Sensitivity to initial values in full non-parametric maximum-likelihood estimation of the two-parameter logistic model

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 320-336

  Nader, Ingo W ^a   Tran, Ulrich S ^a   Formann, Anton K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; APTITUDE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79954577813     PISSN: 00071102     EISSN: 20448317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000711010X531957     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, F. B. (1987). Methodology review: Item parameter estimation under the one-, two-, and three-parameter logistic models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 111-141. doi.
2. Baker, F. B. (1988). The item log-likelihood surface for two- and three-parameter item characteristic curve models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 387-395. doi.
3. Bartholomew, D. J. (1988). The sensitivity of latent trait analysis to choice of prior distribution. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 101-107.
4. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395-479). Reading, MA Addison-Wesley.
5. Bock, R. D. (1991, April). Item parameter estimation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
6. Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459. doi.
7. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39, 1-38.
8. Drasgow, F. (1989). An evaluation of marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the two-parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 77-90. doi.
9. Du Toit, M. (2003). IRT from SSI. Lincolnwood, IL Scientific Software International.
10. Formann, A. K., & Kohlmann, T. (1998). Structural latent class models. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 530-565. doi.
11. Harwell, M., Stone, C. A., Hsu, T. C., & Kirisci, L. (1996). Monte Carlo studies in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 101-125. doi.
12. Heywood, H. B. (1931). On finite sequences of real numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 134, 486-501. doi.
13. Hulin, C. L., Lissak, R. I., & Drasgow, F. (1982). Recovery of two- and three-parameter logistic item characteristic curves: A Monte Carlo study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 249-260. doi.
14. Karlis, D., & Xekalaki, E. (2003). Choosing initial values for the EM algorithm for finite mixtures. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41, 577-590. doi.
15. Kaskowitz, G. S., & De Ayala, R. J. (2001). The effect of error in item parameter estimates on the test response function method of linking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 39-52. doi.
16. Kim, S. (2006). A comparative study of IRT fixed parameter calibration methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 355-381. doi.
17. Knott, M., & Tzamourani, P. (2007). Bootstrapping the estimated latent distribution of the two-parameter latent trait model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60, 175-191. doi.
18. Lord, F. M. (1968). An analysis of the verbal scholastic aptitude test using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 989-1020. doi.
19. Maitra, R. (2009). Initializing partition-optimization algorithms. IEEE-ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 6, 144-157. doi.
20. Matsumoto, M., & Nishimura, T. (1998). Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 8, 3-30. doi.
21. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166. doi.
22. Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Bayes modal estimation in item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 177-195. doi.
23. Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1990). BILOG 3 (2nd ed.). Mooresville, IN Scientific Software.
24. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1-32. doi.
25. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York McGraw-Hill.
26. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing
27. Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1-25. Retrieved from
28. Stone, C. A. (1992). Recovery of marginal maximum likelihood estimates in the two-parameter logistic response model: An evaluation of MULTILOG. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 1-16. doi.
29. Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2000). Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: Application to cognitive assessment measures. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1651-1683. doi.
30. Thissen, D. (1986). MULTILOG. Mooresville, IN Scientific Software.
31. Tzamourani, P. (1999). Robustness, semiparametric estimation and goodness-of-fit of latent trait models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics
32. Tzamourani, P., & Knott, M. (2002). Fully semiparametric estimation of the two-parameter latent trait model for binary data. In G. A. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
33. Woods, C. M., & Lin, N. (2009). Item response theory with estimation of the latent density using Davidian curves. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 102-117. doi.
34. Woods, C. M., & Thissen, D. (2006). Item response theory with estimation of the latent population distribution using spline-based densities. Psychometrika, 71, 281-301. doi.