of dense random packings of hard spheres. Johnson D.L., Sen P.N. Physics and Chemistry of Porous Media. 1984;American Institute of Physics, New York.
18. Jackson J.D. Classical Electrodynamics. second ed. 1962;Wiley, New York.
19. P.N. Sen, B. Audoly, S. Axelrod, Inhomogeneity in Local Magnetic Field due to Susceptibility Contrast, presented at Experimental NMR Conference, 1999.