What's so special about model organisms?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 313-323

  Ankeny, Rachel A ^a   Leonelli, Sabina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Experimental organism; Genetics; Model organism; Modeling; Philosophy of biology; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954580250     PISSN: 00393681     EISSN: 18792510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.039     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Achinstein P. Concepts of science 1968, The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
2. Ankeny, R. A. (1997). The conqueror worm: An historical and philosophical examination of the use of the nematode C. elegans as a model organism. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
3. Ankeny R.A. Fashioning descriptive models in biology: Of worms and wiring diagrams. Philosophy of Science 2000, 67(Proc.):S260-S272.
4. Ankeny R.A. Model organisms as models: Understanding the " lingua franca" of the Human Genome Project. Philosophy of Science 2001, 68(Suppl.):S251-S261.
5. Ankeny R.A. The natural history of C. elegans research. Nature Reviews Genetics 2001, 2:474-478.
6. Anonymous The sharing principle. Nature 2009, 459:752.
7. Asdal K. Subjected to parliament: The laboratory of experimental medicine and the animal body. Social Studies of Science 2008, 38:899-917.
8. Barr M.M. Super models. Physiological Genomics 2003, 13:15-24.
9. Bevan M., Walsh S. Positioning Arabidopsis in plant biology. A key step toward unification of plant research. Perspectives on Translational Biology 2004, 135:602-606.
10. Blaxter M. Caenorhabditis elegans is a nematode. Science 1998, 282:2041-2046.
11. Bogen J., Woodward J. Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review 1988, 97:303-352.
12. Bolker J.A. Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays 1995, 17:451-455.
13. Bolker J.A. Exemplary and surrogate models: Two modes of representation in biology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2009, 52:485-499.
14. Bonner J.T. The history of the cellular slime moulds as a " model system" for developmental biology. Journal of Biosciences 1999, 1:7-12.
15. Burian R.M. How the choice of experimental organism matters: Epistemological reflections on an aspect of biological practice. Journal of the History of Biology 1993, 26:351-367.
16. Burian R.M. Exploratory experimentation and the role of histochemical techniques in the work of Jean Brachet, 1938-1952. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 1997, 19:27-45.
17. Bynum W.F. " C'est un malade": Animal models and concepts of human diseases. Journal of the History of Medicine 1990, 45:397-413.
18. Churchill F.B. Life before model systems: General zoology at August Weismann's Institute. American Zoologist 1997, 37:260-268.
19. Clarke A.E. Research materials and reproductive science in the United States, 1910-1940. Physiology in the American context, 1850-1940 1987, 323-350. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD. G.L. Geison (Ed.).
20. Clarke A.E. Embryology and the development of American reproductive science, c. 1900-1940. The American expansion of biology 1991, 180-231. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ. K. Benson, R. Rainger, J. Mainschein (Eds.).
21. The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences 1992, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. A.E. Clarke, J.H. Fujimura (Eds.).
22. Clause B.T. The Wistar rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. Journal of the History of Biology 1993, 26:329-349.
23. Emerging model organisms: A laboratory manual 2009, Vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Cold Spring Harbor Press (Ed.).
24. Emerging model organisms: A laboratory manual 2010, Vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Cold Spring Harbor Press (Ed.).
25. Creager A.N.H. The life of a virus: Tobacco mosaic virus as an experimental model, 1930-1965 2002, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
26. Davies J.A. Developmental biologists' choice of subjects approximates to a power law, with no evidence for the existence of a special group of " model organisms" BMC Developmental Biology 2007, 7:40.
27. Davis R.H. The age of model organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics 2004, 5:69-76.
28. de Chadarevian S. Of worms and programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1998, 29:81-105.
29. Models: The third dimension of science 2004, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. S. de Chadarevian, N. Hopwood (Eds.).
30. Degeling C. Canines, consanguinity, and one-medicine: All the qualities of a dog except loyalty. Health and History 2008, 10:23-47.
31. Dupré, J., & O'Malley, M.A. (2009). Varieties of living things: Life at the intersection of lineage and metabolism. Philosophy and Theory in Biology, 1 Accessed 26.04.10. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.6959004.0001.003.
32. Endersby J. A guinea pig's history of biology 2007, Random House, London.
33. Ernst S.G. A century of sea urchin development. American Zoologist 1997, 37:250-259.
34. Félix M.A. Genomes: A helpful cousin for our favourite worm. Current Biology 2004, 14:R75-R77.
35. Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Models in science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Accessed 26.04.10. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/.
