Optimised meta-analysis should be based on standardised methods

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 765-766

  Stark, M ^a  

^a New European Surgical Academy   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; HUMAN; LETTER; PERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; STUDY DESIGN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE ADHESION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 79954557859     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02938.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Shi Z, Ma L, Yang Y, Wang H, Schreiber A, Li X, et al., Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BJOG 2011; 118: 410-22.
2. Fatusić Z, Hudić I,. Incidence of post-operative adhesions following Misgav Ladach caesarean section-a comparative study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22: 157-60.
3. Nabhan AF,. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 100: 69-75. (Pubitemid 350216892)
4. Stark M, Gerli S, Di Renzo GC,. The importance of analyzing and standardizing surgical methods. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 122-5.
5. Stark M,. Technique of cesarean section: Misgav Ladach method. In:, Popkin DR, Peddle LJ, editors. Women's Health Today. Perspectives on Current Research and Clinical Practice. Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Montreal. New York: Parthenon Publishing group, 1994, 81-5.