The value of view through the eyes of real estate experts: A Fuzzy Delphi Approach

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 171-178

  Damigos, Dimitris ^a   Anyfantis, Fotis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Economic valuation; Fuzzy delphi method; Property prices; View

Indexed keywords

GREEN MANUFACTURING;

ECONOMIC VALUATION; EXPERT JUDGMENT TECHNIQUE; FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS; PROPERTY PRICES; VIEW;

COSTS;

FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GREENSPACE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARKET SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRICE DYNAMICS; PROPERTY MARKET; SURVEY; VALUATION;

ATHENS [ATTICA]; ATTICA; GREECE;

EID: 79954600408     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Appleton J. The Experience of Place 1975, John Wiley, New York.
2. Benson E.D., Hansen J.L., Schwartz A.L., Smersh G.T. Pricing residential amenities: the value of a view. J. Real Estate Finan. 1998, 16:55-73.
3. Beron K., Murdoch J., Thayer M. The benefits of visibility improvement: new evidence from the Los Angeles metropolitan area. J. Real Estate Finan. 2001, 22:319-337.
4. Bishop I.D., Lange E., Mahbubul A.M. Estimation of the influence of view components on high-rise apartment pricing using a public survey and GIS modelling. Environ. Plann. B 2004, 31:439-452.
5. Bojadziev G., Bojadziev M. Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance and Management 1997, Word Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
6. Bourassa S.C., Hoesli M., Peng V.S. Do housing submarkets really matter?. J. Hous. Econ. 2003, 12:12-28.
7. Bourassa S.C., Hoesli M., Sun J. What's in a view?. Environ. Plann. A 2004, 36:1427-1450.
8. Butler R.V. The specification of housing indexes for urban housing. Land Econ. 1982, 58:96-108.
9. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., Mitchell R.C. Theory and Measurement of Passive-Use Value. Valuing the Environment Preferences 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I. Bateman, K. Willis (Eds.).
10. Chang I.S., Tsujimura Y., Gen M., Tozawa T. An efficient approach for large scale project planning based on Fuzzy Delphi method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1995, 76:277-288.
11. Constantino N., d'Amato M., Pellegrino R. A real options and Fuzzy Delphi-based approach for appraising the effect of an urban infrastructure on surrounding lands. Fuzzy Econ. Rev. 2009, 14:3-16.
12. Dalkey N. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion 1969, RM-5888-PR, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
13. Dalkey N., Helmer O. An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts 1962, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
14. Damigos D., Kaliampakos D. Environmental economics and the mining industry: monetary benefits of an abandoned quarry rehabilitation in Greece. Environ. Geol. 2003, 44:356-362.
15. Des Rosiers F., Lagana A., Thierault M., Beaudoin M. Shopping centres and house values: an empirical investigation. J. Prop. Valuat. Invest. 1996, 14:411-462.
16. Diamond P., Hausman J., Leonard G., Denning M. Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment 1993, 41-90. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. J. Hausman (Ed.).
17. Doss C.R., Taff S.J. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 1996, 21:120-129.
18. Dransfeld H., Pemberton J., Jacobs G. Quantifying weighted expert opinion: the future of interactive television and retailing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2000, 63:81-90.
19. Gallego M.D., Luna P., Bueno S. Designing a forecasting analysis to understand the diffusion of open source software in the year 2010. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2008, 75:672-686.
20. Glumac B., Han Q., Smeets J.J.A.M., Schaefer W.F. Rethinking Brownfield redevelopment features: applying Fuzzy Delphi. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual European Real Estate Society Conference (ERES Conference 2010) 2010, 1-11.
21. Graves P., Murdoch J.C., Thayer M.A., Waldman D. The robustness of hedonic price estimation: urban air quality. Land Econ. 1988, 64:220-233.
22. Gupta U.G., Clarke R.E. Theory and applications Delphi technique: a bibliography (1975-1994). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1996, 53:185-211.
23. Ho Y.-F., Wang H.-L. Applying Fuzzy Delphi method to select the variables of a sustainable urban system dynamics model. Proceedings of the International Conference of the System Dynamics Society 2008, Available at:. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2008/proceed/papers/HO311.pdf.
24. Horowitz J.K., McConnell K.E. A review of WTA/WTP studies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2002, 44:426-447.
25. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape Urban Plan. 2006, 78:422-434.
26. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Value of scenic views: hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009, 91:226-234.
27. Kaplan S. Perception and landscape: conceptions and misconceptions. Environmental Aesthetics 1992, 45-63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.L. Nasar (Ed.).
28. Kaufman A., Gupta M.M. Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Sciences 1988, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
29. Keeney S., Hasson F., McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: 10 lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J. Adv. Nurs. 2006, 53:205-212.
30. Laasko, S. (1997). Urban housing prices and the demand for housing characteristics. A study of housing prices and the willingness to pay for housing characteristics and local public goods in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Dissertation Thesis, University of Helsinki.
31. Lake I.R., Lovett A.A., Bateman I.J., Day B. Using GIS and large-scale digital data to implement hedonic pricing studies. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2000, 14:521-541.
32. Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2006, 73:467-482.
33. Lange E., Hehl-Lange S., Brewer M.J. Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban-rural fringe. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 89:245-256.
34. Lange E., Schaeffer P. A comment on the market value of a room with a view. Landscape Urban Plan. 2001, 55:113-120.
35. Li S.-P., Will B.F. A fuzzy logic system for visual evaluation. Environ. Plann. B 2005, 32:293-304.
36. Luttik J. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan. 2000, 48:161-167.
37. Macmillan D.C., Marshall K. The Delphi process-an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim. Conserv. 2006, 9:11-19.
38. McLeod P.B. The demand for local amenity: an hedonic price analysis. Environ. Plann. A 1984, 16:389-400.
39. O'Neill S.J., Osborn T.J., Hulme M., Lorenzoni I., Watkinson A.R. Using expert knowledge to assess uncertainties in future polar bear populations under climate change. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1649-1659.
40. Palmquist R. Hedonic methods. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality 1991, 77-120. Elsevier, North-Holland. J. Braden, C. Kolstad (Eds.).
41. Parenté R., Hiöb T., Silver R., Jenkins C., Poe M., Mullins R. The Delphi method, impeachment and terrorism: accuracies of short-range forecasts for volatile world events, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2005, 72:401-411.
42. Pivo G. Responsible property investment criteria developed using the Delphi method. Build. Res. Inf. 2008, 36:20-36.
43. Remøy H., Koppels P., van Oel C., de Jonge H. Characteristics of vacant offices: a Delphi-approach. ENHR International Conference 2007, Available at:. http://www.enhr2007rotterdam.nl/documents/W19_paper_Remoy.pdf.
44. Roßmann J., Schluse M., Hoppen M., Waspe R. Integrating semantic world modeling, 3D-simulation, virtual reality and remote sensing techniques for a new class of interactive GIS-based simulation systems. The 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics 2009, doi:10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2009, 5293523.
45. Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int. J. Forecasting 1999, 15:353-375.
46. Rubin S.E., McMahon B.T., Chan F., Kamnetz B. Research directions related to rehabilitation practice: a Delphi study. J. Rehabil. 1998, 64:19-27.
47. Smith B.H. Coastal setback and the impact of water amenities. Geogr. Anal. 1994, 26:364-369.
48. Spash, C.L. (2008). The Contingent Valuation Method: Retrospect and Prospect, Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED), CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Working Paper Series 2008-04.
49. Tyrväinen L. The amenity value of urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape Urban Plan. 1997, 37:211-222.
50. Tyrväinen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2000, 39:205-233.
51. Vatalis K.I., Kaliampakos D.C. An overall index of environmental quality in coal mining areas and energy facilities. Environ. Manag. 2006, 38:1031-1045.
52. Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ. Impact Asses. 2004, 24:89-124.
53. Wang X. Integrating GIS, simulation models, and visualization in traffic impact analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban 2005, 29:471-496.
54. Yin L., Hastings J. Capitalizing on views: assessing visibility by using 3D visualization and GIS technologies for hotel development in the City of Niagara Falls, New York. J. Urban Technol. 2007, 14:59-82.
55. Yu S.-M., Han S.-S., Chai C.-H. Modeling the value of view in high-rise apartments: a 3D GIS approach. Environ. Plann. B 2007, 34:139-153.