36. Gest H. Arabidopsis to zebrafish: A commentary on " Rosetta stone" model systems in the biological sciences. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1995, 39:77-85.
37. Gilbert S. The adequacy of model systems for evo-devo: Modeling the formation of organisms/modeling the formation of society. Mapping the future of biology 2009, 57-68. Springer, Dordrecht, (pp. 155-169). A. Barberousse, M. Morange, T. Pradeu (Eds.).
38. Glymour B. Data and phenomena: A distinction reconsidered. Erkenntnis 2000, 52:29-37.
39. Griesemer J.R. Material models in biology. PSA 1990 1991, Vol. 2:79-93. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.
40. Grunwald D.J., Eisen J.S. Headwaters of the zebrafish: Emergence of a new model vertebrate. Nature Reviews Genetics 2002, 3:717-723.
41. Guerrini A. Experimenting with humans and animals: From Galen to animal rights 2003, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
42. Hesse M. Models and analogies in science 1966, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
43. Holmes F.L. The old martyr of science: The frog in experimental physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 1993, 26:311-328.
44. Jones A.M., et al. The impact of Arabidopsis research on human health. Cell 2008, 5:939-943.
45. Jørgensen C.B. August Krogh and Claude Bernard on basic principles in experimental physiology. BioScience 2001, 51:59-61.
46. Kandel E.R. In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind 2007, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.
47. Keller E.F. Drosophila embryos as transitional objects: The work of Donald Poulson and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard. History and Sociology of the Physical Sciences 1996, 26:313-346.
48. Keller E.F. Models of and models for: Theory and practice in contemporary biology. Philosophy of Science 2000, 67:S72-S86.
49. Keller E.F. Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors and machines 2002, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Kimmel C.B. Genetics and early development of zebrafish. Trends in Genetics 1989, 5:283-288.
51. Kirk R.G.W. A brave new animal for a brave new world: The British Laboratory Animal Bureau and the constitution of international standards of laboratory animal production and use, c1947-1968. Isis 2010, 101:62-94.
52. Kohler R.E. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
53. Krebs H.A. The August Krogh Principle: 'For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied'. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1975, 194:221-226.
54. Krogh A. The progress of physiology. Science 1929, 70:200-204.
55. Laubichler M.D., Davidson E. Boveri's long experiment: Sea urchin merogones and the establishment of the role of nuclear chromosomes in development. Developmental Biology 2008, 314:1-11.
56. Laubichler M.D., Geison G. The varied lives of organisms: Variation in the historiography of the biological sciences. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2001, 32:1-29.
57. Ledford H. Plant biologists fear for cress project. Nature 2010, 464:154.
58. Leonelli S. What is in a model?. Modeling biology: Structures, behaviours, evolution 2007, 15-36. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Laubichler, G.B. Muller (Eds.).
59. Leonelli S. Growing weed, producing knowledge. An epistemic history of Arabidopsis thaliana. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2007, 29:55-87.
60. Leonelli S. Performing abstraction: Two ways of modeling Arabidopsis thaliana. Biology and Philosophy 2008, 23:509-528.
61. Leonelli, S., & Ankeny, R. A. (submitted for publication). Re-thinking organisms: The impact of databases on model organism biology.
62. Lewens T. Organisms and artifacts: Design in nature and elsewhere 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
63. Logan C.A. '[A]re Norway rats...things?'*: Diversity versus generality in the use of albino rats in experiments on development and sexuality. Journal of the History of Biology 2001, 34:287-314.
64. Logan C.A. Before there were standards: The role of test animals in the production of scientific generality in physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 2002, 35:329-363.
65. Logan C.A. The legacy of Adolf Meyer's comparative approach: Worcester rats and the strange birth of the animal model. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 2005, 40:169-181.
66. Löwy I. From guinea pigs to man: The development of Haffkine's anticholera vaccine. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 1992, 47:270-309.
67. Maher B. Biology's next top model?. Nature 2009, 458:695-698.
68. Maienschein J. Transforming traditions in American biology, 1880-1915 1991, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
69. Marshall E. Bermuda rules: Community spirit, with teeth. Science 2001, 291:1192.
70. Massimi M. Saving unobservable phenomena. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2007, 58:235-262.
71. McAllister J. Phenomena and patterns in data sets. Erkenntnis 1997, 47:217-228.
72. Mitman G., Fausto-Sterling A. Whatever happened to Planaria? C.M. Child and the physiology of inheritance. The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences 1992, 172-197. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. A.E. Clarke, J.H. Fujimura (Eds.).
73. Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.S. Morgan, M. Morrison (Eds.).
74. Morgan M.S. Experiments without material intervention: Model experiments, virtual experiments and virtually experiments. The philosophy of scientific experimentation 2003, 216-235. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA. H. Radder (Ed.).
75. Morgan M.S. Experiments versus models: New phenomena, inference and surprise. Journal of Economic Methodology 2005, 12:317-329.
76. Morrison M., Morgan M.S. Models as mediating instruments. Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science 1999, 10-37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.S. Morgan, M. Morrison (Eds.).
77. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). (n.d.). Model organisms guide Accessed 26.04.10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/model/mammal.html.
78. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (1999). Non-mammalian models workshop Accessed 15.08.10. http://www.nih.gov/science/models/nmm/.
79. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (n.d.). Model organisms for biomedical research Accessed 26.04.10. http://www.nih.gov/science/models/.
80. O'Malley M.A. Exploratory experimentation and scientific practice: Metagenomics and the proteorhodopsin case. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2008, 29:335-358.
81. Pickstone J.V. Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology and medicine 2001, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
82. Rader K.A. The " mouse people": Murine genetics work at the Bussey Institution, 1909-1936. Journal of the History of Biology 1998, 31:327-354.
83. Rader K.A. Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900-1955 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
84. Rhee S.Y. Carpe diem: Retooling the " publish or perish" model into the " share and survive" model. Plant Physiology 2004, 134:543-547.
85. Rheinberger H.-J. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube 1997, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
86. Rheinberger, H.-J., & Müller-Wille, S. (2010). Gene. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Accessed 28.05.10. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/gene/.
87. Rosenthal N., Ashburner M. Taking stock of our models: The function and future of stock centres. Nature Reviews Genetics 2002, 3:711-717.
88. Rubin G.M. Drosophila melanogaster as an experimental organism. Science 1988, 240:1453-1459.
89. Schilling T.F., Webb J. Considering the zebrafish in a comparative context. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2007, 308:515-522.
90. Sedivy J.M. How to learn new and interesting things from model systems based on " exotic" biological species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:19207-19208.
91. Slack J.M.W. Emerging market organisms (review of Emerging Model Organisms: A Laboratory Manual). Science 2009, 323:1674-1675.
92. Sommer R.J. The future of evo-devo: Model systems and evolutionary theory. Nature 2009, 10:416-422.
93. Sommerville C., Koornneef M. A fortunate choice: The history of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Nature Reviews Genetics 2002, 3:883-889.
94. Spradling A., et al. New roles for model genetic organisms in understanding and treating human disease: Report from the 2006 Genetics Society of America Meeting. Genetics 2006, 172:2025-2032.
95. Sterrett S.G. Models of machines and models of phenomena. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2006, 20:69-80.
96. Sulston, J. E. (2002). C. elegans: The cell lineage and beyond. Nobel lecture: Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology, 8 December 2002 Accessed 26.04.10. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2002/sulston-lecture.html.
97. Sulston J., Ferry G. The common thread: A story of science, politics, ethics and the human genome 2002, Joseph Henry Press, London.
98. Sunderland, M. E. (2008). Studying development: The value of diversity, theory, and synthesis. Ph.D. Dissertation. Arizona State University.
99. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. (1998). Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: A platform for investigating biology. Science, 282, 2012-2018.
100. Todes D.P. Pavlov's physiology factory: Experiment, interpretation, laboratory enterprise 2001, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
101. Weber M. Redesigning the fruit fly: The molecularization of Drosophila. Science without laws: Model systems, cases, exemplary narratives 2007, 23-45. Duke University Press, Durham. A.N.H. Creager, E. Lunbeck, M.N. Wise (Eds.).
102. Weisberg M. Who is a modeler?. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2005, 58:207-233.
103. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans 1988, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. W.B. Wood, The Community of C. elegans researchers (Eds.).
104. Zallen D.T. The " light" organism for the job: Green algae and photosynthesis research. Journal of the History of Biology 1993, 26:269-279.